Blastness CRS vs. Djubo (CRS):
Lequel vous convient le mieux ?

The Decision

Choosing between Blastness CRS and Djubo requires clear understanding of how each addresses your hotel’s needs. Both products aim to streamline reservation management and boost revenue, but their capabilities, market presence, and user feedback diverge significantly. Blastness offers a tailored solution predominantly for independent hotels with a focus on revenue management, while Djubo presents an all-in-one platform suited for a range of hotel types but with fewer recent reviews.

Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize more recent user feedback and a broader integration network or specialized revenue tools and an intuitive user interface. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?

Is Blastness or Djubo Better for Hotels?

Blastness and Djubo serve the fundamental purpose of reservation management but differ vastly in their approach and market focus. Blastness excels in revenue management and digital marketing tools for independent hotels, with a high HTR Score of 100 based on 72 reviews and recent positive feedback. Djubo, despite having a higher overall user rating of 5/5 from 19 reviews, has a lower HTR Score of 0, indicating less recent and less comprehensive feedback.

Blastness is praised for its user-friendly revenue systems and marketing capabilities, whereas Djubo is lauded for its integrated platform and multi-module approach. The real question is: do you need a dedicated revenue management system, or a comprehensive management suite?

Blastness vs Djubo: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs advanced revenue management and direct booking optimization, Blastness provides a specialized CRS designed for independent hotels. Its core strengths include real-time rate control, marketing tools, and detailed reporting — ideal for boutique and city-center hotels focused on direct bookings. Conversely, Djubo suits hotels seeking an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, and revenue functions, especially if managing multiple properties or requiring a unified dashboard.

For small, independent properties aiming to maximize revenue and control, Blastness’s dedicated tools are more suitable. If your hotel operates across multiple locations with diverse operational needs, Djubo’s modular, integrated system offers flexibility.

Is Blastness or Djubo Easier to Use?

Blastness scores a 4.89/5 for ease of use based on ongoing customer feedback, with reviewers frequently citing its intuitive revenue management and booking engine. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.94/5, reflecting a straightforward setup and strong support, though some users suggest interface improvements for navigation.

Djubo also earns high marks, with a 4.74/5 ease-of-use score. Users appreciate its clean interface and the professionalism of the training, but note that POS inaccuracies and feature gaps may hinder daily operations. Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Features: Blastness or Djubo?

Blastness offers 14 shared features and 4 unique ones, including geotargeted pricing, content management, TMC management, and a reporting dashboard. These are tailored for revenue optimization and marketing, giving it an edge for independent hotels focused on direct booking growth.

Djubo provides 16 unique features like a comprehensive channel manager, multi-currency, PMS, POS, group booking engine, and guest feedback management. Its extensive module set supports larger operations with diverse needs. Edge: Djubo.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Blastness or Djubo?

Blastness’s support scores a 4.9/5, with reviews highlighting professional, responsive assistance and ongoing support that keeps the system running smoothly. Users mention immediate responses to issues and helpful training, making support a key strength.

Djubo’s support scores 4.61/5, with feedback pointing to friendly service but some inconsistency in issue resolution, especially around feature gaps and reporting. Recent reviews suggest support is generally good but less responsive compared to Blastness. Edge: Blastness.

Which Has More Integrations: Blastness or Djubo?

Blastness boasts 15 verified integrations, including Oracle Hospitality, Hotelcube, and Vertical Booking, covering a broad range of distribution and management tools. Djubo has only 3 verified partners, with shared integrations being minimal, mainly TripAdvisor.

If extensive third-party integrations are critical for your hotel, Blastness’s larger network offers more flexibility and options. Edge: Blastness.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Blastness or Djubo?

Blastness’s reviews are more recent, with 15 new reviews in the last 6 months, contributing to its high rating and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like luxury and city-center hotels frequently praise its revenue tools and support.

Djubo’s reviews, while positive, are older and fewer, with a 97% recommendation rate. Boutique hotels and resorts in its user base value its all-in-one approach but report less recent system updates.

Given the recency and volume of feedback, Blastness’s ratings are more representative of current performance. Edge: Blastness.

How Much Do Blastness and Djubo Cost?

Blastness charges a flat rate of $600 per month without trial options. Its straightforward pricing emphasizes transparency and predictability for independent hotels investing in revenue-focused tools.

Djubo does not publicly disclose pricing, but based on industry context, it typically offers tiered packages without a fixed monthly fee, focusing on modular solutions. Exact costs vary depending on modules selected, which can make direct comparison difficult.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Blastness?

Hotels that benefit most from Blastness:

• Independent boutique or city-center hotels focused on direct bookings.
• Hotels that prioritize revenue management and targeted digital marketing.
• Properties with a small to medium portfolio seeking detailed analytics.
• Hotels that want a dedicated CRS for rate control and marketing.

Not ideal if:

• Your property relies heavily on third-party booking channels without the need for advanced revenue tools.
• You operate multiple locations requiring extensive PMS features outside revenue management.
• Your hotel prefers an integrated, all-in-one platform rather than specialized systems.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Djubo?

Hotels suited for Djubo:

• Multi-property operators seeking a unified management dashboard.
• Hotels looking for an all-in-one platform with PMS, POS, channel management, and booking engine.
• Businesses that need multi-currency, multi-lingual support.
• Hotels aiming for operational efficiency through a single cloud-based platform.

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel primarily relies on direct booking and revenue management tools.
• You prefer dedicated, standalone systems for specific functions.
• Your property operates in niche markets where specialized features are more critical.

Djubo vs Blastness: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Blastness is a niche CRS tailored for independent hotels seeking to maximize revenue through digital marketing and targeted management tools. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integration network make it a strong choice for properties focusing on direct bookings and revenue control.

Djubo offers a wide-ranging, modular platform suitable for multi-property operations that need integrated PMS, channel management, POS, and other management functions. Its comprehensive features are ideal if your hotel requires an all-in-one solution, despite fewer recent reviews and a narrower integration network.

If your primary goal is revenue optimization and direct bookings, Blastness’s recent performance and high user approval make it the better choice. For larger, multi-faceted operations needing broad management tools, Djubo’s integrated platform is more appropriate.

Final call: For most independent hotels prioritizing revenue and recent support, Blastness edges out Djubo. However, if your hotel needs a broad, multi-module platform, Djubo remains a viable option.