Counter vs. Tesipro:
¿Cuál es el adecuado para ti?

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Tesipro by Tesipro hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter focuses on simplicity and ease of use for hostels, while Tesipro offers a broader suite of features suited for larger, more complex properties.

Counter excels in its user-friendly design, quick onboarding, and strong support, making it an ideal choice for small to mid-sized hostels. Tesipro, on the other hand, provides extensive features for full-service hotels and chains, but its lack of recent reviews and lower ratings make it a less reliable option right now.

Is Counter or Tesipro Better for Hotels?

Counter’s core advantage is its dedicated focus on hostels, with a straightforward interface that staff can learn fast. Tesipro aims at larger establishments needing extensive integrations and modules, but it has zero recent reviews, raising questions about its current performance and user experience.

Counter is built around ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating for usability and over 50 reviews, most recent from the last six months, indicating current active users. Tesipro’s absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it keeps pace with modern hotel management needs, but its feature set suggests a focus on larger operations.

The key difference lies in their target audiences: Counter is designed for small, independent properties like hostels, while Tesipro caters to bigger hotels and chains. Would your team benefit most from a simple, reliable PMS or a comprehensive, scalable platform? That’s the core of their divergence.

Counter vs Tesipro: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a hostel or small property that prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and responsive customer support, Counter is your better choice. It’s especially beneficial if your team needs to manage check-ins, bookings, and payments from mobile devices on the go, supported by a 4.96/5 support rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend.

Conversely, if your property is a large hotel or chain with complex operations requiring advanced modules like EPoS, integrated CRS, shift planning, and real-time reporting, Tesipro’s extensive feature list makes it appealing. But without recent reviews, you should consider whether the platform’s current performance matches its feature promise.

For hoteliers focused on hostels or small independent hotels seeking simplicity, Counter’s reputation and recent user feedback clearly favor it. Larger properties with the need for extensive integrations and modules might lean toward Tesipro, but caution is advised given the lack of recent feedback.

Is Counter or Tesipro Easier to Use?

Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Hoteliers emphasize how fast staff can be trained and how seamlessly the system integrates into daily operations, with support from responsive team members like Evelyn and Max.

Tesipro’s usability data is unavailable, and its lack of recent reviews leaves its ease of use uncertain. Larger, complex systems often come with steeper learning curves, and without current feedback, it’s hard to gauge whether Tesipro has addressed usability issues.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter offers 16 shared features with Tesipro, plus three exclusive modules: guest CRM, guest profiles, and ancillary revenue tracking. Tesipro’s 28 unique features include specialized modules like Spa & Wellness, EPoS, task management, digital registration, and real-time status updates—ideal for full-service hotels.

Counter’s features are more basic, fitting small properties that need core functionalities. Tesipro’s extensive modules support larger, complex operations but may be excessive for smaller properties. Ultimately, if you need a broad feature set, Tesipro wins; if simplicity suffices, Counter is better.

Edge: Tesipro.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Specific mentions include quick replies from team members like Evelyn and Max, reinforcing confidence in their service.

Tesipro’s support reputation and recent reviews are absent, making it difficult to compare support quality. For hotel operators relying on reliable support, Counter’s current high ratings are a decisive advantage.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter connects with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and WuBook. Tesipro’s 25 verified partners include major industry players such as Cendyn, RateGain, and Nonius, offering broader connectivity.

While Tesipro’s extensive integrations may appeal to larger properties needing multiple system linkages, Counter’s strategic integrations are sufficient for small to mid-sized hostels, offering streamlined operations. For your needs, the breadth of integrations in Tesipro might be overkill unless you operate at a larger scale.

Edge: Tesipro.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter’s recent reviews (54 reviews, last six months) reflect an average rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Hoteliers in the hostel segment highlight its ease of use, quick support, and reliability.

Tesipro has no recent reviews or ratings, so we cannot determine current user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Counter, it clearly holds the higher rating among current users.

Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Tesipro Cost?

Counter does not publicly disclose a pricing model, but it is known to be a free, no-implementation-fee PMS tailored for hostels. Tesipro’s base price starts at $1,300, but there’s no mention of ongoing monthly fees or customizable options.

Counter’s free model makes it accessible for small properties, whereas Tesipro’s cost may be justifiable for larger operations needing its extensive modules. However, the lack of current pricing details for Tesipro warrants caution.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

• Hotels that operate as hostels or small independent properties with simple management needs.
• Teams seeking a mobile-friendly, easy-to-learn platform to manage guest bookings and check-ins.
• Facilities prioritizing quick onboarding with minimal training time.
• Businesses that need automated payment processing and integrations with POS systems.
• Hotels that operate in regions where a free, reliable PMS is advantageous.

Not ideal if your property requires multiple complex modules like spa management, detailed revenue analysis, or extensive integrations with large OTAs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Tesipro?

• Larger hotels and hotel groups with complex operational requirements.
• Properties needing extensive modules such as EPoS, shift planning, real-time reporting, and integrated CRS.
• Teams that want to centralize multiple functions like guest management, task management, and digital registration.
• Hotels operating in markets where a broad ecosystem of integrations and advanced features are necessary.
• Properties with resources to implement and maintain a more sophisticated PMS.

Not ideal if your property is small, independent, or prioritizes a simple, cost-effective management solution.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter’s core strength lies in its simplicity, active user base, and recent high ratings. It’s perfect for hostels and small properties that need an intuitive, reliable PMS without the complexity or cost of larger systems.

Tesipro offers a broad array of features but suffers from a lack of recent user feedback, making its current performance uncertain. It’s suited for large, complex hotels and chains that can benefit from its extensive modules, assuming its platform remains as robust as advertised.

If your property’s operational focus is on ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Counter is the clear choice. For full-scale hotel management with advanced features, Tesipro could be suitable—if it delivers on its promises today.

In conclusion, given the current data, Counter is the stronger option due to its active user reviews, higher ratings, and proven support. Consider Tesipro only if your hotel has the resources to explore its extensive capabilities and can verify ongoing platform stability.

Note: This analysis is based on available reviews, feature comparisons, and product descriptions as of October 2023. Always verify with the vendor for up-to-date details.