The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 152 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Getabed Suite se distingue .
Visual Matrix PMS se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Revenue Management Module.
Notes comparees basees sur 152 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 152 |
Apres analyse de 152 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Getabed Suite apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Visual Matrix PMS mettent en avant technical support challenges, interface conviviale, comprehensive reporting tools. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface conviviale
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Vitesse du système et disponibilité des fonctionnalités
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #18 23 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 117 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #11 5 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #16 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #12 38 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #16 17 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #1 124 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 44 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #7 141 avis |
| Europe | — | #32 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #18 2 avis |
Choosing between Getabed Suite by Getabed Suite and Visual Matrix PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Getabed Suite emphasizes direct booking and operational simplicity, while Visual Matrix PMS offers a wider array of management tools and integrations. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Your team needs a solution that fits your hotel size, staff capacity, and strategic focus. Are you looking for a straightforward booking engine with minimal operational fuss? Or do you need a comprehensive system that manages everything from reservations to housekeeping and revenue? Let’s explore the key differences to help you decide.
Getabed Suite and Visual Matrix PMS target different hotel management challenges. Getabed Suite centers on increasing direct reservations through its high-conversion booking engine, aiming to reduce commissions and cancellations. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, offers a broad suite of management modules, including reservation, housekeeping, revenue, and guest communication tools, for active daily operation.
The choice often boils down to your hotel’s priorities: if your focus is on boosting direct bookings and simplifying sales, Getabed Suite's targeted approach is appealing. Conversely, if your team needs a robust, all-in-one system to handle complex operations and multiple departments, Visual Matrix PMS is more suitable. Are you prioritizing sales growth or operational efficiency?
If your hotel needs to ramp up direct online reservations without paying commissions, go with Getabed Suite. Its core strength is a high-conversion booking engine designed to increase reservations directly on your website, making it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels focusing on marketing and sales.
If your hotel requires a full-featured management platform capable of handling reservations, housekeeping, revenue management, and guest communication, Visual Matrix PMS is the better choice. It supports a broad range of functionalities, especially beneficial for branded hotels or properties with complex operational needs.
For hotels aiming to grow their direct bookings and keep operations simple, Getabed Suite excels. But if your hotel needs a versatile, feature-rich system to manage multiple departments and optimize revenue, Visual Matrix PMS provides more comprehensive tools.
Getabed Suite’s review score is unavailable, but based on its focus, it likely offers a straightforward interface centered on booking. Visual Matrix PMS scores a 4.43 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive dashboard, mobile app, and simple rate management. Users find Visual Matrix easy to navigate and quick to learn, reducing staff training time.
While Getabed Suite’s simplicity isn’t quantified, the limited review data suggests it may not be as polished or feature-rich as Visual Matrix. Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Getabed Suite offers no additional features beyond its core booking engine, focusing on increasing reservations and reducing cancellations. Visual Matrix PMS, however, boasts 55 unique features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, guest profiles, guest messaging, digital registration, and housekeeping mobile app.
Visual Matrix’s expansive feature set makes it suitable for hotels needing a comprehensive system that covers nearly all operational aspects. Getabed Suite’s focus on booking is a strength if that’s your primary concern. Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Customer support ratings favor Visual Matrix PMS, with a score of 4.34 out of 5 and recent reviews praising responsiveness and knowledgeable staff. Users mention that support is quick and helpful, though some note occasional delays in communication.
Getabed Suite’s support data is unavailable, making it harder to evaluate. Based on review volume and support ratings, Visual Matrix PMS clearly leads. Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified integrations, including popular booking channels, revenue management, guest communication, and payment tools. It supports seamless connection with tools like SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai, broadening its operational capabilities.
Getabed Suite has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or no connectivity to third-party tools. For hotels relying on multiple systems, Visual Matrix PMS provides significant advantages. Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
With 143 reviews and recent feedback, Visual Matrix PMS’s overall rating is 3.75 out of 5, with a high likelihood to recommend at 92%. Hoteliers across segments—particularly branded hotels—appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Getabed Suite has no reviews or ratings available, suggesting a lack of market presence or user feedback. Given the robust recent data, Visual Matrix PMS is clearly the more trusted product among hoteliers. Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Getabed Suite’s pricing is undisclosed, and it does not offer free trials or transparent quotes. Visual Matrix PMS charges a $500 monthly base fee, with no free tier, and no mention of additional costs.
The lack of clear pricing for Getabed Suite complicates value comparison. Visual Matrix’s transparent pricing model makes it easier to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Getabed Suite is a straightforward, niche solution focused on boosting direct reservations through a high-conversion booking engine. Its lack of additional features and reviews present a risk, but for hotels centered on marketing and sales, it could serve as a cost-effective tool.
Visual Matrix PMS offers a comprehensive management system with 55 features, broad integrations, and a proven track record backed by recent reviews. It suits hotels that need a full suite of operational tools, especially large or branded properties.
Choose Getabed Suite if your hotel’s priority is increasing direct bookings with minimal operational complexity. Opt for Visual Matrix PMS if your hotel needs a full management platform with advanced features and integrations to support daily operations and revenue growth.
In summary, Visual Matrix PMS’s larger user base, recent reviews, and feature depth position it as the stronger choice for most hotels seeking a versatile, well-supported management solution.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Getabed Suite et Visual Matrix PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Moteur de réservation de groupe | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 43 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateu... La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateurs mentionnent des difficultés initiales lors de la transition depuis d'autres systèmes.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Getabed Suite et Visual Matrix PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Getabed Suite propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visual Matrix PMS en propose 23. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Visual Matrix PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.4/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Getabed Suite : Non. Visual Matrix PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Getabed Suite a un HT Score de 0 et Visual Matrix PMS a 80. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits