The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 168 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Lightspeed se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Uber Eats and Delivery Menu Customization.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Server Level Reporting and Employee Reporting and Management.
Notes comparees basees sur 168 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $200/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 168 |
Apres analyse de 168 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Lightspeed apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel hinges on understanding how each solution addresses your operational needs. Lightspeed POS and Mews POS are both designed to streamline sales, inventory, and guest interactions but diverge significantly in their focus and market presence. Lightspeed is a longstanding, retail-focused platform with a broad base, while Mews specializes in hotel-specific features with a rapidly growing user community. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Lightspeed POS is primarily a retail and restaurant point-of-sale system that has expanded into hospitality, offering a wide range of integrations and features. Mews POS, on the other hand, is built specifically for hotel environments, providing direct integration with property management systems (PMS) and tailored functionalities for hospitality. The question is: do you need a versatile, multi-industry POS, or a dedicated hotel solution?
When comparing the two, Mews POS leads in hotel-specific features, automation, and guest-focused capabilities, whereas Lightspeed shines with its extensive third-party integrations and retail-oriented tools. The recent review data strongly favor Mews, with over 156 reviews and a NPS score of 9.32, compared to Lightspeed’s zero reviews and 0/5 ratings. Would you prefer a solution backed by active, current hotel users or a platform still establishing its hotel market presence?
If your hotel needs a flexible POS platform with a broad ecosystem of third-party integrations, Lightspeed might appeal, especially if you value retail and food delivery features like Uber Eats and menu sync. However, if your priority is a hotel-specific system with seamless PMS integration, automation, and guest management, Mews is clearly the better choice, especially given its superior review count and recent performance.
For hotels looking to streamline operations with integrated online ordering, inventory, and room billing, Mews’s all-in-one approach makes it the more suitable option. Meanwhile, Lightspeed’s broader retail features are more useful for properties that also operate retail outlets or restaurants needing extensive third-party integrations.
Mews earns a high ease-of-use rating at 4.74/5, supported by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, well-designed onboarding, and cross-device functionality. LightSpeed’s UI ratings are not available but, given its zero reviews and no recent feedback, its ease of use remains unverified for hotel users.
In terms of onboarding, Mews's structured, well-supported process ensures quick staff adoption and minimal disruption. Lightspeed’s lack of recent hotel-specific reviews leaves its user experience untested in the hospitality context. Based on current data, edge: Mews.
Lightspeed offers 25 shared features with Mews, along with three features unique to Lightspeed—such as Uber Eats, Menu Sync, and Delivery Menu Customization—beneficial for integrated food delivery. Mews, however, provides four exclusive features including Digital Menus, Rewards Program, Server Level Reporting, and Employee Reporting & Management, tailored for hotel operations.
Mews's dedicated features for hospitality, like inventory management and real-time operational reports, give it a notable advantage for hotels. Lightspeed’s retail and food delivery features are less relevant for core hotel functions. Edge: Mews.
Mews scores 4.43/5 for customer support, with recent reviews highlighting reliable, solution-oriented assistance. Users praise its onboarding process and ongoing support, making implementation and daily operations smoother.
Lightspeed, on the other hand, has zero reviews and thus no recent feedback on support. The lack of current hotel-focused customer service data makes Mews the safer bet for dependable support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, significantly surpassing Lightspeed’s 28. Shared partners include major players like Oracle, Amadeus, and Bowo, but Mews’s broad ecosystem facilitates smoother hotel and restaurant workflows. Lightspeed’s integrations are mostly limited to retail and online food services.
This extensive integration network makes Mews more adaptable to hotel-specific systems like PMS, channel managers, and payment gateways. Given its broader ecosystem, edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 100/100 on the HT Report Score with a 9.32/5 NPS, reflecting strong satisfaction among current hotel users. Its recent reviews confirm high adoption and positive experiences across various hotel types, including boutique, city center, and conference properties.
Lightspeed has no recent hotel reviews and scores 0/5 across all categories, indicating no current hotel customer feedback. For hotel decision-making, Mews’s higher ratings clearly favor it. Edge: Mews.
Both platforms list a base price of $200.00, with no mention of freemium options, monthly flat fees, or implementation charges. Since detailed pricing is identical and no further discounts are specified, the total cost may depend on add-ons or integrations.
Given the similar pricing, the value comes down to features, support, and hotel-specific capabilities, which favor Mews based on review data and integration options.
Lightspeed’s broad ecosystem suits properties that need versatile retail and food delivery capabilities but may fall short in hospitality-specific workflows.
Mews’s focus on hospitality automation and integration makes it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, especially those prioritizing seamless guest experiences and operational efficiency.
The core difference lies in their focus: Lightspeed is a retail-centric POS with some hospitality features, whereas Mews is a hotel-centric platform with rich, integrated POS functionalities. If your hotel’s priorities include guest management, automation, and seamless PMS integration, Mews is the clear leader.
Choose Lightspeed if you need a flexible POS to support retail and restaurant operations within your hotel, especially if online ordering and delivery are key. However, for most hotels seeking dedicated, reliable, and highly-rated POS software, Mews offers a more tailored and currently supported solution.
In conclusion: Mews’s strong recent reviews, hotel-specific features, and extensive integrations make it the top choice for hoteliers today. Lightspeed’s broad versatility is less relevant for pure hospitality needs, and its lack of recent hotel user feedback makes it a less confident pick at this stage.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Lightspeed POS et Mews POS partagent 25 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Menus numériques | ||
| Personnalisation du menu de livraison | ||
| Programme de récompenses | ||
| Rapports au niveau du serveur | ||
| Rapports et gestion des employés | ||
| Synchronisation des menus | ||
| Uber Eats |
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Lightspeed POS et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Lightspeed POS propose 28 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Lightspeed POS : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Lightspeed a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits