The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 19 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HPE/Aruba se distingue .
Sojern se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Notes comparees basees sur 19 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 19 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de messagerie pour invités pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #13 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #20 10 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #19 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #18 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #20 9 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #22 5 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #18 6 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #24 1 avis |
Par region
| Segment | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #12 17 avis |
| Europe | — | #21 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #18 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #10 1 avis |
Choosing between Aruba Central by HPE/Aruba and Sojern AI Smart Concierge for your hotel hinges on your primary needs. Aruba Central is designed to manage and monitor your network, providing centralized control and insights into your wired and wireless infrastructure. Conversely, Sojern AI Smart Concierge focuses on guest communication, reducing staff workload and improving guest satisfaction through AI-driven messaging. Both address communication, but their core functions diverge significantly.
If your hotel prioritizes guest engagement and operational efficiency through automated messaging, Sojern is the clear choice. If your primary concern is network management and infrastructure visibility, Aruba Central is the appropriate tool. But which is ultimately more suited for your property?
Aruba Central aims to simplify network management across large or complex hotel environments, integrating with hardware like switches and access points. However, it appears to lack recent reviews and a high user rating, which raises questions about its current effectiveness or user satisfaction. Sojern, with a stunning 4.75/5 rating based on 17 reviews—most recent within the last six months—offers a well-supported solution, especially appreciated for its ease of use and strong customer support.
While Aruba Central excels at providing real-time analytics and centralized network control, its absence of recent user feedback and support ratings suggests it might not be as responsive or user-friendly today. Sojern’s recent reviews highlight its simplicity, robust features, and high recommendation rate, with a 9.71 NPS score and 96% likelihood to recommend. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Ease of use can make or break software adoption across your team. Aruba Central’s usability score is not provided, and no recent reviews imply limited recent user feedback or ongoing support. Alternatively, Sojern enjoys a 4.59/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its straightforward setup and intuitive interface. Review quotes emphasize how quickly staff can adapt and learn the system, saving time and reducing frustration.
In addition, Sojern’s onboarding process scores highly at 4.81/5, indicating a smooth transition for your team and minimal training time. Given the recent positive feedback on usability and onboarding, edge: Sojern.
Aruba Central’s feature set appears limited or unspecified, focusing mainly on network management and infrastructure control. In contrast, Sojern boasts 18 distinct features, including WhatsApp integration, chatbot booking, guest history, automated replies, live translations, and analytics dashboards—features specifically tailored to guest communication and engagement.
These capabilities enable your hotel to create personalized, automated interactions, reduce response times, and improve overall guest satisfaction. With that, it’s clear that Sojern offers a richer feature set designed explicitly for guest messaging. Edge: Sojern.
Customer support quality is critical for ongoing success. Aruba Central’s support ratings are not available, and no recent reviews provide insight into its support experience. Conversely, Sojern scores a near-perfect 4.88/5 for support, with recent reviews praising prompt, helpful, and attentive assistance.
Guests consistently mention how support staff listens and accommodates requests, which fosters trust and smooths onboarding. Given the high support ratings and recent positive feedback, edge: Sojern.
Integration breadth can significantly impact your hotel’s operational workflows. Aruba Central does not list verified partners, suggesting limited or no integrations. In contrast, Sojern offers 33 verified partners, including major platforms like Profitroom, Mirai, HOTELTIME, and Vertical Booking, along with shared integrations with other industry tools.
This extensive partner network allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with your existing PMS, booking engines, and revenue management tools, streamlining operations. Edge: Sojern.
Recent reviews paint a clear picture: Aruba Central remains unreviewed in recent times, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Sojern’s recent reviews consistently rate it at 4.75/5, with a 96% likelihood of recommendation across diverse property types like boutique hotels, branded hotels, motels, and more.
Hotel segments such as boutique and branded hotels particularly praise Sojern’s ease of use, support, and feature depth. With more recent and positive feedback, edge: Sojern.
Pricing transparency favors Sojern, which charges a straightforward $400 monthly fee without additional implementation or setup costs. Aruba Central’s pricing information is unavailable, and no free tier or trial details are provided, making it harder to assess overall value.
Given Sojern’s clear pricing structure and high value for money based on user reviews, your hotel can confidently plan your budget around it. Edge: Sojern.
Not ideal if your hotel’s core focus is guest communication, or if you lack the technical infrastructure to support advanced network management.
Not ideal if your primary requirement is network infrastructure management or if your hotel’s operations don’t heavily rely on guest messaging.
Aruba Central and Sojern serve vastly different purposes. Aruba Central is a network management system best suited for large hotels with complex infrastructure needs, while Sojern is a guest communication tool designed to streamline interactions and improve guest satisfaction through AI-powered messaging.
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-use guest messaging platform that is backed by recent reviews and high support ratings, Sojern is the clear winner. For properties focused on network infrastructure or security, Aruba Central might still be relevant, but the lack of recent feedback and limited reviews diminish its appeal.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking an effective guest messaging solution, Sojern’s extensive features, positive recent reviews, and high customer support position it as the more trustworthy and valuable choice.
La tarification des Logiciel de messagerie pour invités est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| HPE/Aruba |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Aruba Central et Sojern AI Smart Concierge partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | HPE/Aruba |
|
|---|---|---|
| Adapté aux mobiles | ||
| Application de bureau (non basée sur le Web) | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Intégration Whatsapp | ||
| Partage de photos | ||
| Réponses automatisées |
Affichage des principales differences. 6 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Aruba Central et Sojern AI Smart Concierge partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Guest Messaging Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Aruba Central propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sojern AI Smart Concierge en propose 33. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Sojern AI Smart Concierge est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Aruba Central : Non. Sojern AI Smart Concierge : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Guest Messaging Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HPE/Aruba a un HT Score de 0 et Sojern a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété