The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 152 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Fidelity se distingue .
Visual Matrix PMS se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Revenue Management Module.
Notes comparees basees sur 152 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 152 |
Apres analyse de 152 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Fidelity apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Visual Matrix PMS mettent en avant technical support challenges, interface conviviale, comprehensive reporting tools. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Fidelity |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface conviviale
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Vitesse du système et disponibilité des fonctionnalités
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #18 23 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 117 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #11 5 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #16 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #12 38 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #16 17 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #1 124 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 44 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #7 141 avis |
| Europe | — | #32 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #18 2 avis |
Choosing between Fidelity by Fidelity and Visual Matrix PMS challenges you to evaluate two very different solutions for hotel management. Fidelity, despite its comprehensive marketing, offers no recent reviews, limited ratings, and no verified integrations or presence, suggesting it’s not currently a practical option. Conversely, Visual Matrix PMS enjoys a strong, recent review base, high user ratings, and a well-established market presence, making it a more reliable choice for your hotel.
Are you aiming for a proven, widely adopted system with current user feedback? Or are you considering an untested product that lacks recent reviews? Your decision should hinge on which platform aligns with your operational needs today.
The recent reviews and higher overall ratings make Visual Matrix PMS the more credible and trusted solution at this time. Fidelity’s zero ratings and no recent feedback disqualify it from being a viable option for your hotel’s management needs today.
Fidelity’s complete lack of recent reviews or verified customer feedback signals the product is not actively supported or adopted in the market. It appears to be a dormant or inactive platform, offering no evidence of ongoing development or customer satisfaction. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, is backed by 143 reviews in the last six months, and an average rating of 3.75 out of 5, with 92% likelihood to recommend, demonstrating current user trust.
While Fidelity claims to be a management platform, the absence of real-world validation suggests your team would be relying on an unproven product. Visual Matrix PMS, with its extensive recent feedback, shows it is actively used, supported, and trusted by hotel operators.
Do you want to put your hotel’s management system on a platform with proven current usage? Or are you comfortable betting on a product with no recent validation?
If your hotel needs a basic, straightforward management system and you’re okay with a lack of recent reviews or support, Fidelity might seem tempting. However, for most hoteliers seeking a proven, extensively tested solution, Visual Matrix PMS is the better pick.
For hotels that prioritize reliability, recent updates, or integrations, go with Visual Matrix PMS. If your team values a platform with a track record of current customer satisfaction and a broad feature set, Visual Matrix’s active user base and recent praise make it the clear choice. Fidelity’s lack of contemporary validation is a major drawback when your hotel’s operations depend on software support you can count on today.
Fidelity offers no publicly available ratings or recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess its ease of use. Visual Matrix PMS, however, boasts a 4.43 out of 5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users describing it as “very user-friendly,” and “easy to learn,” thanks to its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Support and onboarding ratings are also high at 4.34 out of 5, indicating a smooth implementation process.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Fidelity offers no specific features or detailed description, suggesting a minimal or undeveloped platform. Visual Matrix PMS provides an extensive list of 55 features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, guest messaging, and housekeeping modules—many of which Fidelity appears to lack or not mention. This comprehensive feature set allows your team to manage multiple hotel operations from a single system.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Fidelity’s support quality cannot be assessed due to a lack of reviews or feedback. Visual Matrix PMS, however, scores 4.34 out of 5 in support ratings, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness and knowledgeable staff. Recent reviews mention support as “quick and effective,” although some note room for improvement during high-demand periods.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Fidelity has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or third-party tools. Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Hotel Investor Apps, and SkyTouch Technology, enabling your hotel to connect seamlessly with booking engines, CRS, and other operational tools.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Since Fidelity has no recent reviews or ratings, it cannot be rated by hoteliers today. Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews in the last six months and a 3.75/5 overall rating, has been well-received in the market, especially among branded hotels (rated 4/5 in some segments). The recent positive feedback and high likelihood to recommend (92%) confirm its current market approval.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Fidelity does not disclose pricing details or offer trial options, making its cost structure unclear. Visual Matrix PMS charges a $500 monthly fee, with no mention of discounts or tiered pricing. Its transparent pricing model makes it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly.
Not ideal if: You want a modern, supported system with active user feedback and broad functionality.
Not ideal if: Your hotel has extremely basic operations, or you’re seeking a free or very low-cost platform.
The core difference boils down to activity and validation. Visual Matrix PMS is a well-established, highly-rated hotel management system actively used by hoteliers worldwide, with recent reviews, extensive features, and a broad integration network. Fidelity, by contrast, shows no recent market activity, no reviews, and no verifiable customer support, indicating it’s not a viable choice today.
If your priority is a proven platform with current user satisfaction, go with Visual Matrix PMS. It offers the reliability, features, and support your team needs to run your hotel smoothly. Fidelity’s lack of recent validation makes it a risky, outdated option that should be avoided unless your hotel only needs basic, unsupported management tools.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Fidelity |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Fidelity et Visual Matrix PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Moteur de réservation de groupe | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 43 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateu... La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateurs mentionnent des difficultés initiales lors de la transition depuis d'autres systèmes.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Fidelity et Visual Matrix PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Fidelity propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visual Matrix PMS en propose 23. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Visual Matrix PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.4/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Fidelity : Non. Visual Matrix PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Fidelity a un HT Score de 0 et Visual Matrix PMS a 80. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits