The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
AsyaSoft destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de AsyaSoft valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, the size of your operation, and your growth ambitions. While both promise to manage reservations and operations, their core strengths diverge significantly—AsyaSoft offers a minimal presence and limited features, whereas Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a large, recent review base. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s future?
AsyaSoft by AsyaSoft appears to target small, possibly local hotels with limited operational scope, evident from its zero reviews and lack of regional presence. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a presence in 54 countries, making it a globally recognized industry leader. Do you want a system that’s tried, tested, and widely adopted?
While AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, Mews’s high scores in ease of use, support, and value—each above 4.2/5—highlight its maturity and user satisfaction. Mews’s recent reviews, especially those from hotels emphasizing enhanced operational efficiency, reinforce its reliability. Are you ready to invest in a proven platform with a broad ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich system capable of scaling across multiple properties, Mews is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and chains eager for automation, integrations, and modern guest experiences. If your hotel is small, with limited operations and no regional expansion plans, AsyaSoft could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews raises questions about long-term viability.
For hotels prioritizing guest convenience, automation, and growth, Mews’s extensive feature set—including booking engine, guest CRM, channel management, and reporting—delivers immediate value. Conversely, AsyaSoft’s limited profile suggests it’s more of a local, perhaps legacy, solution without the capacity to support complex or expanding operations. Which aligns better with your strategic goals?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hotels like Leven Manchester and The Neighborhood Hotel commend its modern design and simple navigation, with many noting quick setup times. Its cloud-native platform allows staff to work remotely, further enhancing usability.
AsyaSoft’s UI and onboarding experience are unreviewed, but given its negligible review count, user feedback is unavailable. The absence of recent data suggests it may lack the refinements and modern design features that make Mews so user-friendly. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, integrated channel management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Its open API and marketplace enable extensive customization, with integrations that cover payments, housekeeping, group bookings, and more.
AsyaSoft has no verified features or integrations listed, indicating a minimal or legacy system that likely lacks the advanced functionalities needed for today’s hospitality demands. The sheer volume and depth of Mews’s features provide your team with tools to optimize operations and guest experiences. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews reflecting prompt responsiveness and ongoing updates. Hotels like The Julius Prague and Hotel Lancaster appreciate Mews’s support teams, citing quick bug fixes and helpful onboarding, especially through its 24/7 live chat and onboarding programs.
AsyaSoft’s review score is unrecorded; with no recent reviews, support quality remains unverified. The lack of feedback and regional presence suggests limited support options, which could hinder your team’s adoption and troubleshooting. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, revenue management systems, and payment providers. Its open API and Mews Marketplace offer access to over 1,000 third-party apps, enabling a tailored tech stack for your hotel.
AsyaSoft has no listed verified integrations, likely limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels seeking a connected, scalable ecosystem, Mews’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 reviews, Mews’s hotelier ratings—4.62/5 overall—are both recent and consistent. Hotels across segments, from boutique to large chains, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, and there are no recent reviews or property ratings to consider. The Mews user base’s positive feedback underscores its reliability for modern hotels. Edge: Mews.
AsyaSoft does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or limited model, possibly with high customization costs. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or setup fees, providing a transparent, predictable cost structure.
Without clear pricing for AsyaSoft, it’s difficult to compare value directly. However, Mews’s known pricing aligns with its comprehensive features and global support, making it a worthwhile investment for scalable growth. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for expansion, automation, or integration with third-party tools. AsyaSoft’s limited features and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable for modern, growth-oriented operations.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a legacy system with limited support. Mews’s broad capabilities and recent positive reviews suit ambitious hotels aiming for operational excellence.
Mews offers a modern, feature-rich platform supported by a large, active user base and recent reviews. Its cloud-native design supports automation, integrations, and scalability—crucial for hotels wanting to grow efficiently.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs advanced tools, international support, and a system that evolves with hospitality technology. If your operation is tiny, local, and needs only basic management, AsyaSoft might suffice, though its lack of recent reviews signals caution.
For most growing or modern hotels, Mews stands out as the more reliable, scalable, and feature-packed choice. It’s the platform designed to meet the demands of today’s hospitality industry—and tomorrow’s.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, AsyaSoft PMS y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. AsyaSoft PMS y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. AsyaSoft PMS ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
AsyaSoft PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. AsyaSoft tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos