The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 152 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Direct™ se distingue .
Visual Matrix PMS se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Revenue Management Module.
Notes comparees basees sur 152 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 152 |
Apres analyse de 152 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Direct™ apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Visual Matrix PMS mettent en avant technical support challenges, interface conviviale, comprehensive reporting tools. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface conviviale
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Vitesse du système et disponibilité des fonctionnalités
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #18 23 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 117 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #11 5 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #16 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #12 38 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #16 17 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #1 124 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 44 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #7 141 avis |
| Europe | — | #32 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #18 2 avis |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Direct™ by Direct™ and Visual Matrix PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. While Direct™ promises a consolidated, next-gen platform, Visual Matrix PMS is a well-established, feature-rich solution with a proven track record. How do these differences translate into your decision?
Direct™ is marketed as an evolved PMS that consolidates essential features into a single, scalable platform, primarily targeting vacation rentals, B&Bs, and emerging independent hotels. Its focus is on automation, cost reduction, and generating more revenue via a built-in e-commerce website builder.
In contrast, Visual Matrix PMS has been around since 2001 and offers a comprehensive suite of over 55 unique features, including channel management, booking engine, and housekeeping modules. Its core appeal is to understaffed hotels that need an easy-to-use, integrated system with strong support for daily operations.
While Direct™ has no reviews or recent customer feedback, Visual Matrix PMS boasts 143 reviews, with recent comments highlighting its user-friendliness and operational efficiencies. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs for reliability, support, and proven performance?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, proven system with extensive third-party integrations and a strong support network, go with Visual Matrix PMS. It’s suitable for a wide array of property types, including branded hotels, motels, and resorts, especially if your team values detailed reporting and operational control.
However, if your hotel is a vacation rental, B&B, or independent property seeking an all-in-one scalable platform that automates distribution and offers a modern website builder without the complexity of multiple systems, Direct™ might seem appealing. But note, Direct™ has no reviews or customer feedback to validate its claims.
Given the current market data, Visual Matrix PMS’s proven track record and recent reviews make it the more dependable choice for most hoteliers. Its comprehensive modules and active user base provide confidence in its ability to support your hotel’s growth.
Visual Matrix PMS has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.43/5, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick staff onboarding, and user-friendly features like scheduling and reservation management. Many users mention how easily new staff can learn the system, reducing training time.
On the other hand, Direct™ has no publicly available ratings or reviews. Its claim to simplicity is unverified, and given the lack of feedback, it’s difficult to assess how easily your team would adopt it.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 55 unique features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, integrated payment, housekeeping app, revenue management, and more. Its flexibility allows your team to manage everything from reservations and billing to guest communication and staff scheduling.
Direct™ claims to be an evolved, all-in-one property management platform but offers no specific features or modules publicly. Its value proposition centers on consolidation and automation, but without detailed feature data, it’s hard to compare.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS’s support receives a high rating of 4.34/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, knowledgeable assistance and proactive communication. Users appreciate its 24/7 support and detailed weekly tips that help optimize operations.
As for Direct™, there are no reviews or independent support ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its support quality. The lack of customer feedback diminishes confidence in its post-sale service.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS integrates with 23 verified partners, including popular booking channels like SiteMinder, Vertical Booking, and Hotel Investor Apps. This broad ecosystem allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with distribution, payment, and guest engagement tools.
Direct™ offers no verified integrations or partner connections, limiting its ability to fit into existing hotel tech stacks. Without integrations, your team might face challenges in connecting essential third-party systems.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Since Direct™ has no reviews or ratings, it cannot be compared meaningfully. Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews and a recent NPS score of 8.81/10, enjoys a 92% likelihood to recommend among hoteliers.
Review comments frequently mention how Visual Matrix streamlines daily tasks, improves staff communication, and offers reliable support. Its high satisfaction levels across diverse hotel segments underscore its market acceptance.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Direct™ does not publicly disclose pricing details, making it difficult to evaluate its cost-effectiveness. Conversely, Visual Matrix PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no additional implementation or hidden fees.
For hotels on a budget or seeking transparent pricing, Visual Matrix PMS provides clear, predictable costs. Lack of pricing info for Direct™ limits its comparability at this stage.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
At its core, Visual Matrix PMS is a proven, feature-rich system with active support, integrations, and recent positive reviews. Its 143 reviews and high NPS score demonstrate consistent hotel satisfaction, making it a safe and reliable choice for most properties.
Direct™, lacking public reviews and detailed features, appears more speculative. Its proposition as a next-gen, all-in-one platform is promising but unverified in the current market landscape.
If you want a dependable, established system with ongoing user satisfaction, go with Visual Matrix PMS. It offers the breadth of features, integrations, and support that your team needs to run smoothly.
However, if your focus is on automation, cost reduction, and a platform tailored for vacation rentals or B&Bs, and you’re willing to risk unproven support, you might consider Direct™. But be aware, the lack of reviews and customer feedback makes this a more uncertain choice.
Ultimately, based on current data, Visual Matrix PMS provides a more secure and comprehensive solution for most hotels seeking operational excellence today.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Direct™ et Visual Matrix PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Moteur de réservation de groupe | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 43 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateu... La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateurs mentionnent des difficultés initiales lors de la transition depuis d'autres systèmes.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Direct™ et Visual Matrix PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Direct™ propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visual Matrix PMS en propose 23. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Visual Matrix PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.4/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Direct™ : Non. Visual Matrix PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Direct™ a un HT Score de 0 et Visual Matrix PMS a 80. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits