The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Assa Abloy destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Assa Abloy valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations and guest experiences. Both Assa Abloy and Mews aim to address operational inefficiencies, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Assa Abloy, a legacy brand, is virtually unreviewed and untested in the current PMS landscape, whereas Mews offers a modern, cloud-based platform with hundreds of recent reviews. Will you entrust your hotel to a largely untested system or opt for a proven solution with robust user feedback?
Assa Abloy, traditionally known for locks and access control, has entered the PMS space but with no reviews or clear user feedback, making it impossible to gauge real-world performance. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 recent reviews with a stellar overall rating of 4.62/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (93%). The recent reviews for Mews highlight its ease of use, extensive integrations, and operational automation, whereas Assa Abloy remains largely untested in this market segment.
While Assa Abloy’s offering might be rooted in physical security, its lack of recent user feedback leaves hoteliers uncertain about its effectiveness or adaptability. Mews’s proven track record demonstrates consistent customer satisfaction across diverse property types. Are you willing to gamble on an unproven legacy brand, or do you prefer a platform with validated success and ongoing innovation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich, cloud-based PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It is especially suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and chains looking for automation, real-time data, and guest-centric tools. Conversely, if your hotel primarily seeks a legacy, security-focused solution with a focus on physical access, Assa Abloy might seem appealing — but the lack of recent reviews and proven functionality makes this risky.
For hotels prioritizing ease of management, guest satisfaction, and operational scalability, Mews provides a clear advantage with its 59 unique features, extensive support, and continuous updates. Assa Abloy’s absence of review data and unclear feature set make it a less reliable choice for modern hotel management. Which platform aligns with your hotel’s growth and innovation goals?
Mews consistently receives high praise for its user-friendly interface, earning a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews. Hotels describe it as intuitive, with a modern design that minimizes training time, and staff often note that they can operate the system with minimal onboarding. Assa Abloy, devoid of reviews, offers no comparable user feedback or usability ratings, leaving its ease of use highly uncertain.
Mews also scores well on onboarding, with many users highlighting smooth implementation and ongoing support. In contrast, Assa Abloy’s lack of recent feedback means you cannot gauge how easily your team would adopt its system. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides 59 integrations and features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, flexible booking engine, online check-in, automated reminders, and detailed reporting—features critical for modern hospitality. Assa Abloy offers no listed features or integrations, raising questions about its capabilities outside physical access control.
The extensive feature set of Mews supports a fully digital, guest-centric operation, while Assa Abloy’s offering appears limited to basic or physical security functions. For comprehensive operational management, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings include a 4.27/5 score based on recent reviews, with users praising their responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Many mention that support is a key factor in their positive experience, even when encountering minor bugs, which are typically addressed quickly.
Assa Abloy does not provide recent review data or specific support feedback, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given Mews’s established reputation for customer service, it’s the safer choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 through its marketplace, with notable partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. These integrations cover revenue management, PMS, channel management, POS, guest communication, and more.
Assa Abloy has only one verified partner listed, which is insufficient for a modern hotel operation that relies on a connected tech ecosystem. For flexibility and scale, Mews stands far ahead. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews show an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, based on 98 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers across segments—boutique, city center, hostel, and chain hotels—praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Assa Abloy, lacking reviews, cannot be rated. Its unproven status in the hotel PMS market makes Mews the clear favorite for hoteliers seeking validated satisfaction and ongoing updates. Edge: Mews.
Assa Abloy’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there’s no indication of a trial or transparent fee structure. Mews charges a flat monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional costs listed.
The opaque pricing of Assa Abloy makes budgeting difficult, while Mews’s transparent model allows hotels to plan more effectively. Given the lack of data for Assa Abloy, Mews offers a clearer value proposition.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews offers a comprehensive, cloud-native PMS with broad integrations, proven user satisfaction, and continuous innovation. It supports operational agility and enhances guest experiences, making it ideal for the modern hotel.
Assa Abloy, largely untested in this space, might serve niche physical security needs but lacks the features, support, and user feedback to make it a reliable PMS choice. For scalable growth, automation, and a digital-first approach, Mews is the clear winner.
When to choose Mews:
When to consider Assa Abloy:
Conclusion:
For most hotels seeking a modern, reliable, and scalable PMS, Mews stands out as the smarter choice backed by recent reviews and extensive features. Assa Abloy remains unproven, and its lack of current user feedback makes it a risky gamble for your hotel’s future.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Assa Abloy |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Assa Abloy y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Assa Abloy y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Assa Abloy ofrece 1 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Assa Abloy: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Assa Abloy tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos