The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
GRAND destaca , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Messaging.
HOTELTIME destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 549 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Tras analizar 549 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de GRAND valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de HOTELTIME destacan user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #5 219 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 238 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #2 46 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #8 7 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #3 241 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #4 143 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | — | #52 4 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #5 111 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #1 21 reseñas |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to streamline management tasks, improve guest experiences, and centralize operations, but they diverge sharply in features, user feedback, and market presence. With HOTELTIME boasting a significantly higher review count and more recent reviews, it clearly holds a stronger position in the current market. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
GRAND PMS and HotelTime PMS are both cloud-based property management systems designed to improve hotel operations. GRAND offers a single, intuitive platform that unifies bookings, housekeeping, billing, and reporting, with additional tools for event management and proposals. HotelTime, meanwhile, provides a broad suite of features, including reservations, spa and restaurant management, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes. While GRAND’s interface emphasizes automation and simplicity, HotelTime’s strength lies in its extensive, feature-rich environment.
However, the critical difference is in their market credibility: HOTELTIME has over 430 reviews, with most recent feedback from the last six months, giving it a more current and comprehensive understanding of user experiences. GRAND’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Would you prefer a platform with proven market validation or a newer system with limited feedback?
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-dense platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple departments and locations, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, city hotels, and large groups, thanks to its extensive integrations and modules like POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and automation tools.
On the other hand, if your team prioritizes a straightforward, AI-powered interface that simplifies daily tasks and reduces manual work, GRAND could appeal — although the absence of user feedback makes this less certain. Hotels looking for proven reliability and broad functionality should lean toward HotelTime, especially given its larger, more recent review base.
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive design, simple navigation, and quick onboarding. Support and onboarding ratings at 4.73 indicate your team will likely find it straightforward to adopt, with many users mentioning minimal training time and smooth implementation.
In contrast, GRAND’s review score for ease of use is 0, reflecting no data or user feedback. This lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess onboarding or user experience. Based on available data, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 38 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, mobile app, revenue management, and online check-in. Its broader feature set allows for comprehensive management of hotel and venue operations, reducing the need for multiple systems.
GRAND offers only one feature exclusive to its platform: guest messaging, with the remaining 13 shared features. Its limited feature count suggests a narrower scope, potentially less suitable for complex, multi-department hotels. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime consistently receives positive reviews about support, with a 4.73 out of 5 rating and comments like, “Support team is responsive and helpful,” and “Support staff are always on the other end of the phone.” Many users praise the onboarding process and continual assistance, which appears to enhance user confidence.
GRAND’s support ratings are at zero; no reviews or data are available to gauge support quality. Without recent customer feedback, the clear edge goes to HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, offering extensive customization options. Shared integrations are minimal, but the breadth of available partners supports robust hotel tech stacks.
GRAND has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other tools and systems. For hotels seeking a highly connected platform, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, with 433 reviews, indicates strong satisfaction across multiple hotel segments. Recent reviews praise its flexibility, customer support, and features, with property types like resorts and city hotels rating it near perfect.
GRAND, with no reviews, cannot be rated by users. The clear choice based on user ratings and recent feedback is HotelTime.
GRAND’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $900, with no mention of freemium options or monthly plans. Conversely, HotelTime’s base price starts at $600, with similar no-trial, no-implementation fees.
Given the lack of detailed pricing for GRAND, HotelTime presents a more transparent and competitive model for hotels of various sizes.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Not recommended without more feedback on GRAND’s real-world performance.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Hotels that need a proven, feature-packed platform with broad support.
The core difference is in market presence and user feedback: HotelTime’s large, recent review base confirms its reliability and customer satisfaction, while GRAND remains largely untested in the field. If your hotel values a feature-rich, well-supported system, HotelTime’s extensive modules and integrations make it the stronger choice.
Choose GRAND if your hotel values simplicity, AI automation, and guest messaging, and if you’re willing to accept less proven performance. However, for most hotels seeking a dependable, full-featured platform, HotelTime provides a safer, more validated solution.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s broad features, proven support, and extensive integrations make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence. GRAND’s potential is evident, but without more recent reviews, its suitability remains uncertain. We recommend HotelTime for hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive management tools today.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, GRAND PMS y HotelTime PMS comparten 13 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Epopeya | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares | ||
| Tarifas personalizadas |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 27 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Capacidades únicas
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. GRAND PMS y HotelTime PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. GRAND PMS ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que HotelTime PMS ofrece 58. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
GRAND PMS: No. HotelTime PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. GRAND tiene un HT Score de 0 y HOTELTIME tiene 92. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos