The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
KrossBooking destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de KrossBooking valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing between KrossBooking and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to manage reservations and streamline operations but diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. While KrossBooking claims to be a comprehensive property management system, its lack of recent reviews and near-zero user feedback cast doubt on its effectiveness. Conversely, Mews boasts a robust, widely adopted platform with nearly 760 recent reviews, making it a more reliable choice.
Are you looking for a proven, well-supported platform with extensive integrations and a track record of innovation? Or are you exploring a newer, less tested solution that might still be under development? The decision should be based on data-backed confidence and existing user experiences.
KrossBooking positions itself as a comprehensive property management system but offers no recent reviews or verified ratings, signaling limited market adoption and unproven performance. Mews, on the other hand, has a 4.62/5 rating based on hundreds of recent reviews and an NPS of 9.12/5, reflecting high user satisfaction and ongoing innovation.
While KrossBooking aims to streamline reservation management, it lacks the extensive feature set and global presence that Mews provides. Mews’s cloud-native platform supports everything from automated check-in to integrated payments, backed by a thriving ecosystem of over 336 third-party integrations. Do you want a platform with proven scalability and a large support network? Or are you comfortable with a lesser-known system with unverified functionality?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven support and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its strong reputation across a broad range of hotel types—especially boutique, mid-sized, and chain properties—makes it ideal for growth-oriented teams.
If, however, your hotel is seeking a simple reservation system or a solution specifically tailored to a very niche operation without needing advanced automation or multi-property management, KrossBooking might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews and no clear pricing or feature details, it’s hard to justify over a platform with a track record of customer satisfaction like Mews.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training. Support from Mews is rated 4.27/5, with many reviews highlighting their rapid response and helpful onboarding process.
KrossBooking, by contrast, has a rating of 0/5 on the same scale, and no recent reviews are available. This stark absence of feedback suggests uncertainty about its user experience and support quality. Given Mews’s proven track record and high satisfaction, edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, integrated CRS, mobile apps, automated reports, and extensive payment options. These features empower hotels to operate efficiently and deliver a modern guest experience.
KrossBooking provides no verified features or detailed descriptions, making it impossible to compare directly. Its lack of advertised functionalities and no recent user feedback heavily favor Mews, which’s proven to support diverse hotel operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support is highly rated at 4.27/5, with reviews praising their quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Many users mention that Mews support helps smooth the implementation and day-to-day operation, reducing downtime.
KrossBooking, with zero reviews and ratings, offers no evidence of support quality or responsiveness. Without user feedback or a support reputation, Mews’s established support system clearly edges out. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including extensive partnerships with channel managers, revenue tools, and payment processors. Its open API and Mews Marketplace enable customization and scalability for growing hotels.
KrossBooking reports zero verified partners, limiting its integration potential and flexibility. For hotels seeking a connected, future-proof system, Mews’s ecosystem provides a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high ratings across hotel segments, with an average of 4.64/5 in some reviews and an overall 4.62/5 score. Larger and boutique hotels, as well as chains, praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
KrossBooking has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Given the recent, detailed positive feedback for Mews, it’s the clear choice. Edge: Mews.
KrossBooking’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a free trial or transparent pricing model. Mews charges a starting fee of $900 monthly, with no implementation costs and no mention of per-room charges.
The transparency and clarity of Mews's pricing, along with its proven value in operational efficiencies, make it the more predictable investment. Edge: Mews.
Given the lack of recent reviews and limited feature information, KrossBooking is suited for very small or highly niche operations looking for a straightforward reservation tool.
Mews’s broad functionality makes it well-suited for diverse property types, especially those aiming for innovation and operational efficiency.
Mews stands out as the more mature, feature-rich, and widely supported platform. Its high ratings, extensive integrations, and proven customer satisfaction make it the clear choice for hotels looking to modernize and scale.
KrossBooking, with no recent reviews or verified capabilities, remains a less proven option. It may serve very small or niche operators temporarily but lacks the ecosystem and confidence needed for long-term growth.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable, and well-supported PMS, choose Mews. If you’re exploring a very basic, untested system for a minimal operation, KrossBooking might be worth a cautious trial — but the risks are significant given the limited data.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| KrossBooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, KrossBooking y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | KrossBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. KrossBooking y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. KrossBooking ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
KrossBooking: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. KrossBooking tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos