The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Ciaobooking destaca .
HOTELTIME destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Tras analizar 549 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Ciaobooking valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de HOTELTIME destacan user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #5 219 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 238 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 46 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #8 7 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #3 241 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #4 143 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | — | #52 4 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #5 111 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #1 21 reseñas |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency and guest experience. You are weighing Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME—two platforms designed to streamline operations but differing significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which solution aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Remember, with more recent reviews and a larger user base, HotelTime PMS provides a more reliable snapshot of current performance. Which product truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Both Ciaobooking and HotelTime aim to automate hotel management, but they diverge sharply in execution and maturity. Ciaobooking, with zero reviews and no recent data, offers no detailed insights into its real-world performance or customer satisfaction levels. Meanwhile, HotelTime boasts 433 reviews, with 27 recent ones in the past six months, providing a clearer picture of ongoing support, usability, and feature reliability.
HotelTime’s high ratings—4.83 out of 5 overall and a 9.26/5 NPS score—indicate strong user satisfaction and consistent support. Conversely, Ciaobooking’s lack of reviews and scores suggests it’s either very new or not widely adopted, making it difficult to assess its suitability.
Are you comfortable choosing a product without recent user feedback, or do you prefer a solution with proven performance?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich platform capable of supporting complex operations and scaling across multiple properties, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its extensive capabilities—over 51 unique features like integrated CRS, guest CRM, payment processing, and housekeeper modules—are proven across thousands of properties worldwide. It caters well to mid-sized and large hotels seeking robust automation and integrations.
Ciaobooking, with no available features or user reviews, might suit very small or niche operations willing to accept a less proven solution. If your focus is on foundational reservation management without advanced features, Ciaobooking could suffice, but the risk remains high given the lack of data.
For most hotels seeking stability, proven support, and a broad feature set, HotelTime is the definitive recommendation.
HotelTime’s user experience scores—4.66/5 for ease of use and 4.73/5 for support—highlight its intuitive interface and positive onboarding feedback. Review quotes praise its simple, clear management reporting and seamless reservation handling, which allows staff to learn quickly and perform efficiently.
Ciaobooking, on the other hand, has no available usability data or reviews. The lack of user feedback makes it impossible to assess its interface, onboarding process, or staff adoption effectiveness.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 verified features, including integrated POS, guest profiles, automated night audit, revenue management, and online check-in—covering most operational needs. Its comprehensive suite supports multi-lingual, multi-currency transactions, automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems like channel managers, payment terminals, and CRM tools.
Ciaobooking has no listed features or integrations, indicating limited or undeclared functionality. This makes HotelTime the obvious leader for feature depth and versatility.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews consistently highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team, with an average rating of 4.73/5. Comments mention helpful onboarding, continuous updates, and a proactive approach to customer needs, making it easier for hotels to maximize system potential.
Ciaobooking offers no review data or customer feedback, so support quality remains unknown. Without recent user experiences, HotelTime’s support reputation strongly favors it.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and third-party systems essential for streamlined operations. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but HotelTime’s extensive partner network supports comprehensive hotel tech stacks.
Ciaobooking has no verified integrations or partner data, suggesting limited connectivity or that integrations are not a focus. For hotels needing a connected ecosystem, HotelTime’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews—4.83/5 rating from 433 reviews—reflect a broad, recent positive sentiment across diverse property types. Hotels ranging from boutique city hotels to resorts and chains praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Ciaobooking lacks reviews altogether, meaning no peer feedback exists to gauge user satisfaction. Given the recent and plentiful HotelTime reviews, its higher rating is a clear indicator of reliability and user approval.
Edge: HotelTime.
Ciaobooking’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving questions about affordability and value. Conversely, HotelTime charges a base fee of $600, with no mention of additional implementation or recurring costs, indicating a straightforward pricing model.
While HotelTime’s cost may be higher upfront, its extensive features and proven support justify the investment for most hotels. Ciaobooking’s lack of transparency makes it a risky choice from a value perspective.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations, strong support, and a large, recent review base. Its comprehensive tools support hotels in automating and streamlining operations across departments, making it suitable for properties of all sizes.
Ciaobooking, with no recent reviews or detailed features, appears to be an untested or emerging solution. If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and robust support, HotelTime is the safer, more reliable choice.
For hotels seeking a mature, well-supported PMS capable of supporting growth and complexity, HotelTime is the clear winner. Conversely, if your operation is minimal, budget-constrained, or experimental, Ciaobooking might be worth a cautious look—though the risks are significant.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Ciaobooking y HotelTime PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Epopeya | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares | ||
| Vista de calendario |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 39 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Ciaobooking y HotelTime PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Ciaobooking ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que HotelTime PMS ofrece 58. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Ciaobooking: No. HotelTime PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Ciaobooking tiene un HT Score de 0 y HOTELTIME tiene 92. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos