The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Guestnet se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
Tourismart se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 165 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 165 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Guestnet apprecient surtout user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, expérience client positive, tandis que ceux de Tourismart mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Expérience client positive
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration avec des systèmes externes
▾
|
|
|
−
Notifications push et alertes
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 56 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #2 85 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #17 2 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #7 18 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #13 3 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 158 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #16 0 avis | — |
You’re deciding between Guestnet by Guestnet and Tourismart by Tourismart for your hotel guest app. Both aim to improve guest communication and operational efficiency, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Guestnet offers a well-established platform with glowing reviews and robust integrations, while Tourismart markets itself as an all-in-one management system with limited review data. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Guestnet has established itself as a leading guest app platform with a high score of 96.36 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) scale, backed by 152 reviews—more recent reviews (51 in the last six months) strengthen its current relevance. Tourismart, however, currently has no reviews or ratings, making its effectiveness uncertain.
Guestnet’s reviews emphasize its user-friendly interface, seamless communication capabilities, and strong integration options, which have helped hotels streamline guest interactions and boost revenue. In contrast, Tourismart’s limited publicly available customer feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance, though it promotes an all-in-one approach to guest services and hotel management.
If you prioritize proven performance and verified customer satisfaction, Guestnet’s recent data makes it the clearer choice. Are you comfortable taking a risk on a less documented platform, or do you prefer a solution with a proven track record?
If your hotel needs a dedicated, highly-rated guest app with proven integrations and a track record of increasing guest satisfaction, go with Guestnet. It’s especially suitable for hotels that value seamless digital communication, automated guest information, and strong PMS integrations—its 20 verified partners, including Mews and ASA Hotelsoftware, attest to its reliability.
If your hotel is looking for a comprehensive hotel management system that claims to serve both guest and back-end needs from a single platform, Tourismart might seem appealing. However, with no review data to verify its claims, it’s risky to rely on it for core guest engagement or operational functions. For certainty and proven results, Guestnet remains the safer bet.
Guestnet’s UI scores 4.74 out of 5, with onboarding rated at 4.66/5 and customer support at 4.82/5 based on 152 reviews—these ratings reflect a highly intuitive, well-supported platform. Users praise its clear design, automation features, and quick learning curve, which facilitate staff adoption and guest engagement.
Tourismart offers a tablet-based management system, but with no available user ratings, we cannot accurately assess its ease of use. Its marketing suggests a focus on straightforward operations, but without reviews, it’s impossible to confirm how simple it is for your team to implement and adopt.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet boasts 12 unique features, including request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, local recommendations, mobile check-in/out, multilingual translations, payments, and guest messaging—covering a wide range of guest engagement tools.
Tourismart’s offering appears to focus on request handling via mobile and tablet, but lacks the breadth of features seen in Guestnet. It does not disclose additional functionalities, which raises questions about its capacity to replace or complement existing management systems.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews highlight a customer support rating of 4.82/5, with feedback emphasizing helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable support teams that assist during onboarding and ongoing operations. Many users cite the support as a key factor in successful implementation.
Tourismart has no publicly available customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge support quality. This absence is a significant drawback when considering long-term reliability and assistance.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet integrates with 20 verified partners, including notable PMS and booking systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit. This extensive ecosystem facilitates smooth data exchange and automation across your hotel’s operational systems.
Tourismart currently has no verified integrations listed, which may limit its ability to connect with your existing systems. This could increase manual work and fragment your workflows.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews primarily come from small to large hotels across multiple regions, with an overall rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use and 4.82/5 for support—these are recent and reflect high satisfaction. Hotels like PURS Fine Hotels and ULRICHSHOF report tangible operational and guest experience improvements.
Tourismart has no reviews, so there are no property ratings or segment-specific feedback. This makes Guestnet the clear frontrunner in proven hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no free tier, trials, or additional implementation fees. Its straightforward subscription model offers transparency and predictable costs.
Tourismart’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, which complicates budgeting and comparison. The lack of clear pricing information can pose challenges for hotels seeking transparent cost structures.
Edge: Guestnet.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Guestnet is a mature, well-reviewed platform that excels in guest communication, automation, and integrations, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive feature set provide a strong foundation for reliable guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Tourismart markets itself as an all-in-one solution but lacks public review data and integration details, which casts doubt on its ability to deliver consistent results. Its focus on mobile and back-end management may appeal to smaller properties seeking a single platform but without proven customer feedback, its effectiveness remains unverified.
Choose Guestnet if you prioritize proven success, robust features, and excellent support. Consider Tourismart only if your hotel’s specific needs align precisely with its offerings and you are prepared for a higher risk due to limited publicly available validation.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Tourismart
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Guestnet et Tourismart partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| Annuaire des hôtels | ||
| Application Web | ||
| Commande de service en chambre | ||
| Gestion des demandes | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Recommandations locales |
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Tourismart
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Tourismart
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit... De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit par des commentaires positifs et potentiellement une augmentation des visites de retour.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains exp... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains expriment le souhait d'une intégration plus poussée afin d'améliorer l'automatisation et de réduire les tâches manuelles.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Guestnet et Tourismart partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Guestnet propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Tourismart en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Guestnet est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Guestnet : Non. Tourismart : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Guestnet a un HT Score de 96 et Tourismart a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits