The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 15 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Ascent360 se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Event Based Automations and Email Newsletters.
Sojern se distingue en onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews).
Notes comparees basees sur 15 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $700/mo | From $400/mo |
| Avis verifies | 3 | 12 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs CRM hôtelier et marketing par e-mail pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | #25 1 avis | #20 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #21 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #16 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #14 2 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | — | #21 4 avis |
| Luxe | #33 1 avis | #27 1 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #21 4 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #29 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #21 1 avis | #9 9 avis |
| Europe | — | #28 2 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #18 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #15 0 avis |
Choosing between Ascent360 by Ascent360 and Sojern Guest Marketing Suite by Sojern hinges on your hotel’s specific marketing and guest engagement needs. Both aim to improve guest relationships through email and data management but diverge significantly in features, integrations, and user experience. Your decision should reflect whether your priorities lean toward a robust segmentation and automation platform or a more straightforward guest communication tool.
Both products serve the hotel CRM and email marketing space, but Sojern's recent updates and larger review base make it more reliable for recent performance insights. Do you need a comprehensive, data-driven platform, or a simpler tool for ongoing guest communication?
Both platforms address guest engagement, data management, and targeted marketing. Ascent360 offers a unified customer data platform with advanced segmentation and automation features, while Sojern emphasizes easy-to-use email, SMS, and chat engagement with a focus on direct booking growth.
However, Sojern has more recent reviews and a larger review count, giving you more current feedback on its real-world performance. Ascent360’s reviews are sparse, mostly outdated, and lack recent user insights. Given the review quantity and recency, Sojern provides a clearer picture of ongoing support and features. Would you prefer a platform with extensive recent feedback or a specialized, all-in-one data platform?
If your hotel primarily needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement guest communication tool that simplifies email and SMS outreach, Sojern is the better option. It is especially suitable if your focus is on managing reservations, monitoring campaigns, and increasing direct bookings with minimal setup.
On the other hand, if your team requires sophisticated segmentation, automation, and a centralized multi-property solution, Ascent360 is more appropriate. It boasts 11 unique features like event-based automations, loyalty segmentation, and a centralized multi-hotel platform, making it ideal for larger or more data-driven hotels.
In summary, opt for Sojern if simplicity and recent positive reviews matter most. Choose Ascent360 if a comprehensive marketing automation platform is your priority.
Ascent360 scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, reflecting its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and user-friendly features. However, its onboarding rating of 3/5 indicates some room for improvement in initial setup and training, which may pose minor hurdles.
Sojern scores slightly lower at 4.75/5 but boasts an impressive onboarding rating of 4.91/5, highlighting a smooth, quick onboarding process praised by users. Many reviews emphasize how easy it is to monitor reservations and manage campaigns, with comments like "the platform is very easy to reconcile" and "the interface is simple and eye-catching."
Edge: Sojern
Ascent360 offers 11 features unique to its platform, including A/B testing, event-based automations, loyalty segmentation, and a centralized multi-property solution. These are targeted at marketers seeking granular control, automation, and enriched customer insights.
Sojern provides only 2 unique features—transactional templates and a guest feedback module—focused on communication and review collection. While simpler, this limits its scope for automation and segmentation.
With 11 features, Ascent360 clearly leads in capabilities, especially if personalization, automation, and multi-property management are priorities. For feature depth, edge: Ascent360.
Both products enjoy high support ratings, but Ascent360's support score is 5/5, with reviews highlighting satisfaction and ongoing assistance. Users mention enjoying the CRM and segmentation support, though some note onboarding could be improved.
Sojern has a support score of 4.92/5, with many reviews emphasizing the ease of reconciliation and attentive customer service. Testimonials describe the platform as "really simple and eye-catching," and the support team as helpful in improving invoice processes.
Given the slightly higher customer support score and recent positive reviews, edge: Sojern.
Sojern boasts 33 verified integrations, vastly surpassing Ascent360’s 6. Shared integrations include major PMS and booking platforms like WebRezPro, Maestro PMS, and Cloudbeds. Unique integrations such as Profitroom and Mirai further extend its compatibility.
Ascent360 offers 6 verified partners, primarily focused on hotel management systems, with notable integrations like Springer-Miller and Tripleseat but fewer overall connections.
The broader integration network makes Sojern more adaptable for hotels with diverse tech stacks. Edge: Sojern.
Sojern has more recent reviews, with 12 reviews in the last 6 months, compared to Ascent360’s zero. Its overall support and ease of use ratings are marginally higher, with a 4.92/5 support score versus Ascent360’s 5/5 but with some comments about onboarding room for improvement.
User feedback for Sojern emphasizes its simplicity and ongoing support, with a 10/5 NPS score indicating high satisfaction. Ascent360’s review count and recent feedback are minimal, making its ratings less reliable for current performance.
Given the recency and quantity of reviews, edge: Sojern.
Ascent360 charges a base price of $900/month, with no freemium, flat-rate, or per-room fees indicated. Its pricing suggests a premium positioning, possibly reflecting its advanced features.
Sojern’s starting price is $400/month, also without additional fees, making it more affordable for smaller hotels or properties with tighter budgets.
Pricing may influence your choice based on value perception, but Sojern’s lower entry cost combined with recent positive reviews offers a compelling case for cost-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core Difference:
Ascent360 offers a comprehensive marketing automation platform with advanced segmentation and multi-property features. Sojern provides a streamlined guest communication suite focused on reservation management, email, and SMS engagement.
When to Choose Ascent360:
If your hotel requires in-depth segmentation, automation, and centralized management across multiple properties, Ascent360’s 11 features and integrations make it the right fit. Its platform suits larger hotels or brands that want to leverage detailed customer data for personalized marketing campaigns.
When to Choose Sojern:
If your goal is simple, efficient guest communication with quick reconciliation and a focus on direct booking growth, Sojern’s ease of use and lower price point are appealing. Its support and recent reviews indicate a reliable, user-friendly experience for properties seeking straightforward engagement tools.
Final Verdict:
Given the higher review count, recent positive feedback, and broader integrations, Sojern is the stronger choice for most hoteliers currently evaluating solutions. It offers a better understanding of ongoing performance and support, making it preferable for properties seeking a reliable, easy-to-manage guest marketing platform. However, if your hotel has complex marketing needs, multiple properties, or plans for deep automation, Ascent360’s capabilities justify its higher price and feature set.
La tarification des CRM hôtelier et marketing par e-mail est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $400/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Ascent360 et Sojern Guest Marketing Suite partagent 9 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatisation du marketing | ||
| Bulletins d'information par courrier électronique | ||
| Communication personnalisée | ||
| Module de commentaires des clients (cartes de commentaires/avis) | ||
| Modèles transactionnels | ||
| Segmentation de la fidélité | ||
| Tests A/B | ||
| Éditeur de modèles |
Affichage des principales differences. 1 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Ascent360 et Sojern Guest Marketing Suite partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel CRM & Email Marketing de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Ascent360 propose 6 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sojern Guest Marketing Suite en propose 33. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Ascent360 est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.8/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Ascent360 : Non. Sojern Guest Marketing Suite : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel CRM & Email Marketing proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Ascent360 a un HT Score de 0 et Sojern a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété