The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 105 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bookinglayer se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Digital Registration.
Sirvoy se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Messaging and Native Email Marketing.
Notes comparees basees sur 105 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 105 |
Apres analyse de 105 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bookinglayer apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Sirvoy mettent en avant customer support, ease of use, gestion des réservations. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Gestion des réservations
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface utilisateur et conception
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Limitations fonctionnelles
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et adaptabilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Coût et rapport qualité-prix
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #22 36 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #48 3 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #46 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #27 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #37 7 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #42 4 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #35 3 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #23 16 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #13 6 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #27 0 avis |
You’re evaluating Bookinglayer and Sirvoy to find the best property management system for your hotel. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and reduce administrative burdens—yet they approach these goals differently. Bookinglayer offers an all-in-one booking and activity management tool, while Sirvoy emphasizes ease of use with robust core features and channel management. The question is: which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs and growth plans?
While Bookinglayer attempts to serve a niche combining activities and accommodation, Sirvoy’s focus is on straightforward property management for small to medium-sized properties. Considering recent reviews, Sirvoy’s higher user ratings and more active customer feedback make it the more reliable choice today. But is it the right fit for your specific hotel?
Bookinglayer aims to serve adventure, wellness, and activity-based businesses that need to manage complex bookings, packages, and add-ons. Its features include digital registration and customizable trip packages, making it ideal if your hotel offers activities alongside accommodation.
Sirvoy, on the other hand, simplifies daily hotel management. It provides a user-friendly interface, online booking, channel management, and payment processing, tailored for small to mid-sized hotels, inns, and B&Bs. Given its 95 recent reviews and an NPS score of 9.41, Sirvoy’s support and ease of use are rated significantly higher. Do you prioritize managing complex bookings or streamlining simple operations?
While Bookinglayer's core focus is on activity-related businesses, Sirvoy excels at hotel-centric workflows. If your hotel combines activities and accommodation, Bookinglayer might seem attractive. However, Sirvoy’s recent surge in reviews suggests it’s the more trusted choice for general property management today. Which solution better addresses your core operational challenges?
If your hotel needs to manage activities, custom packages, and reduce admin time, Bookinglayer is the better fit. It’s designed to streamline multi-component bookings, making it suitable for adventure resorts, surf camps, or wellness retreats.
For hotels that seek an intuitive, reliable PMS with excellent support, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Its easy onboarding, high customer satisfaction, and comprehensive channel management make it ideal for small to medium hotels aiming for effortless daily operations.
If your property is more traditional, with straightforward reservations and limited activity offerings, Sirvoy’s simplicity and recent positive reviews strongly favor your choice. Conversely, if your hotel offers complex bookings or bundled activities, Bookinglayer’s specialized features could be more beneficial.
Sirvoy’s UI ranks near 4.65/5, with most recent reviews praising its straightforward, intuitive design. Hoteliers highlight its simple onboarding process and helpful customer support, with one reviewer stating, “Support is excellent, and the system is super easy to use,” and another adding, “It’s very user-friendly for beginners.”
Bookinglayer scores a 0/5 on ease of use in the ratings, indicating it struggles significantly with user experience and onboarding. Its interface appears complex, and the absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to gauge how well new users can adapt.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Bookinglayer offers 19 shared features with Sirvoy but has only 1 unique feature: digital registration. It is tailored for activity-based businesses, allowing selling trips, packages, and add-ons.
Sirvoy surpasses Bookinglayer with 24 unique features, including direct billing, guest messaging, online 24/7 support, native email marketing, task management, real-time reporting, integrated payment terminals, rules-based room assignments, and guest CRM.
Given the broader and more advanced feature set, Sirvoy provides more tools to manage a hotel efficiently. If your focus is core property management, Sirvoy’s features are more comprehensive. If you need activity management, Bookinglayer’s niche features might matter more.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy shines with a 4.85/5 customer support rating, and recent reviews praise its responsiveness and helpfulness. One user called support “superlative,” mentioning quick, clear responses that eased onboarding and troubleshooting.
Bookinglayer’s support ratings are unavailable, and reviews are absent, which introduces uncertainty. Its low overall rating suggests it may not offer the same level of support, making Sirvoy’s superior customer service a notable advantage.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Bookinglayer offers only 1 verified integration with a major partner, Cloudbeds, limiting its connectivity options. Its narrow integration scope could hinder property scalability or automation.
Sirvoy boasts 21 verified integrations, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Revinate, Oaky, and TrustYou, alongside booking engines like Bookboost and RevControl. These integrations facilitate broader distribution, marketing, and operational automation.
Given its extensive partner network, Sirvoy provides more flexibility to connect with your existing tools. If integration breadth matters, Sirvoy is clearly ahead.
Edge: Sirvoy.
With 95 recent reviews, Sirvoy’s user ratings are substantially higher, especially on ease of use and support. The platform’s NPS score of 9.41 out of 10 indicates strong customer satisfaction.
Bookinglayer has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to ascertain current user sentiment. This lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its reliability.
For hotelier ratings and user confidence, Sirvoy’s more recent and plentiful reviews put it ahead. If user satisfaction is a priority, Sirvoy is the safer choice.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Bookinglayer’s pricing starts at $600, with no free tier or trial info available. Its higher price point may reflect its all-in-one, activity-focused features but could be prohibitive for smaller properties.
Sirvoy charges a base fee of $200, with a 30-day trial period, making it more accessible for smaller hotels or those testing PMS solutions. Its affordable pricing combined with recent positive reviews suggests good value for money.
If budget is a concern, Sirvoy offers a more economical entry point with proven value. Bookinglayer’s higher cost might only be justified for hotels needing its specialized activity management.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily manages straightforward reservations or lacks activity components. Smaller, traditional properties seeking simplicity may find Bookinglayer overly complex and costly.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced CRM, detailed reporting, or complex revenue management. Larger hotels or those with sophisticated operational needs might find Sirvoy’s features limiting.
Bookinglayer is designed for businesses that combine activities and accommodation, offering specialized features like digital registration and customizable packages. Its steep learning curve and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable for most hotels today.
Sirvoy, with its 95 recent reviews and higher ratings, provides a user-friendly, well-supported property management system. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and affordability make it the more dependable choice for small to mid-sized hotels.
If your hotel primarily needs straightforward booking management and channel distribution, Sirvoy should be your pick. But if your property operates a complex activity schedule alongside overnight stays, Bookinglayer might be worth considering—but only if you can handle its complexity and cost.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers today, Sirvoy’s recent reviews and proven support make it the recommended option. Bookinglayer’s niche appeal may suit specific businesses but lacks the current trust signals of Sirvoy.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bookinglayer et Sirvoy partagent 19 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Inscription numérique | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Vue Calendrier |
Affichage des principales differences. 13 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, com... Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, comme la possibilité de regrouper des chambres en suites ou de proposer des forfaits, sont jugées perfectibles.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien... Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien et le besoin de fonctionnalités financières et de facturation améliorées. Des retours font également état du manque d'options CRM avancées et de difficultés d'intégration des fonctionnalités de vente incitative.
Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établis... Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établissement. Toutefois, certains utilisateurs aimeraient une plus grande flexibilité dans la personnalisation des factures et des options de facturation dynamiques.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bookinglayer et Sirvoy partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bookinglayer propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sirvoy en propose 21. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Sirvoy est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bookinglayer : Non. Sirvoy : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bookinglayer a un HT Score de 0 et Sirvoy a 85. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits