The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 57 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Counter destaca en ease of use and customer support , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Hogatex destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 57 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 57 | 0 |
Tras analizar 57 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Counter valoran más su interfaz de usuario y usabilidad, atención al cliente, funciones automatizadas, mientras que los usuarios de Hogatex destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Interfaz de usuario y usabilidad
▾
|
|
|
+
Atención al cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Funciones automatizadas
▾
|
|
|
+
Integración de plataformas
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Problemas de errores
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y gestión de ingresos
▾
|
|
|
−
Precios
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #26 28 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) | #46 4 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) | #32 2 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) | #31 1 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reseñas | — |
| Lujo | #44 4 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca | #43 4 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #32 5 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #25 8 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #20 25 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico | #16 4 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente | #11 2 reseñas | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hogatex PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more extensive feature set make it the more complete solution. Hogatex, with no current reviews or ratings, offers a broader but less proven platform. Which system will truly elevate your hotel’s operations?
Counter’s comprehensive, user-rated platform offers a proven track record, whereas Hogatex remains untested in recent deployments. Are you prioritizing reliability and community feedback or exploring new options?
Counter excels in supporting hostel operations with an intuitive interface, automation features, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for budget accommodations and hostels. Hogatex claims to be a full-scale PMS but has no recent reviews or user feedback to verify its effectiveness.
Counter’s 54 reviews over the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong user confidence, especially in ease of use and support. Hogatex’s absence of recent reviews suggests it’s either less adopted or less active in customer engagement, raising questions about ongoing support and reliability.
Counter’s interface is rated 4.6/5 and customer support 4.96/5, praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. Hogatex’s lack of publicly available ratings means you have no recent data on user satisfaction, support quality, or ease of onboarding.
Counter features 19 distinct functionalities, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and automated night audits. Hogatex’s feature set remains undefined, with no publicly listed capabilities, making Counter’s offering the more transparent and proven choice.
Support-wise, Counter’s support team is highly rated, with users highlighting quick, helpful assistance from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hogatex’s support details and customer feedback are unavailable, indicating uncertainty in service quality.
Counter’s integrations include seven verified partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds—covering key channels and payment solutions. Hogatex has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options for now.
Hoteliers rate Counter highly across segments, especially in hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hogatex’s lack of reviews prevents any assessment of user satisfaction, making Counter the safer bet for assured positive feedback.
Pricing details for Counter are unavailable, but its no-cost model for core features, plus optional paid integrations, suggests flexibility. Hogatex’s pricing remains undisclosed, which complicates direct cost comparisons.
Counter is ideal for hostels, boutique hotels, city-center properties, and independent inns—particularly those needing a straightforward, feature-rich system that supports mobile management. Not recommended if your property requires extensive automation or a broader property type beyond hostels.
Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger or needs a full PMS, but the absence of reviews makes this uncertain. It’s not ideal if you prioritize proven customer support, recent user feedback, or robust integrations.
Counter vs Hogatex: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Counter’s large, recent review base and high ratings confirm its reliability and effectiveness in hostel management and small hotel operations. Hogatex, with no recent reviews or community feedback, remains an untested option in today’s market.
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use PMS with built-in automation, integrations, and strong support, go with Counter. Its extensive features and positive user feedback make it a dependable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.
Choose Hogatex if you are exploring new vendors and are willing to accept the risk of limited real-world validation. Its lack of recent reviews and unknown support quality make it a less certain investment.
In conclusion, Counter clearly stands out as the more dependable, reviewed, and feature-rich choice, especially for hostels and small hotels. Hogatex’s potential is unverified, and without recent customer insights, it’s harder to recommend confidently.
Counter by Counter offers a feature-rich, user-rated platform with recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hostels and small hotels looking for proven operational tools. Hogatex PMS, with no recent feedback or ratings, remains an untested option that lacks demonstrated support and integrations.
Counter’s strong community feedback, multiple integrations, and ease of use make it the top choice. Hogatex’s lack of recent customer reviews and unknown capabilities place it at a disadvantage for hoteliers seeking reliable, current solutions.
Counter’s intuitive interface simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and reporting, helping your team manage operations efficiently with minimal training. Its automation features—like automatic night audits and integrated POS—reduce manual work, freeing staff to focus on guest interactions.
Hogatex claims to streamline reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but provides no recent user feedback to confirm these efficiencies. Without current reviews, it’s unclear if Hogatex reduces workload or improves guest satisfaction like Counter does.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design ensures your team can manage the property from anywhere, offering flexibility that’s especially valuable for small or busy hotels. Hogatex’s platform lacks publicly available usability data, making it uncertain whether it can deliver similar operational gains.
Support at Counter is highly rated, with quick responses and proactive problem-solving. Hogatex provides no recent support reviews, so your team might face challenges in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Counter’s integrations with key partners like SiteMinder and Stripe facilitate daily operations by consolidating bookings and payments. Hogatex’s integrations are nonexistent in available data, limiting its immediate usefulness for integrated workflows.
Overall, if your staff values ease of use, automation, and reliable support, Counter will likely improve your daily operations. Hogatex’s untested platform leaves its impact on daily management uncertain.
Counter’s support team scores 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their quick, friendly assistance. Testimonials highlight staff like Evelyn and Max as go-to contacts who resolve issues promptly, boosting team confidence.
Hogatex offers no recent review data on support quality. Without current feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether their support team is responsive or provides effective onboarding, making Counter the more dependable choice.
Counter’s onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, and its user interface is praised for being clean and intuitive. Hogatex’s onboarding process and usability remain unverified due to lack of recent reviews.
Support features like 24/7 online assistance and dedicated account help set Counter apart. Without recent Hogatex customer feedback, its support quality remains unknown, posing a potential risk for new users.
In terms of staff adoption, Counter’s straightforward interface and positive onboarding ratings lead to faster staff training and higher user satisfaction. Hogatex’s unreviewed support and usability leave its ease of adoption in question.
Edge: Counter
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features are well-documented, with many praised for their practicality and ease of use.
Hogatex’s feature set remains undisclosed, and no recent reviews or detailed descriptions are available. Without verified features, it’s impossible to compare comprehensively, but Counter’s transparent feature list makes it a safer, more predictable choice.
Counter’s integrated POS and revenue tracking modules support a broader range of operational needs. Hogatex, lacking public feature details, does not currently demonstrate the same level of functional depth.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s customer support is rated 4.96/5, with users consistently praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Positive reviews cite quick solutions to issues and proactive communication, especially during onboarding.
Hogatex offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality and responsiveness unverified. Without community feedback, your hotel risks uncertain assistance, which can be critical during system issues or training.
Counter’s support team is known for addressing bugs swiftly and providing ongoing assistance, which contributes to high user satisfaction. Hogatex’s lack of recent support reviews and data makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s service needs.
Support quality is crucial for smooth daily operations; with Counter’s proven record, your team will likely experience fewer disruptions. Hogatex’s support remains an unknown factor, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations allow for streamlined bookings, payments, and access control, making daily operations smoother.
Hogatex currently has no verified integrations publicly listed. This limits its connectivity to essential third-party tools, potentially requiring manual processes that counteract efficiency.
Counter’s open partner ecosystem helps expand your hotel’s market reach and operational flexibility. Hogatex’s limited connectivity reduces its appeal for properties relying on multiple channels or payment providers.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s user base, primarily hostels and small hotels, rates it at 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Hogatex lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Its absence from community feedback implies it’s less proven or less adopted in today’s hotel market.
Counter’s recent feedback confirms its strengths in usability, support, and feature set, especially for budget and hostel accommodations. Hogatex’s unverified reputation means it cannot be confidently recommended based on current user experiences.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but its free core features and optional paid services suggest a flexible, scalable approach for small to medium-sized properties.
Hogatex does not list any pricing information, leaving hoteliers to guess about costs or negotiate directly. The absence of transparent pricing may complicate budgeting decisions.
Counter’s lack of upfront costs and modular pricing make it suitable for properties seeking predictable investments. Hogatex’s undisclosed fees mean you should be cautious about potential hidden costs or lack of affordability.
Counter is best for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation without complex customization needs. It’s not suited for larger, enterprise-level hotels seeking highly tailored systems.
Hogatex might fit larger-scale operations, but the current lack of community feedback makes it a risky choice for hoteliers requiring proven support and functionality.
Counter’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven track record make it the more reliable choice for small hotels and hostels. Its broad feature set, integrations, and support infrastructure directly address the needs of properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Hogatex, without recent reviews or community feedback, remains an unverified contender. Its unknown support quality and features make it a risky option, especially when reliable service and proven results are critical.
If you need a trustworthy, well-supported platform with proven results, Counter is the clear winner. Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger, but it’s advisable to wait for more validation before choosing it.
Counter’s community-backed success and recent positive reviews give you confidence that it will meet your property’s operational needs. Its strong ecosystem of integrations and support makes it the safer, more strategic investment for your team.
Hogatex remains an unconfirmed candidate, with no recent user feedback to validate its claims. For now, Counter’s proven track record and high satisfaction scores make it the preferred option for hoteliers looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest experiences.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision toward a system that’s not only feature-rich but also trusted by your peers. Prioritize proven support, community reviews, and real-world functionality — Counter currently leads in all these areas.
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Counter y Hogatex PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Gerente de Canal | ||
| Informes RevPaR y ADR | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Tarifas personalizadas | ||
| Vista de calendario |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 7 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Los hoteleros consideran que la interfaz de Counter es clara, intuitiva y fácil de usar, lo que facilita la capacitación rápida del nuevo personal. La... Los hoteleros consideran que la interfaz de Counter es clara, intuitiva y fácil de usar, lo que facilita la capacitación rápida del nuevo personal. Las interfaces para dispositivos móviles y de escritorio funcionan bien, permitiendo a los gerentes gestionar tareas de forma remota. Destaca especialmente por su simplicidad en la gestión del calendario.
El equipo de soporte de Counter recibe elogios frecuentes por su capacidad de respuesta y amabilidad. Personal como Evelyn y Max reciben menciones esp... El equipo de soporte de Counter recibe elogios frecuentes por su capacidad de respuesta y amabilidad. Personal como Evelyn y Max reciben menciones especiales por su profesionalismo. Sin embargo, existe la preocupación de que el soporte sea más lento en ciertas zonas horarias.
Los usuarios valoran las funciones automatizadas de Counter, que incluyen tareas como el check-in sin contacto, la automatización de cargos a tarjetas... Los usuarios valoran las funciones automatizadas de Counter, que incluyen tareas como el check-in sin contacto, la automatización de cargos a tarjetas de crédito y la gestión de reservas en diferentes plataformas. Esta automatización reduce la carga de trabajo del personal y mejora la eficiencia operativa.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Varios hoteleros mencionan errores persistentes en el sistema, en particular problemas con sobreventas, visualización de la disponibilidad de camas y... Varios hoteleros mencionan errores persistentes en el sistema, en particular problemas con sobreventas, visualización de la disponibilidad de camas y errores del sistema durante las cancelaciones de reservas. Estos errores tienen un impacto negativo en las operaciones diarias y la experiencia del huésped.
Los hoteleros valoran las funciones de generación de informes de Counter, pero señalan que estos pueden mejorarse para obtener una mejor perspectiva.... Los hoteleros valoran las funciones de generación de informes de Counter, pero señalan que estos pueden mejorarse para obtener una mejor perspectiva. Las funciones de gestión de ingresos se consideran deficientes, especialmente para empresas que operan con múltiples planes de tarifas o utilizan precios dinámicos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Counter y Hogatex PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Counter ofrece 7 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Hogatex PMS ofrece 0. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Counter lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Counter: No. Hogatex PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Counter tiene un HT Score de 17 y Hogatex tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos