The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Athena destaca .
HOTELTIME destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Tras analizar 549 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Athena valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de HOTELTIME destacan user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #5 219 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 238 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 46 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #8 7 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #3 241 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #4 143 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | — | #52 4 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #5 111 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #1 21 reseñas |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Athena by Athena and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME are two options that aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ greatly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on which product aligns better with your property's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Athena offers an AI-driven revenue management approach but lacks recent reviews and active user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current performance. HotelTime PMS, with over 430 recent reviews and a 4.83/5 overall rating, provides a clearer picture of its effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Do you prioritize proven, widely adopted solutions or an emerging platform with innovative features?
Athena aims to provide an all-in-one AI-powered revenue management tool that automates complex pricing strategies and optimizes profitability. HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, addresses a broad scope of hotel operations with a comprehensive set of features, including reservations, billing, and integrations.
While Athena focuses primarily on revenue optimization through advanced algorithms, its lack of recent reviews and engagement suggests it may not be the best choice for hotels seeking immediate, proven results. Conversely, HotelTime’s recent reviews reveal strong user satisfaction for operational management, customer support, and extensive integrations. Could your hotel benefit more from a system with tangible, well-documented performance?
If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich platform capable of handling complex operations and integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. It suits properties of all sizes, from boutique hotels to resorts, and boasts over 430 recent reviews—indicating a mature, well-supported product.
If your team is looking for an AI-driven revenue management tool with innovative automation, Athena might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s difficult to verify real-world effectiveness. For most hoteliers, a proven, highly-rated solution like HotelTime PMS offers more immediate, reliable value.
HotelTime PMS’s user interface scores 4.66/5, and reviewers frequently praise its intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Support staff are highly responsive, with a 4.73/5 rating, and many users appreciate the detailed onboarding process that helps staff adapt quickly.
Athena, with a 0/5 ease-of-use score, offers no recent user feedback, but its focus on AI suggests a potentially steep learning curve and a lack of proven onboarding success. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS offers 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, POS, guest CRM, mobile check-in, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Athena, however, has no listed features or integrations, focusing solely on AI-based revenue optimization.
Given the breadth of features and integrations, HotelTime PMS provides a more comprehensive operational toolkit. Athena’s niche focus on AI revenue management might be valuable for large, revenue-driven properties but lacks the versatility needed for day-to-day management. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support is consistently rated 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, thorough onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Customers appreciate the support team’s responsiveness, often describing them as knowledgeable and helpful.
In contrast, Athena has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its current customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, HotelTime’s proven track record gives it a definitive edge. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS connects with 58 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and third-party applications like Profitroom and STR. It offers extensive integration options, facilitating seamless data exchange across hotel functions.
Athena, with zero verified partners, provides no information on integrations, limiting its appeal for hotels requiring a flexible, interconnected tech stack. For scalability and operational flexibility, HotelTime PMS is the clear winner. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS enjoys a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 recent reviews, with properties across segments like resorts, boutique hotels, and city-center hotels expressing high satisfaction. Smaller and larger properties alike praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Athena, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, cannot be rated. Given the substantial recent reviews and high scores, HotelTime PMS has proven its value among a wide range of properties. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS charges $600 per month with no setup fees or trials available. Athena does not list pricing details, making cost comparisons impossible.
The transparent pricing of HotelTime provides clarity for budgeting, while Athena’s undisclosed costs leave potential buyers uncertain about value and affordability.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that HotelTime PMS is an established, fully-featured platform trusted by over 650 properties across multiple countries, with a strong track record of support and integrations. Athena, while promising as an AI revenue management tool, currently lacks recent user feedback and proven operational capabilities.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS with extensive features and integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its recent 4.83/5 rating and nearly 430 reviews underscore its ability to meet diverse hotel needs effectively.
For properties focused solely on innovative revenue optimization and willing to take a chance on a less proven platform, Athena might appeal. But for most hoteliers, the proven track record of HotelTime PMS outweighs Athena’s AI promise at this stage.
In summary, go with HotelTime PMS if you want a trusted, all-in-one solution that’s actively evolving and well-supported. Consider Athena only if your operation is highly sophisticated, revenue-centric, and you’re prepared for a less tested platform.
This comparison is based on the latest available review data, product features, and market presence as of October 2023.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Athena |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Athena y HotelTime PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Epopeya | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares | ||
| Vista de calendario |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 39 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Athena y HotelTime PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Athena ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que HotelTime PMS ofrece 58. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Athena: No. HotelTime PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Athena tiene un HT Score de 0 y HOTELTIME tiene 92. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos