The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 544 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Actabl destaca en cuanto a interface usability & customization — especialmente para propiedades independent (5.0/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile access on any device.
Sweeply destaca en ROI , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Custom Inspection Checklists.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 544 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 516 | 28 |
Tras analizar 544 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Actabl valoran más su interface usability & customization, optimización de las tareas de limpieza, guest communication & experience, mientras que los usuarios de Sweeply destacan efficiency in operations, customizability and ui, housekeeping management. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Interface Usability & Customization
▾
|
+
Efficiency in Operations
▾
|
|
+
Optimización de las tareas de limpieza
▾
|
+
Customizability and UI
▾
|
|
+
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
+
Housekeeping Management
▾
|
|
+
Real-time Task Management
▾
|
+
Mantenimiento y comunicación
▾
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
−
Reporting Features
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Existing Systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Retrasos en el acceso móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Software de limpieza para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 24 reseñas | #6 13 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 241 reseñas | #14 13 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 119 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #1 92 reseñas | #10 2 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 232 reseñas | #12 9 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #1 255 reseñas | #13 10 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #1 188 reseñas | #15 6 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 33 reseñas | #7 13 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #1 417 reseñas | #20 1 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | #6 43 reseñas | #8 26 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #2 9 reseñas | #9 1 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #5 8 reseñas | — |
When choosing housekeeping management software, your team needs a solution that enhances communication, improves efficiency, and integrates smoothly with existing systems. Both ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl and Sweeply Housekeeping aim to streamline your operations, but they approach this goal differently. Actabl’s solution is more comprehensive, with a deeper feature set and a larger user base, while Sweeply offers a straightforward, cost-effective alternative. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both products address core issues like task assignment, real-time updates, and staff communication. However, Actabl’s broader range of features and extensive integrations set it apart, especially for larger or more complex properties. Do you prioritize a feature-rich platform, or do you prefer a simpler, more affordable option?
ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl is designed for hotels that require advanced features, extensive integrations, and multi-property management. Its robust toolset, including modules for lost & found, preventative maintenance, and detailed analytics, caters to larger hotels or chains with complex operations. Conversely, Sweeply Housekeeping emphasizes simplicity, ease of use, and affordability, making it better suited for small to mid-sized hotels or properties seeking quick deployment.
While ALICE boasts a higher overall rating (4.7/5 from 413 reviews and a recent score of 116 reviews), Sweeply’s limited review count (27 reviews) and a lower overall rating (78.7/100 HT Score) make its data less current and less reliable. Do you need a platform with proven stability and a broad feature set, or is a lightweight solution enough?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform with extensive features—such as real-time task tracking, multi-property oversight, and advanced reporting—ALICE is the clear choice. Its large user base and high review volume (over 400 reviews, with recent feedback from 116) confirm its reliability and widespread adoption. For hotels that value detailed analytics, multilingual support, and integrations with PMS like Opera or Mews, ALICE delivers.
If your focus is on simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and rapid onboarding, Sweeply is ideal. Its core functionality covers essential housekeeping tasks, and its ease of use (average 4.85/5 rating) makes staff adoption straightforward. However, its limited integrations and feature depth mean it may not support complex operational needs. Are you looking for a full-featured system or a straightforward tool that gets the job done?
ALICE’s user interface is generally rated highly (4.71/5), but some users report interface clutter and occasional lag, especially during peak times. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.54/5, with some clients mentioning initial confusion during implementation. On the other hand, Sweeply scores slightly higher on ease of use (4.85/5) and onboarding (4.67/5), with reviews emphasizing its straightforward, intuitive design and quick staff adoption.
While ALICE’s extensive features can overwhelm new users, Sweeply’s simplicity allows for faster training and less resistance from staff. However, ALICE’s mobile accessibility is praised for real-time updates, which enhances operational flow. Edge: Sweeply.
ALICE offers 20 exclusive features, including real-time task tracking, a virtual logbook, preventative maintenance, and an open API, supporting larger hotels’ complex needs. Its comprehensive suite covers many operational areas beyond housekeeping, making it suitable for properties requiring detailed oversight and automation. Sweeply has only one unique feature: custom inspection checklists, with 13 features in total, mainly focusing on task assignment and basic communication.
If your hotel demands advanced analytics, multi-property management, and automation, ALICE’s feature set will serve you better. For straightforward housekeeping management without the need for extensive customization, Sweeply’s minimal but effective feature list may suffice. Which level of functionality aligns with your operational complexity?
ALICE’s support rating is 4.48/5, with users praising their responsiveness and helpfulness, though some mention long response times (up to two days). Clients note that ALICE’s onboarding can be improved, but overall, support is considered reliable for resolving issues. Conversely, Sweeply scores slightly higher at 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, helpful support and quick issue resolution, especially during initial setup.
Given the higher recent review count and support rating, ALICE’s support feels more proven at scale. However, Sweeply’s smaller team offers a more personalized experience. Edge: Sweeply.
ALICE boasts 100 verified integrations, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Cloudbeds, with 4 shared partners with Sweeply. These integrations support a wide range of operational needs, from property management to point-of-sale. Sweeply, with 11 verified partners, focuses mainly on integrations with Apaleo, Guesty, and Beds24, but fewer options mean less flexibility for complex systems.
If your property relies on multiple third-party integrations, ALICE’s extensive partner network offers more options and flexibility. For properties with simpler setup needs, Sweeply’s limited but targeted integrations might be enough. Which integration ecosystem do you need?
ALICE’s high review count (413 reviews) and recent feedback (116 reviews in the last 6 months) provide a more current picture of user satisfaction. Its overall rating of 4.7/5 underscores strong approval across hotel types, especially resorts and branded hotels. Sweeply’s 27 reviews, all from the last six months, give a snapshot of satisfaction but lack the breadth to be conclusive.
Larger properties and chains tend to rate ALICE higher, valuing its depth and robust support. Smaller hotels or independent properties appreciate Sweeply’s simplicity and affordability. Given the data recency and volume, ALICE’s reputation is more solidified. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s base price is $900 per month, with no free tier or trial information available. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and integrations, making it a substantial investment for larger hotels. Sweeply charges a lower base price of $200 per month, with no mention of additional fees, making it an attractive option for smaller hotels or properties on a tight budget.
While ALICE’s price might be justified for hotels with complex needs, smaller hotels will find Sweeply’s affordability appealing. Are your operational requirements or budget constraints the priority?
Hotels that benefit from ALICE’s extensive functionalities include:
Not ideal if:
If your hotel’s scale demands comprehensive operational oversight, ALICE will be a good fit.
Sweeply is suitable for:
Not ideal if:
If your hotel values straightforward operations and swift setup, Sweeply is the right choice.
ALICE offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, proven support, and a large user base. It’s best suited for larger hotels or chains with complex needs and the resources to manage implementation. Its high review count and recent feedback reinforce its reliability for demanding environments.
Sweeply provides a streamlined, easy-to-use housekeeping solution at a lower price point, ideal for small to mid-sized hotels. Its simplicity and quick onboarding enable rapid deployment, but it lacks the depth of features and integrations that larger properties may require.
Choose ALICE if your hotel needs advanced automation, detailed insights, and multi-property management. Opt for Sweeply if you seek a cost-effective, straightforward tool to improve daily housekeeping operations.
In summary, your decision hinges on your property’s size, operational complexity, and budget. Both products can improve housekeeping workflows, but the better fit depends on your specific needs and growth plans.
Los precios de Software de limpieza rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl y Sweeply Housekeeping comparten 13 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Inspección | ||
| Libro de registro virtual | ||
| Listas de verificación de inspección personalizadas | ||
| Módulo de mantenimiento preventivo | ||
| Módulo de objetos perdidos y encontrados | ||
| Seguimiento de tareas en tiempo real | ||
| Traducción en la aplicación |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 9 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 2 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Sweeply is a game changer, Everyone is connected in one system now."
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining... The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining the user experience, particularly for new or less tech-savvy employees.
La herramienta de ALICE para la gestión del mantenimiento recibe elogios por su asignación de tareas y el seguimiento del estado, aunque algunos usuar... La herramienta de ALICE para la gestión del mantenimiento recibe elogios por su asignación de tareas y el seguimiento del estado, aunque algunos usuarios señalan la necesidad de mejorar las funciones de los módulos y la comunicación entre departamentos.
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in... The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in operational flow, though some face challenges with older system compatibility.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Users praise Sweeply for transforming daily operations by reducing errors, improving communication, and offering consistency across locations. The too... Users praise Sweeply for transforming daily operations by reducing errors, improving communication, and offering consistency across locations. The tool helps streamline team tasks, prioritizes operations, and overall increases productivity, leading to better guest experiences.
While users find the UI intuitive and easy to use, many reviews suggest enhancements in visual customizations. Critics desire more flexibility in alte... While users find the UI intuitive and easy to use, many reviews suggest enhancements in visual customizations. Critics desire more flexibility in altering colors, themes, and reporting dashboards to better align the tool with brand aesthetics and operational needs.
Reviews highlight how Sweeply effectively manages housekeeping tasks, consolidates schedules, and assigns daily activities, resulting in meticulous ro... Reviews highlight how Sweeply effectively manages housekeeping tasks, consolidates schedules, and assigns daily activities, resulting in meticulous room management and cleanliness. This organization translates to noticeable improvements in guest experiences.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Many reviews point out that Sweeply's reporting features are basic and could benefit from additional analytics and filtering options. Users express a... Many reviews point out that Sweeply's reporting features are basic and could benefit from additional analytics and filtering options. Users express a need for more detailed and customizable reporting tools to gain better insights into performance metrics over time.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl y Sweeply Housekeeping comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Housekeeping Software, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl ofrece 100 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Sweeply Housekeeping ofrece 11. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Sweeply Housekeeping lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.9/5 vs 4.7/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl: No. Sweeply Housekeeping: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Housekeeping Software ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Actabl tiene un HT Score de 99 y Sweeply tiene 78. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos