The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 23 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
PXP destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
roommaster destaca en ease of use and customer support , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Splitting.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 23 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 23 |
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de procesamiento de pagos para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 6 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 7 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | — | #4 1 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | — | #4 0 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 reseñas |
| Lujo | — | #5 0 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca | — | #4 1 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada | — | #4 0 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #4 14 reseñas |
| Europa | — | #5 0 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente | — | #3 0 reseñas |
Both PXP by PXP and roommaster Payments aim to streamline hotel payment processes, but they approach this goal from different angles. PXP offers a comprehensive payment platform with multiple payment options and global reach, while roommaster Payments focuses on deep integration within your existing property management system (PMS) to reduce manual work and improve operational efficiency. How do these differences impact your hotel’s specific needs?
PXP’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating suggest it’s unproven in current hotel environments, whereas roommaster’s more recent feedback and higher customer support scores indicate a more reliable choice. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
While PXP promises a broad set of features and multiple payment options, it lacks recent user feedback and a clear satisfaction record. roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews in the past six months and an NPS score of 8.4/10, demonstrates higher customer satisfaction and ongoing support. Given the importance of reliable support in payments processing, roommaster is the stronger choice at this moment.
In terms of overall ratings and recent review activity, roommaster Payments far exceeds PXP. Its ease of use, customer support, and positive hotel segment ratings make it the more dependable option for your hotel today.
PXP and roommaster Payments both promise to simplify payments, but they serve different hotel profiles. PXP provides a global, multi-channel payment ecosystem with extensive payment method support, ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs multi-currency settlement options like DCC and accepts diverse payment methods including Apple Pay, Paypal, and American Express.
roommaster Payments, on the other hand, is designed for hotels wanting seamless integration within their PMS, with features like deposit handling, pre-authorizations, and dispute resolution built into the system. If your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, automated reconciliation, and reducing manual workload, roommaster is more suitable.
However, PXP’s lack of recent user reviews and an overall 0/5 rating make it difficult to recommend confidently. Do you need a proven, well-supported system, or are you prepared to navigate potential instability with a less-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a proven, support-rich system with a strong hotel user base and recent positive reviews, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 recent reviews in the last six months and an 8.4/10 NPS demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction and reliable support—crucial for payment systems.
If, however, your hotel requires a payment platform with diverse payment options supporting global currencies and multiple processors, PXP might seem appealing. But given the absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, its long-term reliability is questionable. For most hotels, especially those prioritizing stability and support, roommaster Payments is the safer choice.
roommaster Payments scores a high 4.4/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its straightforward integration and intuitive interface. Users highlight that support staff like Aladdein are helpful and resolve issues promptly, reflecting a strong support team.
In contrast, PXP’s interface and usability are unverified, and no recent reviews or ratings are available to confirm its user-friendliness. Given the critical importance of smooth payment workflows, roommaster’s more recent positive feedback makes it the clear winner here.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP offers 13 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, DCC, Google Pay, Apple Pay, Paypal, American Express acceptance, and multiple processor gateways. These features cater well to international hotels or properties needing flexible, multi-channel payment options.
roommaster Payments provides only one exclusive feature—payment splitting—but covers core hotel payment needs effectively, including deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management, with a focus on automation and integration. If you want a broader array of payment methods, PXP has the edge; if operational workflows matter more, roommaster’s features are sufficient.
Edge: PXP
roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating and recent reviews citing helpful, knowledgeable staff willing to resolve issues quickly. Comments like “they answer my calls and help resolve issues in a timely manner” reinforce the perception of reliable support.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for PXP, but its overall lack of feedback and a 0/5 rating cast doubt on its support quality. For critical payment operations, dependable support is essential, making roommaster Payments the superior choice.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified partners, including major property management and hospitality systems like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric, along with shared integrations with Oracle Hospitality and Canary Technologies. This broad ecosystem supports extensive operational connectivity.
PXP has only 7 verified partners, with some notable integrations like Canary Technologies and Profitroom but far fewer overall. For hotels that rely on multiple integrated systems or plan to expand integrations, roommaster’s larger partner network offers more flexibility.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments has a recent, high NPS score of 8.4/10 based on 20 reviews, with hotel segments like resorts and independent hotels giving positive feedback on support and ease of use. Its recent review activity signals current relevance and satisfaction.
PXP, on the other hand, has a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, making it impossible to determine user sentiment. Given the importance of user satisfaction for ongoing support, roommaster’s higher recent ratings hold considerable weight.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP’s pricing is not explicitly listed, but it appears to be a base fee of $100 with no mention of additional charges. roommaster Payments charges a base price of $300, with no mention of implementation fees or monthly per-room charges.
In absence of detailed PXP pricing, roommaster’s transparent flat fee provides clarity. If cost predictability is essential, roommaster’s straightforward pricing model is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a proven, support-driven platform, or if you prefer a system with recent reviews and high user satisfaction.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a broad array of payment methods or operates in multiple countries with complex international requirements.
The core difference lies in support and proven reliability. roommaster Payments is a well-supported, recent, and highly rated solution tailored for operational efficiency, whereas PXP’s limited recent feedback, unverified usability, and fewer integrations suggest it’s a less stable choice.
Choose roommaster Payments if your priority is support, ease of use, and recent positive hotel feedback. Its extensive integrations and proven track record make it a safer, more dependable option for most properties.
Opt for PXP only if your hotel needs its specific features like multi-currency settlements and diverse payment options, and you’re prepared to accept higher risk due to limited recent review data.
In summary, roommaster Payments currently stands out as the more reliable, well-supported payment platform, especially for hotels seeking operational stability and support. PXP may appeal to highly international or technologically advanced properties, but its unproven recent standing makes it a riskier option.
Los precios de Software de procesamiento de pagos rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, PXP y roommaster Payments comparten 12 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acepta Apple Pay | ||
| Acepta Google Pay | ||
| Acepta Paypal | ||
| Conversión dinámica de moneda (DCC) | ||
| División de pagos | ||
| Liquidaciones multidivisa | ||
| Pagos recurrentes |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 2 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Capacidades únicas
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. PXP y roommaster Payments comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Payments Processing Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. PXP ofrece 7 socios de integración verificados, mientras que roommaster Payments ofrece 56. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. roommaster Payments lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
PXP: No. roommaster Payments: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Payments Processing Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. PXP tiene un HT Score de 0 y roommaster tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos