The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Campgest destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Campgest valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| Campgest |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Campgest by Campgest and Mews PMS aim to streamline hospitality tasks, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Your choice hinges on whether you need an all-in-one system tailored for outdoor hospitality or a scalable, feature-rich platform designed for modern hotels.
Are you prioritizing a proven, comprehensive PMS with extensive integrations and a large user base, or are you exploring a niche solution that might still be evolving? Let’s compare these two options to see which better suits your property.
Campgest is a niche-oriented platform designed specifically for campground, RV park, and outdoor hospitality management. It promises automation for reservations, payments, and customer communication within a user-friendly interface, but it lacks a broad market presence and extensive integrations. Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-based hotel PMS with nearly 760 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, emphasizing automation, scalability, and a comprehensive ecosystem.
The key difference: Campgest scores a 0 in reviews and ratings, indicating no recent or substantial user feedback, while Mews boasts a high customer support rating, recent positive reviews, and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Do you want a system with proven, recent user satisfaction or one still seeking validation?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with robust integrations and extensive automation, go with Mews. It’s ideal for hotels seeking a system that supports growth, offers over 336 verified integrations, and has a proven track record with diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and large chains.
If your focus is solely on outdoor or campground management with simple reservation needs, Campgest might seem appealing. However, given its lack of recent reviews and features, Mews’s proven capabilities make it the safer, more future-proof choice for most hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s user interface receives a 4.7/5 rating based on 758 reviews, with hotel staff describing it as "modern, intuitive, and straightforward," and onboarding rated at 4.39/5. Users highlight that staff can log in remotely, with many praising the platform’s ease of adoption and quick setup.
Campgest’s usability score is 0, and there are no recent reviews to assess. Its lack of feedback suggests either minimal adoption or no active users, making it impossible to determine ease of use confidently.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, automation tools, mobile app, real-time reporting, and extensive payment capabilities. Many features are designed to support dynamic hotel operations, scalability, and guest engagement, which Campgest does not claim to offer or support.
Campgest has zero proprietary features listed, indicating a minimal or undeveloped feature set. Without a comprehensive feature suite, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a modern hotel.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support ratings are 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Many users have commented that the support team's quick problem resolution and dedicated onboarding helped them adapt swiftly, even amid occasional bugs.
Campgest’s ratings are unavailable, and reviews are lacking, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given Mews’s established reputation and recent feedback, it’s clearly the more reliable support choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment processors, and revenue tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its vast ecosystem allows hotels to customize their tech stack extensively.
Campgest has no verified integrations listed, suggesting a limited or non-existent partner network. For a property looking to connect with third-party tools and future-proof its operations, Mews’s ecosystem is far superior.
Edge: Mews.
With 758 recent reviews, Mews hosts a high rating of 4.62/5, praised across segments like boutique hotels, city-center properties, and chains. Hoteliers consistently highlight its ease of use, automation, and scalability, with many saying, "Mews makes everything much easier."
Campgest, with zero reviews, cannot be rated. Its lack of feedback indicates uncertainty or a very limited user base, which leaves Mews as the clearly favored choice.
Edge: Mews.
Campgest’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating it might operate on a custom or undisclosed pricing model, or it may not have an active paid offering. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or trial information available.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and widespread adoption, it provides predictable costs aligned with its feature-rich platform, unlike Campgest, which offers no clear financials.
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to scale or needs advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, or sophisticated guest engagement tools.
Not ideal if your hotel only needs very basic reservation management or operates outside the typical hospitality sector, such as outdoor venues.
Mews is a full-featured, scalable PMS backed by a large user base and recent positive reviews. It features 59 tools that support modern hotel operations, from automation and integrations to guest communications and real-time reporting.
If your hotel requires a proven, adaptable, and feature-rich platform, Mews is the clear winner. It’s especially advantageous for properties looking to grow, innovate, and connect with a broad ecosystem.
Campgest, by contrast, appears limited to outdoor hospitality and lacks recent feedback or a broad feature set, making it unsuitable for most traditional hotels seeking operational excellence.
Choose Mews if you want a trusted, modern platform with extensive support and proven success. Opt for Campgest only if your specific needs are confined to outdoor hospitality and simplicity, with no plans for expansion or integration.
In conclusion, the better PMS for your hotel depends on your growth ambitions, operational complexity, and technology needs. Mews’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features position it as the more reliable and comprehensive choice for most modern hotels.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Campgest |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Campgest y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Campgest y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Campgest ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Campgest: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Campgest tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos