The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bookinglayer se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bookinglayer apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Bookinglayer and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline reservations and property management, but their execution and market presence differ significantly. Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews and a score of zero, offers limited feedback, making it difficult to gauge current performance. Conversely, Mews benefits from over 758 reviews, with recent feedback from nearly 100 hotels, providing a clearer picture of its capabilities. Does your hotel prioritize a proven track record, or are you open to an emerging platform?
Bookinglayer and Mews both serve the property management segment but diverge sharply in market presence and review activity. Bookinglayer’s zero reviews over the past six months suggest limited real-world testing or recent updates, while Mews, with nearly 100 recent reviews, demonstrates ongoing customer engagement and product evolution. Mews also scores a high 4.62/5, compared to Bookinglayer’s 0/5, indicating stronger user satisfaction. Given the recent review activity and overall ratings, Mews is the more reliable choice for hotels seeking validated performance.
If your hotel operates at a larger scale or values extensive integrations, Mews is likely the better fit. It offers over 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like channel managers and payment systems, making it suitable for mid-sized to large properties. Bookinglayer’s single verified partner and limited features (none exclusive) suggest it’s better suited for small businesses or niche operators with minimal integration needs. For most hotels, especially those seeking scalability, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and proven support make it the superior choice.
User experience ratings showcase a clear advantage for Mews, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score from nearly 100 recent reviews. Customers consistently praise Mews for its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal staff training. Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides little insight into usability, but its lack of recent activity suggests it may not be keeping pace with current UI standards. Edge: Mews.
Mews outpaces Bookinglayer with 39 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Bookinglayer offers no exclusive features, limiting its appeal to basic booking functions. Mews’s advanced features like integrated CRS, automated night audit, and guest messaging demonstrate its focus on comprehensive operational management. For feature depth and variety, Mews holds a decisive edge.
Mews earns a 4.27/5 customer support rating, with recent reviews highlighting rapid responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Customers mention that Mews support is responsive, even resolving occasional bugs swiftly. In contrast, Bookinglayer’s support ratings are unavailable, and its reviews are nonexistent, indicating little recent customer feedback. Given the recent review activity, Mews’s support is clearly more reliable. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 336 verified integrations, encompassing channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, giving your hotel extensive flexibility. Bookinglayer’s single verified partner and lack of exclusive integrations suggest a more limited ecosystem. The breadth of Mews’s integrations allows for tailored, scalable tech stacks, critical for growth and efficiency. Edge: Mews.
Hoteliers rate Mews at 4.62/5, with recent reviews citing ease of use, automation, and robust support across a variety of hotel types—independent, boutique, large chains, and hostels. Bookinglayer’s zero reviews prevent meaningful comparison, but the absence of recent feedback signals limited market engagement. Based on current data, Mews is clearly the preferred choice among active users.
Bookinglayer’s pricing details are unavailable, but it is implied to be less expensive than Mews. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no implementation or hidden costs. If budget is a primary concern, Bookinglayer might seem attractive; however, the lack of recent reviews and features means you should weigh potential limitations against cost.
Mews’s core advantage lies in its proven reliability, extensive feature set, and active customer base. It significantly reduces manual work through automation, supports a broad network of integrations, and delivers a modern, user-friendly experience. If your hotel seeks a scalable, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, Mews is the clear choice.
Bookinglayer may appeal to niche operators or very small businesses with simple needs and a tight budget. However, its lack of recent reviews, limited features, and minimal integration options make it less suitable for hotels aiming to grow or modernize their operations.
For most hotels, especially those requiring a trusted platform backed by active users, Mews offers a compelling combination of usability, features, and support. It’s the platform that will better serve your team as you scale and innovate in a competitive market.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bookinglayer et Mews PMS partagent 20 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Vue Calendrier |
Affichage des principales differences. 27 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bookinglayer et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bookinglayer propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bookinglayer : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bookinglayer a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits