The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 1,436 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
HOTELTIME destaca en customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Spa & Wellness Module.
Mews destaca en cuanto a ease of use — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 1,436 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 549 | 887 |
Tras analizar 1,436 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de HOTELTIME valoran más su user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics, mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #5 219 reseñas | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 238 reseñas | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 46 reseñas | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #8 7 reseñas | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 reseñas | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #3 241 reseñas | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #4 143 reseñas | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #4 49 reseñas | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #52 4 reseñas | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 reseñas | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #5 111 reseñas | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #1 21 reseñas | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing the right PMS can transform your hotel operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelTime PMS and Mews PMS both aim to streamline these areas, but differences in scale, features, and recent reviews reveal which may better suit your needs.
HotelTime, with a solid European presence and over 430 reviews, offers a comprehensive system for properties of all sizes, especially resorts and groups. Mews, with nearly 760 reviews and a global reach, is favored by modern hotels seeking automation, extensive integrations, and scalable cloud-based solutions.
Are you looking for a mature platform with proven stability or a dynamic, innovative system that adapts quickly? The answer depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and tech ambitions.
Both products serve the same purpose: managing reservations, front-office tasks, and operational workflows. However, HotelTime's stronghold is in Europe and the Middle East, with a focus on larger properties and chains, while Mews is more prevalent in North America and Asia Pacific, favored by boutique and independent hotels.
HotelTime’s recent reviews are fewer—27 in the last six months—limiting insight into its current performance, whereas Mews’s 98 recent reviews provide a clearer picture of ongoing improvements and user satisfaction.
HotelTime scores slightly higher in customer support and onboarding, with 4.73/5 and 4.63/5 respectively, versus Mews’s 4.27/5 and 4.39/5. Yet, Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 still indicates strong user confidence.
Do you prioritize extensive regional support or a rapidly evolving platform? The data suggests Mews’s recent momentum and larger review base make it the more reliable choice today.
If your hotel needs a fully featured, all-in-one PMS with deep integration into spa, wellness, and complex revenue streams, HotelTime is a strong candidate. It’s suitable for large resorts and groups that want a mature platform with extensive capabilities and regional support.
On the other hand, if you require a flexible, innovative system with over 50 features, including guest messaging, multi-currency, and a broad marketplace of third-party integrations, Mews is better. Its user-friendly interface and cloud-based scalability appeal to boutique hotels, independents, and properties aiming for operational automation.
For hotels prioritizing robust third-party integrations, Mews’s 336 verified partners outweigh HotelTime’s 58, making it more adaptable to evolving tech stacks. Conversely, HotelTime might be preferable if your hotel values a highly localized solution with strong support in Europe and Middle East.
User reviews rate Mews at 4.7/5 for ease of use, citing its modern, intuitive interface that minimizes training time and simplifies daily tasks. HotelTime’s ease of use is slightly lower at 4.66/5, with some users noting initial complexity due to its extensive modules but recognizing that familiarity improves efficiency.
HotelTime’s onboarding experience averages 4.63/5, praised for personalized support, whereas Mews’s onboarding rating of 4.39/5 reflects some initial setup challenges, especially in larger multi-property implementations.
Support ratings favor HotelTime, with 4.73/5, praised for responsiveness and expertise, while Mews’s 4.27/5 indicates room for improvement but still a generally positive experience.
Edge: Mews
HotelTime boasts 50 shared features plus a unique Spa & Wellness module, enabling comprehensive management of additional hotel services. In contrast, Mews offers 50 shared features with 9 exclusive functionalities, including guest apps, guest messaging, automated assignments, shift planning, and SOC2 compliance.
HotelTime’s specialization in wellness and resort features may appeal to larger properties, but Mews’s extensive marketplace—over 1,000 integrations—enables highly customizable workflows.
When considering features like multi-lingual, multi-currency, and guest communication, Mews’s broader set of exclusive features and integrations make it more versatile for modern hotel needs.
Edge: Mews
HotelTime’s support scores higher at 4.73/5, with numerous reviews praising their responsive, knowledgeable team and dedicated onboarding. Users often highlight how HotelTime staff go above and beyond to ensure setup success and ongoing assistance.
Mews’s support, rated at 4.27/5, is generally appreciated, but some recent reviews mention occasional bugs and slower responses. However, Mews’s rapid updates and active community mitigate these issues, and its support team remains proactive.
Given the more recent reviews and overall ratings, HotelTime’s support currently holds a slight edge.
Edge: HotelTime
HotelTime’s reviews are more recent (27 in the last 6 months) and consistently positive, especially among resorts and larger properties, with a 4.83/5 overall rating. Its traditional strength lies in stability and comprehensive features appreciated by established hotels.
Mews, with 98 recent reviews, has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.62/5 but dominates in user experience, innovation, and scalability, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Its reviews highlight ongoing improvements and high satisfaction with automation.
For properties seeking proven stability and regional support, HotelTime is favored. For those valuing flexibility, innovation, and a vibrant tech ecosystem, Mews is more highly rated.
Edge: Mews
HotelTime’s pricing is a flat $600/month without freemium options, implementation fees, or room-based charges. Mews’s pricing is higher at $900/month, with no trial or freemium offering, but it includes a broader set of features and integrations.
Prices reflect different target markets: HotelTime’s more straightforward model suits larger properties with predictable budgets, while Mews’s premium pricing aligns with hotels seeking advanced automation and extensive third-party connections.
Your decision may hinge on your budget and the value you place on features versus cost.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, solely budget-focused, or looking for rapid, cloud-native innovation.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions with limited Mews support or requires complex, bespoke module customization not yet available through integrations.
HotelTime offers a mature, highly capable system ideal for large resorts, chains, and properties needing comprehensive wellness and revenue modules. Its regional strength and customer support make it suitable for established operators prioritizing stability and local support.
Mews is best suited for modern hotels, boutique independents, and properties seeking a scalable, innovative platform with extensive integrations and automation. Its recent reviews and feature set favor hotels pushing toward digital transformation and guest-centric experiences.
If your hotel values a proven track record with regional support and extensive modules, HotelTime is the choice. If you want a future-proof, flexible solution that can grow and adapt quickly, Mews is the clear winner.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, HotelTime PMS y Mews PMS comparten 50 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Comunicación con invitados (mensajería SMS) | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de Spa y Bienestar | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Analizamos 16 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. HotelTime PMS y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. HotelTime PMS ofrece 58 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 4.7/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
HotelTime PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. HOTELTIME tiene un HT Score de 92 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos