The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) destaca .
HOTELTIME destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Tras analizar 549 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de HOTELTIME destacan user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #5 219 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 238 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 46 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #8 7 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #3 241 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #4 143 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | — | #52 4 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #5 111 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #1 21 reseñas |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical step in streamlining hotel operations and improving guest experiences. You’re evaluating CMS Hospitality’s GuestCentrix and HotelTime PMS, both designed to automate and organize hotel workflows, but they diverge significantly in features, customer feedback, and regional presence. While GuestCentrix offers a legacy solution with enterprise-level capabilities, HotelTime is a modern, cloud-based platform with a rapidly growing user base and recent positive reviews.
Can your hotel afford to overlook the latest user feedback? Are you prepared to invest in a system that’s proven in diverse markets and with a broad feature set?
GuestCentrix by CMS Hospitality has been on the market for over 30 years, emphasizing stable, enterprise-grade solutions for multi-property operators, ski resorts, and national chains. It boasts a broad suite of features, including trust accounting, central reservations, and conference management, aimed at larger hotels or groups seeking comprehensive control.
In contrast, HotelTime offers a cloud-based, all-in-one platform with over 650 properties in more than 20 countries, focusing on ease of use and rapid deployment. Its extensive feature list includes POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and integrated channel management, making it suitable for a variety of property types, from resorts to boutique hotels.
GuestCentrix’s review count is zero, and its rating is unavailable, indicating limited recent feedback or active users. HotelTime, with 433 reviews and a 4.83/5 rating—including a 93% likelihood to recommend—demonstrates clear customer satisfaction. Given the latest reviews, HotelTime’s user confidence is stronger and more current.
Are you comfortable choosing a system with no recent reviews? Or do recent, verified user experiences influence your decision more?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based platform that offers extensive automation, real-time reporting, and strong user support, HotelTime is the clear choice. It’s ideal for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and modular features—especially with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and responsive support.
However, if your hotel operates multiple properties, requires advanced enterprise features like trust accounting, conference management, or complex integrations, GuestCentrix’s longer industry presence and proprietary nature might appeal. But be aware—its lack of recent reviews suggests limited current support or user engagement.
Given the review data, HotelTime’s recent positive feedback and extensive feature set make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. GuestCentrix’s reputation appears outdated or under-supported in the current market.
HotelTime’s interface scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Users appreciate the smooth onboarding process, with an average rating of 4.63/5, and highlight how staff adapt quickly to its features.
GuestCentrix’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews or feedback, making it impossible to assess its current user-friendliness. Historically, enterprise systems like GuestCentrix tend to have steeper learning curves and longer onboarding times, which could hinder staff adoption today.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online booking engine, automated night audit, mobile app, and comprehensive revenue management tools. Its extensive integration options support third-party systems like Sage, Profitroom, and STR, giving you flexibility.
GuestCentrix provides no specific feature count but offers core PMS functions like reservations and trust accounting, targeted at larger operations. Its lack of recent feature innovation, combined with no recent customer reviews, suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hotel technology needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support ratings are high, with an average of 4.73/5, and reviews mentioning quick, responsive assistance. Customers say support “went above and beyond,” especially during onboarding and system troubleshooting, contributing to a 9.26/5 NPS score.
GuestCentrix’s support rating is unreported, and with no recent reviews, there’s little current data on support quality. Historically, CMS Hospitality emphasizes support but may not match HotelTime’s recent customer feedback levels.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like STAAH, SiteMinder, and Cendyn, with seven shared integrations with GuestCentrix. Its open API architecture allows seamless connection to revenue management, POS, and CRM systems.
GuestCentrix has just 12 verified partners, with integrations limited mainly to traditional enterprise systems like Sage and Infor. Its smaller partner network could restrict flexibility for hotels seeking comprehensive third-party connectivity.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support responsiveness, and operational improvements. Properties across various segments, especially resorts and city hotels, report high satisfaction levels.
GuestCentrix has no recent reviews, leaving potential users without recent data on hotel satisfaction. Its historical reputation was stable, but current performance remains unverified.
Edge: HotelTime.
GuestCentrix does not publicly list pricing; it typically offers bespoke quotes based on property size and needs. This makes direct comparison difficult, but it suggests a premium enterprise-level pricing model.
HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no free tier or trial, indicating an accessible price point for many hotels seeking a feature-rich PMS without large upfront investments.
In terms of transparency and value, HotelTime’s straightforward pricing allows easier budgeting and decision-making.
Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The essential difference is that HotelTime is a modern, cloud-based PMS with a rapidly growing user base and high recent ratings, while GuestCentrix offers an older, enterprise-focused platform with no recent reviews.
If your hotel values ease of use, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations, HotelTime should be your top choice. It’s especially suited for properties seeking a scalable solution with proven customer satisfaction.
GuestCentrix might be suitable for very large, multi-property operations with complex enterprise requirements, but its lack of current reviews and recent activity suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hotel tech landscapes.
For most hotels today, HotelTime offers a more reliable, user-friendly, and well-supported option.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) y HotelTime PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Epopeya | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares | ||
| Vista de calendario |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 39 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) y HotelTime PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) ofrece 12 socios de integración verificados, mientras que HotelTime PMS ofrece 58. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix): No. HotelTime PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) tiene un HT Score de 0 y HOTELTIME tiene 92. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos