The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 18 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Frontdesk Anywhere se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Hilton se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 18 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 17 | 1 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #36 13 avis | #60 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) | #62 1 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #35 2 avis | #52 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #48 7 avis | #60 1 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #41 6 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #53 2 avis | #56 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #42 2 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #26 9 avis | #40 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | #18 4 avis | — |
Deciding between Frontdesk Anywhere and Hilton OnQ hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and support expectations. While both systems aim to streamline hotel management, their approaches and reputations vary significantly. Frontdesk Anywhere offers a cloud-based, feature-rich platform with a strong user base and recent positive reviews, while Hilton OnQ is a proprietary system with limited recent feedback and a narrower focus. Which system aligns better with your hotel's priorities?
Frontdesk Anywhere emerges as the superior choice for most hotels due to its higher overall rating, recent reviews, and extensive feature set. Hilton OnQ, despite being built for Hilton’s large portfolio, lacks recent user feedback and scores poorly in usability and support. If you want a proven, well-supported PMS, Frontdesk Anywhere is the clear pick.
Both products serve the core purpose of property management—handling reservations, check-ins, billing, and guest data. However, Frontdesk Anywhere is a cloud-based system that integrates multiple modules such as channel management, revenue management, and guest CRM, all accessible from any device. Hilton OnQ is a proprietary system limited to Hilton’s properties, and it struggles with outdated architecture and poor recent reviews. Are you seeking a flexible, modern solution or an in-house system primarily designed for Hilton’s infrastructure?
The critical difference lies in support and recent performance feedback. Frontdesk Anywhere has 15 verified integrations and a recent review count of 15, with a high 4.47/5 overall rating and 90% likelihood to recommend, reflecting current user satisfaction. Hilton OnQ, with only one recent review and a rating of 0/5, is not actively endorsed by external users. Do you want a solution with active, current reviews and positive feedback?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a broad feature set—including channel management, revenue tracking, guest profiles, and online reputation management—go with Frontdesk Anywhere. Its support for a variety of hotel types, especially independent, boutique, and resort hotels, combined with recent positive reviews, makes it a practical choice.
If your hotel is part of Hilton’s chain and requires a system that integrates tightly into Hilton’s existing infrastructure, Hilton OnQ might seem appealing. However, given the lack of recent reviews, support ratings, and user feedback, it’s difficult to recommend Hilton OnQ for standalone hotels or those outside Hilton’s ecosystem.
For decision-makers prioritizing user experience, support, and a proven track record, Frontdesk Anywhere is the smarter, most reliable option. Hilton OnQ’s minimal recent data makes it less suitable unless your hotel specifically operates within Hilton’s ecosystem and is prepared for potential support challenges.
Based on the ratings, Frontdesk Anywhere significantly outperforms Hilton OnQ in ease of use—4.77/5 versus 1/5. Users praise Frontdesk Anywhere for its intuitive interface, simple reservation management, and quick onboarding, with reviews citing "user-friendly" design and "excellent support." Conversely, Hilton OnQ’s poor 1/5 rating reflects widespread dissatisfaction, with reviews describing its interface as "obsolete" and “not user-friendly,” leading to increased staff frustration.
Support quality further influences ease of use. Frontdesk Anywhere’s 4.7/5 support rating is bolstered by customer quotes like “Incredible tech support,” whereas Hilton’s 1/5 score and comments about “wasted hours troubleshooting” highlight ongoing frustrations.
Edge: Frontdesk Anywhere.
Frontdesk Anywhere offers 16 exclusive features, including a channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, online booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, and group management. These tools enable comprehensive operational control in a unified platform, with recent updates adding new functionalities.
Hilton OnQ, by comparison, lacks any publicly listed features beyond core reservation management, with no recent feature enhancements or integrations. Its limited feature set appears outdated, especially for hotels seeking modern tools like online distribution management or guest personalization.
Edge: Frontdesk Anywhere.
Customer support is a standout for Frontdesk Anywhere, rated 4.7/5, with reviewers highlighting “amazing customer service” and “prompt, professional help.” Recent reviews praise the support team for quick resolutions and attentive service, directly impacting daily operations positively.
Hilton OnQ’s support reputation is poor, with a 1/5 rating and reviews complaining about “hours spent with tech support” and “outdated systems that hinder service.” The lack of recent feedback and high dissatisfaction scores suggest Hilton’s support is unreliable for non-Hilton properties.
Edge: Frontdesk Anywhere.
Frontdesk Anywhere integrates with 15 verified partners, including prominent solutions like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate. These integrations extend its functionality into distribution, reputation management, and upselling—facilitating smoother operations and better guest experiences.
Hilton OnQ connects with only 6 partners, mainly Hilton-specific or older integrations, limiting flexibility. Its fewer options restrict hotels from customizing or expanding their tech ecosystem.
Edge: Frontdesk Anywhere.
Recent reviews—though limited—favor Frontdesk Anywhere, with a 4.47/5 rating and 90% likelihood to recommend. Independent, boutique, and resort hotels rate it higher, praising its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Hilton OnQ, with only one recent review and a 0/5 score, offers no meaningful recent feedback. Its reviews, when available, express dissatisfaction with outdated technology and support issues.
Edge: Frontdesk Anywhere.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable publicly. Frontdesk Anywhere’s model appears to be a subscription-based service without an upfront implementation fee, while Hilton OnQ’s pricing structure is not disclosed, consistent with its proprietary nature.
If cost transparency is critical, be prepared to request quotes directly from vendors. Frontdesk Anywhere’s flexibility and subscription model make it easier to budget for, whereas Hilton OnQ’s costs are less transparent and tied to Hilton’s corporate agreements.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Frontdesk Anywhere is the clear leader for most hoteliers today. Its recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and extensive feature set make it a reliable choice for independent and chain-affiliated hotels alike.
Choose Frontdesk Anywhere if you need a flexible, intuitive PMS with active support and modern tools that can grow with your hotel. Hilton OnQ, while suitable for Hilton’s own properties, falls short in support, usability, and current functionality, making it unsuitable for most external hotels.
If you prioritize proven performance, user satisfaction, and integration options, Frontdesk Anywhere is the recommended system. Hilton OnQ might only appeal if your property is part of Hilton and you are committed to their proprietary infrastructure—though even then, caution is advised given the lack of recent positive feedback.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|---|
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Comptabilité et Finance
|
|
|
| Facturation directe | ||
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
|
▾
Marketing et commerce électronique
|
|
|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration et configuration
|
|
|
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Basé sur le cloud | ||
| Sur place | ||
|
▾
Gestion de la clientèle
|
|
|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Réception
|
|
|
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Application mobile | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Gestion des groupes
|
|
|
| Fonctionnalité de groupe | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Expérience client
|
|
|
| Scanner d'identité et de passeport intégré | ||
| Inscription numérique | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Entretien ménager
|
|
|
| Module d'entretien ménager | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Paiements
|
|
|
| Terminal de paiement et lecteur de carte intégrés | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Gestion des réservations
|
|
|
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
La gestion des recettes
|
|
|
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes et conformité
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Assistance & Formation
|
|
|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
|
▾
nourriture et boissons
|
|
|
| Épopée | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Module Spa & Bien-être |
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Frontdesk Anywhere et Hilton OnQ partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Frontdesk Anywhere propose 15 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Hilton OnQ en propose 6. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Frontdesk Anywhere est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 1.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Frontdesk Anywhere : Non. Hilton OnQ : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Frontdesk Anywhere a un HT Score de 0 et Hilton a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété