The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Septeo Hospitality destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Spa & Wellness Module.
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Septeo Hospitality valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
You’re weighing between ASTERIO by Septeo Hospitality and Mews PMS to manage your hotel operations. Both aim to streamline your processes, but they diverge significantly in scale, usability, and overall market presence. Which platform will truly meet your hotel’s needs today and as you grow?
ASTERIO promotes itself as an all-in-one solution for diverse hotel activities beyond traditional PMS functions, while Mews focuses on automation, integrations, and guest experience improvements. Are you looking for a flexible, hotel-specific PMS or a broader operational tool with extensive third-party support?
ASTERIO positions itself as a comprehensive management tool for multiple hotel services, including accommodation, food, spa, shop, and activities, with a focus on developing customer experiences and revenues. However, it has no public ratings or recent reviews, which raises questions about its actual performance and user satisfaction.
In contrast, Mews boasts over 758 reviews, with 98 recent ones in the last six months, reflecting active use and ongoing customer feedback. Its 4.62/5 overall rating and 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating are backed by a broad user base, especially in North America and Europe, indicating a proven track record. Given the recent reviews and high Net Promoter Score of 9.12/10, Mews demonstrates a vibrant, supported platform.
Are you prioritizing a tried-and-tested system with extensive community insights, or exploring a newer, less validated solution?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based, scalable PMS with exceptional automation, integrations, and a focus on guest experience, go with Mews. Its extensive third-party ecosystem, over 336 verified integrations, and a proven track record across diverse hotel segments make it the safer, more adaptable choice.
If your hotel requires a highly specialized management system for multiple services like wellness, shops, and activities, and you’re willing to navigate limited reviews and unknown performance, ASTERIO could be considered. However, the absence of recent user feedback and a lower support structure suggest caution.
For hotels in North America or those prioritizing rapid onboarding, proven scalability, and ongoing support, Mews is the clear winner.
Mews receives a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick setup. Customers highlight how effortless it is to onboard staff, with some saying, “It’s very user-friendly, and staff adapt quickly,” which minimizes training time.
In contrast, ASTERIO has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its ease of use. Its focus on broad functionalities suggests a potentially steeper learning curve, especially without recent user feedback to confirm its simplicity.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 43 shared features, including automation, guest profiles, integrated payments, housekeeping apps, and advanced revenue management tools. It also provides a broad ecosystem of over 336 integrations, including channel managers, POS, and CRM systems.
ASTERIO claims a single unique feature: a Spa & Wellness Module, and positions itself as an all-encompassing platform for multiple hotel activities. However, it lacks the extensive feature set and third-party ecosystem that Mews provides, with only 13 verified partners.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is highly rated for customer support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews praising its responsiveness: “Their support team sets new standards,” and “Support has improved markedly over time.” Onboarding experiences are generally positive, with many customers citing quick and helpful setup.
For ASTERIO, no recent reviews or ratings are available, making it difficult to gauge support quality or onboarding effectiveness. Its smaller scale and lack of active feedback suggest it may not match Mews’s support standards.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, D-Edge, and Qualitelis. Its expansive marketplace supports over 1,000 third-party applications, allowing extensive customization and automation.
ASTERIO has only 13 verified partner integrations, limiting its connectivity options. Its narrower ecosystem may restrict your ability to automate workflows or connect with essential hotel tech.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and recent reviews from a broad range of property types—boutiques, resorts, city hotels—highlight strong user satisfaction. Notable comments include “Mews makes everything much easier” and “It’s the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market.”
With no recent reviews or ratings for ASTERIO, it’s impossible to gauge how hotelier perceptions compare. The lack of feedback suggests it’s not yet a trusted or widely adopted solution.
Edge: Mews.
Mews pricing starts at $900/month with no trial or freemium options, positioning it as a mid-range investment with a clear subscription model. The platform’s value derives from its extensive features, integrations, and support.
ASTERIO does not publicly disclose pricing details or trial options, making cost comparisons difficult. Its value proposition and pricing are unclear, which could pose risks for budget-conscious hotels.
Mews offers a proven, scalable cloud PMS with a broad ecosystem, rich automation, and high-rated support, making it suitable for hotels looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its recent reviews confirm its ongoing innovation and trusted performance.
ASTERIO emphasizes multi-service management, but its lack of recent user feedback, limited integrations, and support make it a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven results. Its niche focus may appeal to specific multi-activity properties, but caution is advised.
If your hotel values a mature, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, go with Mews. If you operate a multi-activity hotel willing to navigate an untested platform, ASTERIO might be worth exploring. But for most hoteliers, Mews remains the safer, smarter choice.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) y Mews PMS comparten 43 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de Spa y Bienestar | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Soporte en línea 24 horas al día, 7 días a la semana |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 5 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) ofrece 13 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality): No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Septeo Hospitality tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos