Luopan Arcas PMS vs. Mews PMS: ¿Cuál es el adecuado para ti?

Actualizado July 12, 2026  ·  887 reseñas verificadas analizadas

Resumen

Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:

Luopan destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como On premise.

Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.

Ver el análisis completo a continuación ↓

¿Cómo se compara Luopan Arcas PMS con Mews PMS?

Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.

HTScore
0
100
Probabilidad de recomendar
0%
93%
Facilidad de uso
0.0/5
4.7/5
Soporte al cliente
0.0/5
4.3/5
Relación calidad-precio
0.0/5
4.4/5
Precio inicial Contact sales From $900/mo
Reseñas verificadas 0 887

¿Cuáles son los pros y contras de Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS?

Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Luopan valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.

Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Pros
+ Ease of Use
+ Automation and Integrations
+ Customizability and Flexibility
+ Incorporación y soporte
Contras
Billing and Invoicing
Informes y análisis
Multi-Property Management

Luopan vs Mews: Rankings por segmento hotelero

Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.

Por tamaño de hotel

Segmento Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) #3 329 reseñas
Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) #1 397 reseñas
Grande (75-199 habitaciones) #3 45 reseñas
Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) #3 49 reseñas

Por tipo de propiedad

Segmento Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Boutique #1 483 reseñas
Lujo #5 220 reseñas
Cadena / Marca #2 170 reseñas
Estancia prolongada #1 130 reseñas

Por región

Segmento Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Norteamérica #8 106 reseñas
Europa #1 660 reseñas
Asia Pacífico #10 17 reseñas
Medio Oriente #28 8 reseñas

The Decision

Choosing between Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. While Luopan offers core PMS functionalities, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a user-friendly interface. Are you prioritizing a mature, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, or a flexible, unified system tailored for multi-property growth?

Is Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS Better for Hotels?

Luopan Arcas PMS, developed by Luopan in Beijing, aims to centralize hotel operations with a comprehensive property management approach. Its core features include reservations, front desk, night audit, and guest profiles, bundled into a single platform designed for medium to large hotels and hotel groups. Conversely, Mews PMS, headquartered in Amsterdam, boasts a broad, cloud-native ecosystem with over 335 verified integrations, serving hotel segments from boutique to large chains globally.

Where Luopan has a limited review presence, with no recent reviews or ratings, Mews benefits from over 759 reviews, with the latest in the past six months, indicating active user engagement. Mews’s recent reviews highlight a 4.62/5 overall rating, with ease of use and support receiving consistently high marks. The core distinction is that Mews has a proven track record of supporting scalability through automation, third-party integrations, and a modern interface, while Luopan’s user feedback remains unavailable or outdated. Would you prefer a platform with a substantial, recent user base or one still establishing its reputation?

Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a centralized, multi-property management system with core PMS features and a focus on traditional workflows, Luopan could be suitable—though it lacks recent user reviews or ratings to validate performance. For hotels seeking a scalable, highly-integrated system that supports automation, guest engagement, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive third-party integrations and positive recent reviews make it more adaptable for modern hospitality demands.

For boutique hotels or properties prioritizing ease and innovation, Mews’s user interface and support network are highly valued, especially with a 4.27/5 customer support rating. Conversely, if you’re a larger hotel group looking for a consolidated, yet less tested platform with core PMS functionalities, Luopan might appeal—though the absence of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and evolution.

Is Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS Easier to Use?

Mews excels here, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, supported by recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users frequently mention how fast their teams learn the system, with many noting that Mews is built for simplicity and efficiency. Luopan, on the other hand, offers no recent ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability or onboarding experience.

Based on available data, Mews’s onboarding scores of 4.39/5 and detailed user praise place it ahead for staff adoption and daily operation. Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Features: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews outshines with 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, digital registration, online check-in/out, task management, and mobile apps. These features are designed to support a fully digital, guest-centric experience and operational automation. Luopan offers core PMS functionalities but lacks the extensive feature set and open API capabilities seen in Mews.

Furthermore, Mews’s features cater to modern hospitality needs, including contactless check-in, guest messaging, integrated POS, and sophisticated reporting—details that are absent or unlisted for Luopan. The clear edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews’s support reputation is strong, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating and many recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and ongoing use. Users mention that support is prompt, with some noting quick bug resolution and proactive communication. Luopan, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on support quality, leaving its support level uncertain.

Given Mews’s active support team and recent positive feedback, the edge goes to Mews.

Which Has More Integrations: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews boasts 335 verified integrations, including over 1,000 in its Marketplace, linking to revenue management, POS, channel managers, ID scanners, marketing, and more. It supports seamless connectivity with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, enabling flexible customization. Luopan, by contrast, has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or unverified integration network.

The extensive integrations and API openness give Mews a significant advantage for hotels seeking a versatile, connected tech environment. Edge: Mews.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

While Luopan has no recent reviews or ratings, Mews’s latest data shows a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 759 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its ease of use and support. Mews’s favorable reviews span boutique, independent, and branded properties, often highlighting its simplicity and automation benefits.

Without recent Luopan user data, the explicit rating advantage is clear—Mews’s active user base and high ratings tilt the balance firmly in its favor. Edge: Mews.

How Much Do Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS Cost?

Luopan does not publicly list its pricing or offer trial information, which complicates direct comparison. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, but exact pricing can vary based on hotel size and needs.

In general, Mews’s transparent pricing model allows for clearer budgeting, while Luopan’s lack of published prices suggests a potential for custom quotes, often typical in enterprise solutions. Budget considerations favor Mews, given its straightforward model.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Luopan Arcas PMS?

  • Hotels that prioritize core property management functionalities and have a preference for established, possibly multi-property management.
  • Hotel groups seeking a centralized system designed for medium to large properties with standardized workflows.
  • Teams that prefer a system with a focus on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.
  • Not ideal if: you're looking for a modern, automation-heavy platform or prioritize quick onboarding and integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews PMS?

  • Boutique, independent, or chain hotels aiming for a modern, flexible, and scalable platform.
  • Properties that value automation, guest engagement tools, and extensive third-party integrations.
  • Teams seeking fast onboarding, ongoing support, and a platform adaptable to evolving hospitality trends.
  • Not ideal if: your hotel prefers a legacy system with limited integrations or is very small with minimal technical needs.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Core Difference in 2 Sentences

Luopan offers a traditional, core PMS experience with basic functionalities suited to established hotel management but lacks recent validation or broad integrations. Mews provides a modern, cloud-based ecosystem with extensive features, integrations, and a strong recent user review base, emphasizing automation and scalability.

When to Choose Luopan

Opt for Luopan if your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized PMS in a large property or group setting and you prefer a system with a long-standing reputation, even if unverified by recent user feedback. Its core functionalities may suffice for operations focused on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.

When to Choose Mews

Choose Mews if your hotel seeks a flexible, automation-driven platform capable of supporting growth across multiple locations. Its high user ratings, extensive integrations, and modern features make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations.

Our Verdict

Mews is the stronger platform, given its active, recent reviews, high overall ratings, and broad feature set. The platform's focus on automation, integrations, and user experience positions it as the better choice for most hotels looking to modernize and scale.

If your hotel values proven engagement and a widely adopted system, Mews is the clear leader. For those needing a simpler, traditional PMS with a focus on core functionalities, Luopan may suffice—though the lack of recent validation suggests caution. Overall, Mews’s proven track record and active user base make it the recommended choice for today’s competitive hospitality landscape.

¿Cuánto cuestan Luopan Arcas PMS y Mews PMS?

Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.

Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Starting Price From $900/mo

Comparación de funcionalidades: Luopan Arcas PMS frente a Mews PMS

Estas son las funcionalidades que cada proveedor ha configurado, organizadas por grupo de funcionalidades — los mismos datos que se muestran en el panel del proveedor. Expande un grupo para comparar las funcionalidades en paralelo.

Funcionalidad Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Cuentas y finanzas
100%
100%
Facturación directa
Informes RevPaR y ADR
Multi moneda
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
Auditoría nocturna automatizada
Marketing y comercio electrónico
100%
100%
Comunicación con invitados (mensajería SMS)
Marketing por correo electrónico nativo
Perfiles de invitados
CRM invitado
Vales de regalo
Gerente de Canal
Motor de reservas
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
Administración y configuración
100%
75%
Gestión centralizada de usuarios y roles
Plurilingüe
Basado en la nube
En la premisa
Gestión de clientes
75%
100%
Comunicación con invitados (mensajería SMS)
Perfiles de invitados
Centralized Messaging
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
Oficina frontal
75%
92%
Notas y tareas del dispositivo móvil (voz a texto)
Aplicación movil
Auditoría nocturna automatizada
Vista de calendario
Plurilingüe
Task Management
Automated reminders
Perfiles de invitados
Tablet/Kiosk Check-in
Payment Requests
Centralized Messaging
Automated Space Optimization
Gestión de grupos
100%
100%
Funcionalidad de grupo
Automated Space Optimization
Experiencia del huésped
56%
100%
Escáner de pasaporte e identificación integrado
Registro digital
Guest App
Online Check-in
Online Checkout
Guest Messaging
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill
Lobby Kiosk
Limpieza interna
88%
100%
Módulo de limpieza
Housekeeping Mobile App
Real-Time Status Updates
Automated Assignments
Real Time Reporting
Shift Planning
Employee Messaging
Online Checkout
Pagos
100%
100%
Terminal de pago y lector de tarjetas integrados
Facturación directa
Multi moneda
Procesando pago
Payment Requests
Gestión de Reservas
100%
100%
Informes RevPaR y ADR
Vales de regalo
Gerente de Canal
CRS integrado
Drag-n-Drop Tapechart
Rate Management
Automated Space Optimization
Rules Based Room Assignments
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
La gestión de ingresos
100%
100%
Informes RevPaR y ADR
Tarifas personalizadas
Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares
Módulo de gestión de ingresos
Base Pricing
Impuestos y Cumplimiento
50%
100%
PCI Compliant
GDPR Compliant
SOC2 Complaint
Tax Configuration
Soporte y Capacitación
0%
100%
Soporte en línea 24 horas al día, 7 días a la semana
Bebida alimenticia
100%
100%
Epopeya
Spa
100%
0%
Módulo de Spa y Bienestar

Resultados reales: Luopan vs Mews por objetivo de negocio

Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.

Aumentar ingresos y reducir costos
Luopan Luopan

Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.

Mews Episode Tbilisi Pequeño
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
Aumentar la eficiencia operativa
Luopan Luopan

Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.

Mews Aplend Apartments Mediano
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
Mejorar la experiencia del huésped
Luopan Luopan

Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.

Mews Leven Manchester Pequeño
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Luopan vs Mews: Conclusión final

Luopan
Luopan
0.0/5 de 0 reseñas

Capacidades únicas

En la premisa Módulo de Spa y Bienestar
0.0/5 facilidad de uso 0.0/5 soporte 0 integraciones
Ver perfil
Mews
Mews
4.7/5 de 887 reseñas

Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros

Ease of Use 89% positivo

Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.

Automation and Integrations 69% positivo

Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.

Customizability and Flexibility 69% positivo

Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.

Donde los hoteleros objetan

Billing and Invoicing 77% negativo

Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.

Informes y análisis 60% negativo

Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.

Capacidades únicas

Plurilingüe Multi moneda CRM invitado Perfiles de invitados Soporte en línea 24 horas al día, 7 días a la semana
4.7/5 facilidad de uso 4.3/5 soporte 335 integraciones
Visitar sitio web

Donde más difieren las calificaciones

Calificación general Mews 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Facilidad de uso Mews 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Soporte al cliente Mews 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
Relación calidad-precio Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
Incorporación Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

Preguntas frecuentes sobre Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS

¿Puede Luopan Arcas PMS reemplazar a Mews PMS?

Depende de tus requerimientos. Luopan Arcas PMS y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Luopan Arcas PMS ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.

¿Cuál es mejor para hoteles pequeños o independientes?

Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.

¿Ofrecen Luopan Arcas PMS o Mews PMS un plan gratuito?

Luopan Arcas PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.

¿Cómo evalúa y clasifica HTR a Luopan Arcas PMS y Mews PMS?

El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Luopan tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.

Grupo de criterios Peso Qué mide
Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes

¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto?

Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito

El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección.

Ecosistema de socios

¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa?

Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones

Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado.

Enfoque en el cliente

¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización?

Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil

Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades.

Alcance, solidez y recursos

¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa?

Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia

Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses.

Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →

Obtén tu informe gratuito de analista de IA.

Recomendaciones personalizadas adaptadas a su propiedad.

Ghostel icon
Con la confianza de
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

Busquemos la información de tu hotel