The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Isidoro destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Isidoro valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| Isidoro |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing between Isidoro by Isidoro and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both claim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, user base, and support vary significantly. Isidoro’s platform is virtually unreviewed and lacks recent data, while Mews boasts a strong track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews and a high user rating. Which system will truly serve your hotel today and scale with you tomorrow?
If your priority is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations and a track record of supporting diverse hotel types, Mews stands out. Conversely, Isidoro's minimal review data and absence of a recent user base make it difficult to assess its true performance or suitability.
Both Isidoro and Mews aim to simplify hotel operations, but their approaches diverge sharply. Isidoro offers no public feature list, no verified integrations, and no recent reviews, raising questions about its capabilities and support. Mews, on the other hand, provides over 59 unique features, more than 336 verified integrations, and hundreds of recent reviews that consistently praise its ease of use, support, and flexibility.
Mews’s recent reviews from nearly 100 hotels in the last six months, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, reinforce its relevance and reliability. Isidoro's lack of recent data and zero reviews make it impossible to determine its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Are you willing to take a chance on an unproven system, or do you prefer a solution with validated performance?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system with extensive third-party integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear choice. It caters well to boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties, offering modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting—features highly valued by hotels of various sizes.
If your hotel operates a single property with minimal complexity, and you're comfortable with an untested platform, Isidoro might seem appealing, but there's no recent data to confirm this. For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, guest experience, and long-term scalability, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic investment.
Mews is praised by users for its intuitive, modern interface, with a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 758 reviews, and a straightforward onboarding process scored similarly. Reviewers consistently highlight how quickly staff adopt Mews, citing its clean design and helpful training resources.
In contrast, Isidoro’s ease of use is not documented publicly, with no reviews or ratings available. The absence of user feedback makes it impossible to compare usability directly, but given Mews’s extensive positive reviews, it’s clear that Mews is the more user-friendly option. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, advanced booking engines, guest CRM, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and extensive integrations. These features enable a hotel to personalize the guest journey, automate operations, and connect to a broad tech ecosystem.
Isidoro’s feature set is not publicly available or verified, with no specific modules or functionalities listed. Without concrete information, it’s impossible to assess whether it offers comparable capabilities. Based on available data, Mews’s extensive feature set provides a decisive edge. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support has been rated 4.27/5 by users, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users often mention that support teams resolve issues swiftly, with some noting their proactive communication during onboarding.
Isidoro’s customer support is unreviewed and unverified, making it impossible to compare support quality confidently. Given Mews’s high support ratings and consistent recent praise, it’s clear that Mews provides more reliable, accessible support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, offering a comprehensive ecosystem. This enables hotels to tailor their tech stack for operations, revenue, and guest experience enhancements.
Isidoro reports no verified partners, raising concerns about its capability to connect with other hotel systems. Without proven integrations, Isidoro’s flexibility is questionable. Mews’s extensive ecosystem offers a significant practical advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 758 recent reviews, Mews maintains a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% recommendation rate from diverse properties including boutique hotels, hostels, resorts, and chains. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and extensive features, particularly for mid-sized and larger operations.
Isidoro’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The recent and plentiful positive feedback for Mews decisively favors it as the trusted, high-rated choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900/month with no free tier or trial, which might be a barrier for some small properties. Isidoro’s pricing is not publicly available, and with no recent reviews or user data, it’s unclear whether it offers a competitive or scalable pricing model.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers a clear financial benchmark. Without data supporting Isidoro’s cost-effectiveness, Mews’s price point, supported by extensive positive reviews, remains a more concrete indicator of value.
Not ideal if:
Edge: None (uncertain due to lack of data).
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Mews is a proven, feature-packed PMS supported by a large user community and extensive recent reviews. Its broad ecosystem, high support ratings, and documented success stories make it a reliable partner for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
Isidoro’s platform remains unreviewed and unverified, with no recent data to confirm its capabilities or support quality. For hotels serious about operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth, Mews’s established track record makes it the clear choice.
If you want a system with proven functionality, seamless integrations, and happy users, go with Mews.
If your hotel has minimal needs and is willing to take a risk on an untested platform, Isidoro might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews and extensive features position it as the smarter, safer investment for your hotel’s management system today.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Isidoro |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Isidoro y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Isidoro y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Isidoro ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Isidoro: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Isidoro tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos