The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,332 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Angelfish se distingue .
SiteMinder se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.3/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,332 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 1,332 |
Apres analyse de 1,332 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Angelfish apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de SiteMinder mettent en avant channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, défis du service client. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Défis du service client
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Défis du service client
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Moteur de réservation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 470 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 527 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 96 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #1 50 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 564 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #1 411 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #1 230 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 174 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #2 157 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 266 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #1 418 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #3 13 avis |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves evaluating not just features but overall performance, support, and suitability for your property's size and market segment. Angelfish Software by Angelfish and SiteMinder Booking Engine are two options that aim to streamline your online reservations, but they differ significantly in maturity, scope, and user feedback.
While Angelfish targets a niche with a strong focus on website analytics and log analysis, SiteMinder offers a broad, well-established distribution and booking platform with extensive integrations and a large global user base. How do these differences influence your decision?
Angelfish Software is primarily known for its log analysis and website analytics, helping you understand your online traffic and user behavior. It does not function as a traditional booking engine but offers insights that can inform your digital marketing and booking strategies.
In contrast, SiteMinder’s booking engine is designed exclusively for online reservations, emphasizing direct bookings, multi-channel distribution, and seamless integration with PMS and other systems. With over 1,200 recent reviews and a high 4.48/5 overall rating, SiteMinder provides a well-rounded, mature solution.
Given the review volume and recent positive feedback, SiteMinder’s platform is clearly more trusted and proven. Are you looking for a robust, scalable booking system or deeper website analytics?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, easy-to-use booking platform with extensive integrations, SiteMinder is the clear choice. Its features support a variety of hotel types—from boutique to large resorts—and its user ratings reflect high satisfaction.
However, if your team’s focus is on understanding website traffic and user behavior to optimize marketing efforts rather than bookings directly, Angelfish’s analytics tools might be more relevant. Yet, with zero reviews and a negligible score, Angelfish cannot match SiteMinder’s credibility. For most hoteliers, SiteMinder offers more immediate value.
SiteMinder’s interface is rated 4.6/5 in ease of use, praised for its intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal learning curve. Its onboarding process in recent reviews has been described as smooth, with many users noting how quickly they adopted the platform.
Angelfish, on the other hand, has a 0/5 usability score and no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess. Based on the feedback, SiteMinder’s user experience is clearly superior, especially for hoteliers seeking a straightforward setup.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder offers 39 features, including room and rate filtering, performance reporting, rate intelligence, multi-currency support, multi-lingual capabilities, and advanced inventory management. Its open API and PMS connectivity enable deep integrations, making it a versatile choice.
Angelfish provides no additional features beyond website log analysis, focusing on data insights rather than booking functionalities. For a hotel looking to optimize direct reservations and manage online distribution, SiteMinder’s feature set is far more comprehensive.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder maintains a 4.43/5 support rating, with many reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpfulness. Property owners frequently mention how support staff assist with technical issues promptly, often citing real examples of quick resolutions.
Angelfish has no recent reviews or ratings related to support, making it impossible to judge. Given SiteMinder’s large user base and consistent feedback on support quality, it clearly leads in this area.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder boasts over 245 verified partners, including major OTAs, PMS systems like Duve, and a host of other distribution tools. Its extensive network simplifies multi-channel management and reduces manual workload.
Angelfish, with just 3 verified partners, offers extremely limited integration options, primarily focused on log data analysis rather than distribution or booking management. For expanding connectivity and automation, SiteMinder is the superior choice.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s recent reviews and high 4.48/5 rating, along with a 9.08/10 NPS score, reflect strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, from boutique properties to resorts, praise its reliability, scalability, and ease of use.
Angelfish, with zero reviews and ratings, cannot be considered a trusted option. For your hotel’s confidence and proven performance, SiteMinder is the clear leader.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Angelfish does not publish pricing or offer a freemium model, making cost assessment difficult. It appears to be a niche product, possibly custom-priced or targeted at specific analytics needs.
SiteMinder’s booking engine starts at $500/month, with no additional implementation fees or per-room charges. Given its extensive features and proven track record, its pricing aligns with its value proposition.
Note: Exact pricing may vary based on the property’s size and needs.
Angelfish’s strength lies in analytics, not in managing reservations or distribution channels.
SiteMinder suits properties aiming to grow their online reservations and streamline operations.
SiteMinder’s booking engine is a mature, feature-rich platform that commands a large, satisfied user base. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and proven support make it the safer and more comprehensive choice for most hotels.
Angelfish offers specialized insights into website analytics but lacks the booking and distribution functionalities that most hoteliers need to drive revenue. Its limited reviews and absence of recent feedback make it a less reliable option.
For hotels prioritizing direct bookings, operational efficiency, and scalable growth, SiteMinder is the recommended solution. If your focus is on digital marketing insights and user behavior, Angelfish could supplement your strategy but not replace a dedicated booking engine.
La tarification des Moteur de réservation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Angelfish Software et SiteMinder Booking Engine partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API ouverte | ||
| Comparaison des tarifs des chambres | ||
| Filtrage par type de chambre et de tarif | ||
| Filtres d'achat de taux rapides | ||
| Rapports sur les performances | ||
| Taux de renseignement |
Affichage des principales differences. 27 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulière... Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulièrement préoccupant aux heures de pointe. Un support plus rapide et plus réactif est donc considéré comme un axe d'amélioration.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulière... Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulièrement préoccupant aux heures de pointe. Un support plus rapide et plus réactif est donc considéré comme un axe d'amélioration.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Angelfish Software et SiteMinder Booking Engine partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Booking Engine de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Angelfish Software propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que SiteMinder Booking Engine en propose 245. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. SiteMinder Booking Engine est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Angelfish Software : Non. SiteMinder Booking Engine : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Booking Engine proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Angelfish a un HT Score de 0 et SiteMinder a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits