The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 21 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Getaroom se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 21 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 21 | 0 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Moteur de réservation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #38 2 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #37 3 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 1 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 avis | — |
| Luxe | #46 1 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #39 2 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge | #36 1 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #17 4 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #26 1 avis | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s success. Both ASI WebRes and Getaroom aim to streamline reservations, but they serve distinctly different needs. ASI WebRes, integrated within a comprehensive property management system, offers deep operational control and extensive features. Conversely, Getaroom is a standalone booking platform focused on consumer experience and wide inventory access. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
ASI WebRes is part of the larger ASI Property Management System, designed to help independent hotels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios manage reservations, channels, and operations in one platform. It boasts a 4.95/5 ease-of-use rating based on 20 recent reviews, with glowing comments about its straightforward workflows and quick support, making daily management smoother.
Getaroom, with zero reviews and a lack of recent data, currently has no proven user feedback to support its effectiveness. Its core strength appears to be offering a broad inventory of hotel rooms globally and a simplified booking interface, but without recent reviews, its actual usability and reliability remain uncertain.
This leaves you to ask: which platform truly meets your operational needs and guest experience expectations?
If your hotel needs a full hotel management system that consolidates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, billing, and distribution, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. Its 20 recent reviews confirm high satisfaction, especially with its ease of use and support, making it ideal for independent properties or multi-property portfolios seeking operational control.
On the other hand, if your primary goal is online guest acquisition with a wide inventory and minimal integration complexity, Getaroom’s extensive hotel listings and user-focused booking experience might appeal—though the lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice for reliability right now.
Thus, for hotels prioritizing operational integration and proven customer satisfaction, ASI WebRes stands out. For those focusing on broad inventory access and a consumer-facing booking platform, Getaroom could be considered, but with caution.
ASI WebRes offers a highly rated 4.95/5 ease of use based on 20 recent reviews, with owners praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and support responsiveness. Users highlight how it simplifies daily operations, from reservations to housekeeping, with very few complaints.
Getaroom, with no available recent reviews, provides no clear data on user experience or ease of use. Its interface is described as streamlined in marketing materials, but without recent, verified feedback, its usability remains unconfirmed.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes packs in 27 features exclusive to it, including mobile optimization, special offers, multi-channel booking, Google and Tripadvisor integrations, multi-lingual support, flexible rates, and social media integration. These features cater to operational complexity and direct booking optimization, giving it a significant advantage.
Getaroom offers no documented features beyond basic booking functions, lacking the extensive operational and marketing tools that ASI WebRes provides. Its feature set appears minimal and less suited for comprehensive hotel management.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Based on recent reviews, ASI WebRes scores a 4.85/5 for customer support, with users describing the team as professional, courteous, and quick to resolve issues. One review states, "Technical issues are resolved immediately, support staff are knowledgeable and friendly."
Getaroom’s customer support information is limited, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality. Its support reputation remains unverified, making ASI WebRes the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes connects with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto, and integrates with social, analytics, and booking platforms. This extensive partner network enhances its flexibility for diverse hotel needs.
Getaroom offers a single verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, limiting its integration options. Without broader connectivity, it may not fit hotels requiring multi-channel or third-party system integrations.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews and a 4.95/5 ease-of-use score, ASI WebRes's user base of independent and multi-property hotels consistently praises its simplicity and support. Hotels in North America, South America, Asia Pacific, and other regions report high satisfaction levels.
Getaroom has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences at this time.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable, suggesting they may require custom quotes based on property size and features. ASI WebRes’s value is reflected in its feature set and support quality, while Getaroom’s lack of transparency makes cost comparisons difficult.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, standalone booking platform without operational management features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs deep operational controls or proven support, especially given the lack of recent reviews.
ASI WebRes is a comprehensive hotel management and booking platform bolstered by a strong recent review base, high customer ratings, and extensive features. Its ability to unify reservations, distribution, billing, and guest management makes it suitable for independent hotels and multi-property groups aiming for operational efficiency.
Getaroom, despite its broad inventory and consumer-facing focus, currently lacks recent user feedback and detailed features, making it a less reliable choice right now. Its potential is evident, but without verified reviews, your hotel risks investing in unproven technology.
In summary, if your priority is a trusted, feature-rich booking engine integrated within a broader PMS, ASI WebRes is the clear leader. For hotels primarily seeking a straightforward, inventory-heavy booking platform and willing to accept the risk of limited recent validation, Getaroom might be considered—but caution is advised.
La tarification des Moteur de réservation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Getaroom |
|---|
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, ASI WebRes et Getaroom partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile optimisé/réactif | ||
| Offres spéciales et remises | ||
| Remplacements de pièces | ||
| Réservation multi-pièces et multi-tarifs | ||
| Réservations Google Hotel Ads | ||
| Réservations Tripadvisor |
Affichage des principales differences. 15 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 1 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. ASI WebRes et Getaroom partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Booking Engine de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. ASI WebRes propose 19 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Getaroom en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. ASI WebRes est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
ASI WebRes : Non. Getaroom : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Booking Engine proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) a un HT Score de 0 et Getaroom a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété