The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 554 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Acomos destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
HOTELTIME destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile App and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 554 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 5 | 549 |
Tras analizar 554 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Acomos valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de HOTELTIME destacan user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #46 5 reseñas | #5 219 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 238 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 46 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #8 7 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #56 2 reseñas | #5 239 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #60 1 reseñas | #3 241 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #55 1 reseñas | #4 143 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #47 1 reseñas | #4 49 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | — | #52 4 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | #33 5 reseñas | #2 384 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #5 111 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #1 21 reseñas |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and profitability. Both Acomos by Acomos and HotelTime PMS aim to streamline daily tasks, improve guest management, and enhance operational efficiency. However, they diverge in their market presence, feature sets, user reviews, and support quality, making the decision more nuanced. Are you prioritizing a system with a larger, more recent user base or one that offers unique features tailored to specific hotel types?
Acomos is a UK-based PMS with a long history, boasting five reviews and a 3.1/5 overall rating, but its recent review activity is almost nonexistent. This makes its data less reliable for current decision-making. Conversely, HotelTime PMS has 433 reviews with a 4.83/5 rating and 27 reviews in the last six months, providing fresh insights into its performance. The recent review activity and high ratings make HotelTime's data more relevant for hoteliers today.
Both products aim to simplify hotel management — Acomos offers basic booking and guest management, while HotelTime provides extensive modules for operations, reporting, and integrations. Acomos's older, less active review profile suggests it might lack ongoing improvements, whereas HotelTime’s large, recent review base indicates active development and support. When considering your hotel’s needs, ask: which system aligns better with your current operational challenges?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform capable of managing multiple departments and supporting growth, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—27 unique modules, high user satisfaction, and active development—suits properties of all sizes, from boutique hotels to resorts. Its large user base of over 650 properties across 20+ countries underscores its stability and widespread adoption.
If your hotel requires a simple, straightforward system primarily focused on basic booking and guest management, and you are comfortable with limited features, Acomos might suffice. However, given its small review volume, lack of recent user feedback, and lower overall ratings, HotelTime is the safer, more future-proof option. For most hoteliers, the decision hinges on your need for comprehensive operational tools versus a minimal setup.
HotelTime scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, supported by a 4.63/5 onboarding rating and numerous positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface. Users report that new staff can learn the system quickly, and daily tasks are streamlined. Support responsiveness and ongoing updates further enhance the user experience.
Acomos, with a 3.5/5 ease of use rating, receives mixed reviews. While some users find it straightforward, others complain about bugs, limited support, and difficulty in onboarding. A typical review quotes, “It is very easy to learn and to use,” but negative feedback describes system outages and poor customer support.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 27 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, multi-lingual support, spa and wellness modules, mobile check-in, real-time reporting, employee messaging, automated reminders, and online check-out. These features support complex operations and multi-department management.
Acomos offers only one unique feature: guest SMS communication, with the rest of its capabilities being shared or basic. Its limited feature set and lack of recent updates restrict its ability to meet the evolving needs of modern hotels.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s customer support is highly rated, with a 4.73/5 score and reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses. Customers appreciate the training, onboarding, and ongoing assistance, often citing support as a key reason for their satisfaction.
Acomos’s support ratings are lower at 3.3/5, with reviews describing delays, system bugs, and unhelpful staff. One hotelier complains, “Customer service and staff who know how to operate the system” are lacking, and system outages have caused severe disruptions.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular solutions like SiteMinder, Profitroom, and Bookboost, offering extensive connectivity across distribution, POS, and revenue management tools. Its rich integration ecosystem allows hotels to customize their tech stack.
Acomos has only two verified partners, including SiteMinder, with limited options for third-party integrations. This restricts flexibility and may require manual workarounds, especially for properties with complex, multi-channel distribution needs.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime's 433 reviews with a 4.83/5 rating reflect strong satisfaction across hotel segments, from resorts to city center hotels. Many reviews praise its extensive features, ease of use, and support quality, with a recent review stating, “HotelTime is a great tool for managing reservations from anywhere.”
Acomos’s five reviews yield an average of 3.1/5, with feedback ranging from satisfaction for its simplicity to frustration over bugs and support issues. Its older reviews, some from 2018, cannot reliably reflect current performance.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Acomos does not publicly list its pricing, and its lack of recent reviews suggests it may have limited or custom pricing models. In contrast, HotelTime charges a flat fee of $600 upfront, with no ongoing subscription fees, but this fee covers access to a comprehensive cloud system.
While the upfront cost for HotelTime may seem significant, its extensive features, support, and integrations often justify the investment, especially for larger or growing properties.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a feature-rich, actively supported platform with extensive integrations, suited for hotels of all sizes aiming for operational efficiency. Acomos, on the other hand, is a more basic system with limited recent support and features, best suited for small properties with straightforward needs.
Choose Acomos if your hotel requires minimal management tools and you are cost-sensitive, but be aware you may face limitations and support challenges. HotelTime is the better choice for most hotels that want a scalable, reliable, and comprehensive PMS with ongoing updates and support.
If your priority is a broad feature set, strong support, and proven market presence, HotelTime is the clear winner. For simplicity and budget-conscious setups, Acomos could suffice but with caution about its support and feature limitations.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Acomos y HotelTime PMS comparten 24 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aplicación movil | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Comunicación con invitados (mensajería SMS) | ||
| Escáner de pasaporte e identificación integrado | ||
| Gestión centralizada de usuarios y roles | ||
| Módulo de Spa y Bienestar | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 16 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Acomos y HotelTime PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Acomos ofrece 2 socios de integración verificados, mientras que HotelTime PMS ofrece 58. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 3.5/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Acomos: No. HotelTime PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Acomos tiene un HT Score de 0 y HOTELTIME tiene 92. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos