The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,508 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Canary Technologies se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment & Authorizations and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Myra Self Check-in se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,508 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 1,508 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 1,508 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Canary Technologies apprecient surtout contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, tandis que ceux de Myra Self Check-in mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Notifications automatiques
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration technique
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Enregistrement sans contact pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 98 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 1042 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 228 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #1 105 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #1 573 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #1 680 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 116 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #1 1308 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 65 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #1 27 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #2 11 avis | — |
When choosing a contactless check-in solution, your hotel needs to focus on reliability, user experience, integration capabilities, and support. Canary Contactless Check-In has established itself as the leading option, thanks to its extensive feature set, high user ratings, and proven market presence, unlike Myra Self Check-in, which lacks recent reviews and a broader feature profile.
Both products aim to reduce front desk workload and improve guest convenience, but the depth of Canary’s platform makes it the more mature choice for hotels seeking a robust, scalable solution. Are you ready to see which one better suits your hotel's needs?
Canary Contactless Check-In offers a comprehensive platform with 16 exclusive features designed for security, compliance, and guest engagement, while Myra’s offering appears limited to basic self-service check-in solutions. With over 1,391 reviews and a recent surge of 368 reviews in the last six months, Canary’s reputation is well-supported by current user feedback, whereas Myra has no recent reviews or detailed feedback available.
Both products facilitate digital self-check-in, but Canary’s broader feature set, including document scanning, PCI compliance, and customizable questions, provides a more flexible solution for hotels with complex needs. Is your hotel prepared to rely on a solution with a proven track record and extensive capabilities?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich platform with high user satisfaction, go with Canary. Its core strengths lie in seamless integrations, security, and revenue-increasing upsell features, making it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels looking to modernize operations.
If your hotel prioritizes a straightforward, low-cost self-service check-in experience without requiring extensive customization or support, Myra might be enough—however, lack of recent reviews and a smaller partner network suggest it’s less reliable for larger or more complex properties. Given the current data, Canary is the better choice for hotels seeking a trusted, scalable contactless solution.
Canary boasts an impressive 4.82/5 ease of use rating based on extensive reviews, with many hotels praising its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers mention the system’s intuitive design and fast setup, often completing implementation within 20 minutes, supported by a 4.68/5 onboarding rating.
Myra offers mobile and online check-in solutions but lacks detailed ratings or recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess ease of use confidently. Edge: Canary.
Canary provides 16 features exclusive to its platform, including document and passport scanning, payment authorizations, multi-lingual support, and custom questions—none of which are available in Myra. It also offers features like a hotel website portal and marketing opt-in capabilities, adding flexibility.
Myra’s feature set appears limited to basic self-check-in and checkout functionalities, with no detailed feature list or unique capabilities listed. The clear edge goes to Canary for offering a more comprehensive, customizable, and security-focused suite.
Canary’s customer support enjoys a high rating of 4.69/5, with users praising its responsiveness and helpful onboarding assistance. Many reviews highlight how Canary’s support team resolves issues swiftly, which is critical during initial deployment and ongoing use.
Myra’s support ratings are unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews or user feedback makes it difficult to evaluate support quality. Based on available data, Canary’s support is undoubtedly superior. Edge: Canary.
Canary boasts 54 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality and WebRezPro, with three shared integrations. Its extensive partner network ensures easier integration into existing hotel systems, reducing setup friction.
Myra has only four verified partners, including Onity, and fewer available integrations overall. For hotels that rely heavily on integrated systems, Canary’s superior partner ecosystem offers a significant advantage. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s reviews, with over 1,391 ratings, consistently rate it at 4.68/5 overall and 4.82/5 for ease of use, with recent feedback emphasizing system reliability and support. Hotels across segments—from boutique to luxury—appreciate its effectiveness and customer service.
Myra’s lack of recent reviews and detailed ratings makes it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the strong, recent reviews backing Canary, it’s the more trusted product. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no free tier or trial available, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking a full-featured platform. No pricing information is available for Myra, which suggests either a custom quote or limited transparency.
Without clear pricing details for Myra, Canary’s transparent rate allows easier budgeting. For a scalable, feature-rich solution, the value of Canary’s investment is clearer. Edge: Canary.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or only needs basic check-in features without support for extensive customization.
Not ideal if you need advanced features, detailed security, multi-lingual support, or robust integration options. Larger hotels or those with complex operations should consider Canary instead.
Canary Contactless Check-In stands out as the more thoroughly reviewed, feature-rich, and widely supported solution, making it the go-to choice for hotels aiming to modernize their guest experience. Its extensive partner network, high user ratings, and proven market presence confirm its reliability and scalability.
If your hotel requires a secure, customizable, and well-supported contactless check-in system, Canary is the clear choice, especially given its recent surge in reviews and high satisfaction scores. Conversely, Myra might serve very small, budget-conscious properties needing minimal functionality, but it lacks the depth and confidence that Canary offers.
In summary, for most hotels looking to implement a reliable, feature-packed contactless check-in platform, Canary Contactless Check-In is the recommended solution. It offers a proven track record, ongoing support, and a comprehensive suite of features that will serve your property’s needs today and as you grow.
La tarification des Enregistrement sans contact est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Canary Contactless Check-In et Myra partagent 10 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de conformité PCI | ||
| Document & Passport Scanning | ||
| Gestion du cycle de vie des menaces | ||
| Préparation à la conformité | ||
| Sécurité Internet | ||
| Tests de pénétration |
Affichage des principales differences. 4 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
Bien que beaucoup aient trouvé la plateforme Canary conviviale, plusieurs utilisateurs ont signalé des problèmes d'intégration avec leurs systèmes de... Bien que beaucoup aient trouvé la plateforme Canary conviviale, plusieurs utilisateurs ont signalé des problèmes d'intégration avec leurs systèmes de gestion immobilière (PMS) existants et ont suggéré que des améliorations dans ce domaine permettraient de fluidifier davantage les opérations.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Canary Contactless Check-In et Myra partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Contactless Check-in de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Canary Contactless Check-In propose 54 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Myra en propose 4. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Canary Contactless Check-In est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Canary Contactless Check-In : Non. Myra : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Contactless Check-in proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Canary Technologies a un HT Score de 100 et Myra Self Check-in a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits