The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Luopan destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como On premise.
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Luopan valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing between Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. While Luopan offers core PMS functionalities, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a user-friendly interface. Are you prioritizing a mature, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, or a flexible, unified system tailored for multi-property growth?
Luopan Arcas PMS, developed by Luopan in Beijing, aims to centralize hotel operations with a comprehensive property management approach. Its core features include reservations, front desk, night audit, and guest profiles, bundled into a single platform designed for medium to large hotels and hotel groups. Conversely, Mews PMS, headquartered in Amsterdam, boasts a broad, cloud-native ecosystem with over 335 verified integrations, serving hotel segments from boutique to large chains globally.
Where Luopan has a limited review presence, with no recent reviews or ratings, Mews benefits from over 759 reviews, with the latest in the past six months, indicating active user engagement. Mews’s recent reviews highlight a 4.62/5 overall rating, with ease of use and support receiving consistently high marks. The core distinction is that Mews has a proven track record of supporting scalability through automation, third-party integrations, and a modern interface, while Luopan’s user feedback remains unavailable or outdated. Would you prefer a platform with a substantial, recent user base or one still establishing its reputation?
If your hotel needs a centralized, multi-property management system with core PMS features and a focus on traditional workflows, Luopan could be suitable—though it lacks recent user reviews or ratings to validate performance. For hotels seeking a scalable, highly-integrated system that supports automation, guest engagement, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive third-party integrations and positive recent reviews make it more adaptable for modern hospitality demands.
For boutique hotels or properties prioritizing ease and innovation, Mews’s user interface and support network are highly valued, especially with a 4.27/5 customer support rating. Conversely, if you’re a larger hotel group looking for a consolidated, yet less tested platform with core PMS functionalities, Luopan might appeal—though the absence of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and evolution.
Mews excels here, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, supported by recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users frequently mention how fast their teams learn the system, with many noting that Mews is built for simplicity and efficiency. Luopan, on the other hand, offers no recent ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability or onboarding experience.
Based on available data, Mews’s onboarding scores of 4.39/5 and detailed user praise place it ahead for staff adoption and daily operation. Edge: Mews.
Mews outshines with 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, digital registration, online check-in/out, task management, and mobile apps. These features are designed to support a fully digital, guest-centric experience and operational automation. Luopan offers core PMS functionalities but lacks the extensive feature set and open API capabilities seen in Mews.
Furthermore, Mews’s features cater to modern hospitality needs, including contactless check-in, guest messaging, integrated POS, and sophisticated reporting—details that are absent or unlisted for Luopan. The clear edge: Mews.
Mews’s support reputation is strong, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating and many recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and ongoing use. Users mention that support is prompt, with some noting quick bug resolution and proactive communication. Luopan, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on support quality, leaving its support level uncertain.
Given Mews’s active support team and recent positive feedback, the edge goes to Mews.
Mews boasts 335 verified integrations, including over 1,000 in its Marketplace, linking to revenue management, POS, channel managers, ID scanners, marketing, and more. It supports seamless connectivity with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, enabling flexible customization. Luopan, by contrast, has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or unverified integration network.
The extensive integrations and API openness give Mews a significant advantage for hotels seeking a versatile, connected tech environment. Edge: Mews.
While Luopan has no recent reviews or ratings, Mews’s latest data shows a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 759 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its ease of use and support. Mews’s favorable reviews span boutique, independent, and branded properties, often highlighting its simplicity and automation benefits.
Without recent Luopan user data, the explicit rating advantage is clear—Mews’s active user base and high ratings tilt the balance firmly in its favor. Edge: Mews.
Luopan does not publicly list its pricing or offer trial information, which complicates direct comparison. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, but exact pricing can vary based on hotel size and needs.
In general, Mews’s transparent pricing model allows for clearer budgeting, while Luopan’s lack of published prices suggests a potential for custom quotes, often typical in enterprise solutions. Budget considerations favor Mews, given its straightforward model.
Luopan offers a traditional, core PMS experience with basic functionalities suited to established hotel management but lacks recent validation or broad integrations. Mews provides a modern, cloud-based ecosystem with extensive features, integrations, and a strong recent user review base, emphasizing automation and scalability.
Opt for Luopan if your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized PMS in a large property or group setting and you prefer a system with a long-standing reputation, even if unverified by recent user feedback. Its core functionalities may suffice for operations focused on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.
Choose Mews if your hotel seeks a flexible, automation-driven platform capable of supporting growth across multiple locations. Its high user ratings, extensive integrations, and modern features make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations.
Mews is the stronger platform, given its active, recent reviews, high overall ratings, and broad feature set. The platform's focus on automation, integrations, and user experience positions it as the better choice for most hotels looking to modernize and scale.
If your hotel values proven engagement and a widely adopted system, Mews is the clear leader. For those needing a simpler, traditional PMS with a focus on core functionalities, Luopan may suffice—though the lack of recent validation suggests caution. Overall, Mews’s proven track record and active user base make it the recommended choice for today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Estas son las funcionalidades que cada proveedor ha configurado, organizadas por grupo de funcionalidades — los mismos datos que se muestran en el panel del proveedor. Expande un grupo para comparar las funcionalidades en paralelo.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Cuentas y finanzas
|
|
|
| Facturación directa | ||
| Informes RevPaR y ADR | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Auditoría nocturna automatizada | ||
|
▾
Marketing y comercio electrónico
|
|
|
| Comunicación con invitados (mensajería SMS) | ||
| Marketing por correo electrónico nativo | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| CRM invitado | ||
| Vales de regalo | ||
| Gerente de Canal | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administración y configuración
|
|
|
| Gestión centralizada de usuarios y roles | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Basado en la nube | ||
| En la premisa | ||
|
▾
Gestión de clientes
|
|
|
| Comunicación con invitados (mensajería SMS) | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Oficina frontal
|
|
|
| Notas y tareas del dispositivo móvil (voz a texto) | ||
| Aplicación movil | ||
| Auditoría nocturna automatizada | ||
| Vista de calendario | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Gestión de grupos
|
|
|
| Funcionalidad de grupo | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Experiencia del huésped
|
|
|
| Escáner de pasaporte e identificación integrado | ||
| Registro digital | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Limpieza interna
|
|
|
| Módulo de limpieza | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Pagos
|
|
|
| Terminal de pago y lector de tarjetas integrados | ||
| Facturación directa | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Gestión de Reservas
|
|
|
| Informes RevPaR y ADR | ||
| Vales de regalo | ||
| Gerente de Canal | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
La gestión de ingresos
|
|
|
| Informes RevPaR y ADR | ||
| Tarifas personalizadas | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Impuestos y Cumplimiento
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Soporte y Capacitación
|
|
|
| Soporte en línea 24 horas al día, 7 días a la semana | ||
|
▾
Bebida alimenticia
|
|
|
| Epopeya | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Módulo de Spa y Bienestar |
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Luopan Arcas PMS y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Luopan Arcas PMS ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Luopan Arcas PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Luopan tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Recomendaciones personalizadas adaptadas a su propiedad.