The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 20 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Big Fish Internet se distingue .
Neobookings se distingue en ease of use and customer support .
Notes comparees basees sur 20 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 20 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Conception de sites web pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #12 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #13 10 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #9 4 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #18 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 11 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #13 7 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #16 3 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #10 3 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 5 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #17 0 avis |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel hinges on your priorities: ease of use, support, features, and overall value. Both Big Fish Internet and Neobookings aim to elevate your online presence, but they diverge significantly in their approach, user feedback, and market presence. Big Fish offers a comprehensive website management system, while Neobookings emphasizes beautiful, conversion-focused hotel websites paired with reservation tools.
Given that Neobookings has gathered more recent reviews and a larger number of favorable ratings, it currently provides a more reliable gauge of user satisfaction. This makes it the stronger choice for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, well-supported website solution. But does the difference in focus and support justify a decision? Let’s examine each aspect closely.
Big Fish Internet presents itself as a broad website management platform designed to handle everything from hosting to content updates, with an emphasis on security and technical control. Its reviews are scarce, with no recent data or user feedback to substantiate its performance, reliability, or ease of use.
In contrast, Neobookings specializes in creating visually appealing, high-conversion hotel websites complemented by reservation management tools. It boasts 20 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.8, and a customer support rating of 5/5, indicating strong, recent user satisfaction.
While Big Fish touts its platform’s security and scalability, the lack of recent review data makes it tough to assess its current effectiveness. Neobookings’ recent positive feedback emphasizes its support, ease of use, and ongoing product improvements, making it a more dependable choice for hotels aiming to modernize their digital presence. Are you willing to base your decision on an untested, unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a website builder that prioritizes intuitive design, fast onboarding, and reliable support, go with Neobookings. It is especially suitable for properties that want an attractive, conversion-oriented site with integrated booking capabilities, supported by a team that actively improves their product.
If your team requires a comprehensive website management system focused on technical control, security, and extensive customization—possibly for larger or enterprise-level operations—Big Fish might initially seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to confirm if it meets current industry standards.
For hoteliers seeking proven support, a user-friendly interface, and ongoing innovation, Neobookings clearly emerges as the better fit today. The platform's recent reviews and high recommendation rate solidify its standing as the more dependable solution.
Neobookings scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, backed by 20 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and excellent customer support. Users frequently describe the platform as “very professional,” “easy to navigate,” and “a pleasure to work with,” emphasizing the seamless experience and rapid setup.
Big Fish Internet, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its user experience. Its platform is designed for website management, but without recent feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Given the clear, recent positive feedback, Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers a suite of features tailored to hotels: a visually appealing website builder, integrated reservation engine, digital campaigns, and 20 verified partners including SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp. Its platform is designed to increase direct bookings and streamline operations.
Big Fish Internet claims to be a comprehensive website management platform but provides no specific features or integrations, and no verified partner data. Its feature set remains undefined, making it difficult to assess its capabilities or compare them meaningfully.
Edge: Neobookings, with its clear, targeted feature set and verified integrations.
Neobookings receives a perfect 5/5 support rating based on recent reviews praising its “super effective technical support” and “wonderful human team.” Customers highlight their satisfaction with ongoing communication, quick problem resolution, and proactive product updates.
Big Fish Internet has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine if it offers the responsive service that hoteliers need.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings integrates with 20 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp, making it highly flexible for hotel operations and marketing. Its platform supports a variety of digital tools that directly enhance booking conversions and operational efficiency.
Big Fish Internet has no verified integrations or partner data, signaling limited or nonexistent connectivity with other hotel tech solutions. This restriction could hinder future growth or integration efforts.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings’ recent reviews reveal an exceptionally high likelihood to recommend score of 98%, with users describing it as “delightful to work with” and “an example of how all companies should operate.” Its target segment includes a diverse range of properties, from luxury hotels to boutique and city center hotels, with positive feedback across segments.
Big Fish Internet lacks any recent reviews, ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment-specific performance. The absence of recent data favors Neobookings as the more trusted platform today.
Edge: Neobookings.
Big Fish Internet’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent pricing model—raising questions about value and accessibility.
Neobookings charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free trial, but offers a clear, predictable fee structure. Its focus on transparency and recent reviews of value for money (ROI of 4.74/5) suggest it’s a good investment for hotels seeking a balance of performance and affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel values ease of use, quick setup, or support—since these are unverified or absent for Big Fish.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly customizable backend or operates in regions where Neobookings has limited presence.
Big Fish Internet offers a broad, potentially scalable website management solution, but its lack of recent reviews or detailed features makes it hard to recommend confidently. Its focus on technical control might appeal to larger, tech-savvy teams but leaves smaller hoteliers in the dark regarding support and ease of use.
Neobookings, meanwhile, excels in recent customer satisfaction, ease of use, and support, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels today. It provides a well-rounded package—beautiful design, integrated booking, and strong support—that can help your hotel attract and convert more guests.
If your priority is rapid deployment, support, and proven user satisfaction, go with Neobookings. If you need deep customization and have technical resources, and are willing to accept the risk of limited recent feedback, Big Fish might meet your needs. For now, the data clearly favors Neobookings as the safer, more effective choice.
La tarification des Conception de sites web est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Big Fish Internet |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Conception et gestion de contenu
|
|
|
| Générateur de pages par glisser-déposer | ||
| Modèles de site Web d'hôtel | ||
| Capacité de marque blanche | ||
| Thèmes entièrement personnalisables | ||
| Compositeur d'articles de blog | ||
| Cartes d'attractions personnalisables | ||
| Personnalisation du site Web | ||
|
▾
Conversion
|
|
|
| Balisage AMP de Google | ||
| Storefront/Voucher Functionality | ||
| Mobile optimisé/réactif | ||
| Réviser les widgets | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Popups et alertes | ||
| Cartes d'attractions personnalisables | ||
| Personnalisation du site Web | ||
|
▾
Internationalisation
|
|
|
| Multilingue | ||
|
▾
Analytique
|
|
|
| Connexion Google Analytics | ||
|
▾
Référencement et trafic
|
|
|
| Intégrations de médias sociaux | ||
| Balisage AMP de Google | ||
| Mobile optimisé/réactif | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Plugins SEO | ||
| Cartes d'attractions personnalisables | ||
|
▾
Sécurité et conformité
|
|
|
| Protocoles de sécurité (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| Conforme à l'ADA | ||
|
▾
Vente incitative
|
|
|
| Storefront/Voucher Functionality |
Nous avons analyse 1 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Big Fish Internet et Neobookings Web Design partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Website Design de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Big Fish Internet propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Neobookings Web Design en propose 20. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Neobookings Web Design est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Big Fish Internet : Non. Neobookings Web Design : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Website Design proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Big Fish Internet a un HT Score de 0 et Neobookings a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété