The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 21 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Confirmation emails and Pre-stay emails.
RoomStay se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 21 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 21 | 0 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Moteur de réservation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #38 2 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #37 3 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 1 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 avis | — |
| Luxe | #46 1 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #39 2 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge | #36 1 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #17 4 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #26 1 avis | — |
Choosing the right booking engine directly impacts your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and RoomStay aim to boost your direct bookings and streamline operations, but they serve different needs. ASI WebRes integrates tightly with a broader property management suite, while RoomStay focuses solely on converting online reservations. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
ASI WebRes features a comprehensive booking engine integrated into a wider property management system, offering over 25 exclusive features including multi-channel distribution, rate plan comparisons, and multi-currency support. RoomStay, on the other hand, is a dedicated booking engine designed to optimize direct bookings with personalized guest experiences but without additional operational modules. Given their differences, your choice hinges on whether you want a standalone booking tool or an integrated hotel management suite.
ASI WebRes boasts a higher review count (20 reviews in the last six months) and a recent surge in positive feedback, making it more reliable for decision-making. RoomStay, with no recent reviews, lacks the user feedback needed to assess its effectiveness. Are you willing to rely on a mature, well-reviewed system or seek a newer platform without current customer insights?
If your hotel needs a unified platform that manages reservations, front desk operations, billing, and distribution, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. Its integration with ASI PMS supports multi-property management, real-time updates, and extensive automation—ideal for multi-location hotels or those seeking operational efficiency.
If your primary goal is to increase direct bookings and improve conversion rates without additional management features, RoomStay could be appealing. However, given its lack of recent reviews and limited feature set, it is best suited for hotels that want a straightforward, standalone booking widget.
For properties seeking an all-in-one management solution, ASI WebRes is the stronger pick. For hotels focused solely on booking conversion, RoomStay might suffice—but with less proven performance.
ASI WebRes earns a near-perfect ease-of-use rating (4.95/5) based on recent reviews, with users describing it as user-friendly, intuitive, and quick to onboard. Support staff are praised for rapid, knowledgeable assistance, making staff adoption smooth. The onboarding process is rated at 4.8/5, reflecting a straightforward setup.
RoomStay has no available recent reviews or ratings to evaluate usability, making it impossible to compare beyond its marketing claims. Its simplicity as a standalone widget may seem straightforward, but without user feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes offers over 25 unique features, including Tripadvisor and Google Hotel Ads bookings, multi-room and multi-lingual support, rate plan comparisons, flexible rates, pooled inventory, and integrated guest communication tools. These features extend beyond simple booking, giving your hotel a versatile platform for marketing, revenue management, and customer engagement.
RoomStay, by contrast, offers no listed features beyond its core booking engine. Its focus is on providing a seamless booking experience, but it lacks the depth of functionality found in ASI WebRes. If you require advanced features like multi-channel distribution or rate management, ASI WebRes is the clear winner.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Customer support ratings favor ASI WebRes, with a 4.85/5 score based on recent reviews. Hoteliers praise its prompt, professional, and knowledgeable support team, with one review stating, "Technical issues are resolved immediately and staff is courteous."
RoomStay has no recent reviews or ratings available, so its support quality cannot be assessed. As a newer, less-reviewed platform, it’s uncertain how responsive or helpful their support truly is.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes integrates with 19 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Triptease, and D-Edge. It supports a wide array of third-party systems, from channel managers to analytics platforms, allowing for a highly connected hotel tech stack.
RoomStay has 7 verified integrations, including key partners like Oracle Hospitality and Stripe. While sufficient for basic operations, it provides fewer options for expanding your hotel's tech ecosystem.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews, ASI WebRes’s ratings are highly reliable. Hoteliers appreciate its user-friendly interface and comprehensive support, with a net promoter score of 9.85/10 and a 99% likelihood to recommend.
RoomStay has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of feedback is a significant disadvantage when evaluating the platform's effectiveness.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable, and neither offers free trials. ASI WebRes’s costs are likely bundled with its broader PMS system, which may involve a custom quote, while RoomStay’s pricing is also undisclosed.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision will depend on your budget and whether you seek an all-in-one system or a standalone booking engine.
Not ideal if you only need a simple booking widget or prefer a free, lightweight solution.
Not ideal if you need a comprehensive property management system or extensive third-party integrations.
ASI WebRes offers a robust, feature-rich booking engine within a full hotel management platform, making it suitable for hotels wanting operational control and distribution power. RoomStay provides a focused, straightforward booking experience designed to boost direct reservations.
Choose ASI WebRes if your hotel needs scale, automation, and integration—it's the more mature, well-reviewed platform with proven results. Opt for RoomStay if your primary goal is a simple, effective booking widget; however, be aware it lacks the validation and depth of ASI WebRes, which could impact your long-term growth.
In summary, ASI WebRes is the better option for most hotels seeking reliability, extensive features, and support. RoomStay may serve smaller properties with minimal management needs but comes with less proven performance.
La tarification des Moteur de réservation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|---|
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, ASI WebRes et Roomstay partagent 2 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Dates flexibles | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Remplacements de pièces | ||
| Réservation multi-pièces et multi-tarifs | ||
| Réservations Google Hotel Ads | ||
| Réservations Tripadvisor |
Affichage des principales differences. 13 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 1 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. ASI WebRes et Roomstay partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Booking Engine de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. ASI WebRes propose 19 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Roomstay en propose 7. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. ASI WebRes est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
ASI WebRes : Non. Roomstay : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Booking Engine proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) a un HT Score de 0 et RoomStay a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété