The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 550 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Hilton se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 550 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 1 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 550 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Hilton apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #60 1 avis | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #52 0 avis | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 avis | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #56 1 avis | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #40 1 avis | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can dramatically impact operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Hilton OnQ, a proprietary system built in-house, has been the standard for Hilton’s vast network of over 2,000 properties but struggles with outdated technology and limited recent reviews. Conversely, HotelTime PMS boasts a strong recent review presence, a higher overall rating, and a broad feature set. Which system truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
The decision ultimately hinges on the scale and needs of your property, your expectations for modern features, and your support requirements. Let’s explore how each compares across critical factors.
Hilton OnQ is designed specifically for Hilton’s brand, offering integration within their ecosystem. Yet, its reviews reveal a significant dissatisfaction around outdated technology, with recent reviews nearly nonexistent. HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, has a 4.83/5 rating based on 433 reviews, with 27 recent ratings in the last six months, showing active user feedback.
The core problem both aim to solve involves streamlining operations—reservations, check-ins, billing, and guest data management. Hilton’s system appears to lack innovation, with users calling it “obsolete techno,” while HotelTime is praised for its real-time data, automation, and extensive integrations. Do you prioritize an industry-specific solution or a modern, flexible platform?
If your hotel is part of Hilton’s global brand or operates within their franchise infrastructure, Hilton OnQ might seem like an obvious choice. However, given the lack of recent reviews, poor ratings (0/5 overall), and consistent complaints about outdated tech, it’s clear Hilton OnQ is not keeping pace with modern hotel management needs.
HotelTime PMS suits properties seeking a flexible, cloud-based platform with extensive features, proven scalability, and recent positive feedback. If your hotel wants a comprehensive solution with active support and broad integrations, HotelTime is the clear choice. For boutique or independent hotels, HotelTime’s versatility and ongoing innovation make it the superior solution.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and daily efficiency. Hilton OnQ scores a dismal 1/5 for user-friendliness, with reviews noting the system’s obsolete interface and difficulties managing even basic tasks. Staff spend hours troubleshooting, rather than serving guests.
HotelTime PMS, rated 4.66/5, is praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and management-friendly features. Users say it’s “simple, clear, and easy to learn,” facilitating faster staff training and smoother daily operations. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ offers only basic, proprietary features designed for Hilton properties, with no unique features highlighted. In contrast, HotelTime provides 51 exclusive features such as integrated POS, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, revenue management, and automation tools—features that significantly enhance operational efficiency and guest experience.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set, including real-time reporting, automated night audit, and multi-currency support, makes it a stand-out choice. With more than fifty features uniquely available, HotelTime clearly leads in capability. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton’s support is reported to be lacking, with a rating of 1/5 and reviews emphasizing long hours spent troubleshooting due to poor interface and outdated infrastructure. Complaints include support delays and inability to address core issues effectively.
HotelTime’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick, responsive service and dedicated onboarding assistance. Clients appreciate their consistent availability and proactive communication. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ integrates with six verified partners, mostly limited to Hilton’s internal ecosystem and a few third-party vendors like Canary Technologies. Its integration scope is narrow, reflecting its closed, proprietary architecture.
HotelTime PMS offers 58 verified integrations, including popular tools like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, along with core partners like Canary Technologies. Its extensive third-party connectivity supports a more flexible tech stack. Edge: HotelTime.
Given the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, Hilton OnQ is rated poorly overall and is virtually unreviewed in the last six months. Conversely, HotelTime’s recent reviews (27 in six months) and 4.83/5 score reflect high satisfaction, especially among properties in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific.
HotelTime’s users—ranging from boutique hotels to resorts—report improved operational efficiency and management. Its higher, recent review volume makes it the more trusted choice. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely due to its exclusive use within Hilton properties. This limits direct hotelier access and makes comparison impossible.
HotelTime PMS charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no implementation or setup fees. As a fully cloud-based platform, its transparent pricing makes it accessible across various property sizes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hilton OnQ is a closed, proprietary system tied exclusively to Hilton properties, with outdated technology and very limited recent reviews. Its lack of features and poor user ratings make it unsuitable for independent or modern hotels seeking flexibility.
HotelTime PMS is a cloud-based, versatile platform with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 rating, and 51 unique features. Its active support, broad integrations, and scalability make it the clear choice for hotels aiming to improve operations and guest experiences.
If your hotel is part of Hilton and your priority is brand consistency, Hilton OnQ might seem appealing—but the technology’s limitations and user dissatisfaction suggest otherwise. For most hotels looking for a modern, reliable PMS, HotelTime’s extensive capabilities and proven user satisfaction make it the preferred choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Hilton OnQ et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Mieux classe pour
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Hilton OnQ et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Hilton OnQ propose 6 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 1.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Hilton OnQ : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Hilton a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits