The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
LMPM destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de LMPM valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| LMPM |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing between LMPM by LMPM and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and user feedback. Do you prioritize a system with a proven track record and extensive integrations, or a niche solution tailored for vacation rentals with automation focus?
LMPM is a largely unreviewed system, offering minimal data and no recent feedback to support its claims, whereas Mews boasts over 750 recent reviews with a near-perfect rating. Given this, which platform provides the confidence and features your hotel needs to thrive today?
LMPM appears to be a property management system designed for vacation rentals, promising automation and real-time insights. However, with zero recent reviews and no rating available, there’s no clear evidence of its performance or user satisfaction. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62 out of 5 rating based on 758 reviews, with nearly 100 in the last six months alone—indicating ongoing development and strong user confidence.
While LMPM may claim to simplify operations, the absence of user feedback raises questions about its reliability and feature completeness. Mews, on the other hand, is a recognized leader in the space, especially for hotels seeking a robust, cloud-based platform. Is a vendor with proven reviews and active user engagement the safer choice for your hotel’s future?
If your hotel needs a flexible, well-supported PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace and proven track record make it suitable for a range of property types, from boutique to large-scale operations. If you have very specific, niche needs for vacation rentals and prefer a system tailored solely for that segment, LMPM might seem appealing—though the lack of recent user feedback makes this a risky proposition.
For hotels prioritizing reliable support, continuous innovation, and proven scalability, Mews is the clear leader. LMPM’s limited data and unverified claims make it difficult to recommend confidently, especially when choosing a critical system that impacts daily operations and guest experiences.
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, based on more than 750 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Reviews for LMPM provide no recent data or ratings, leaving its usability unverified and potentially unreliable.
Given the overwhelming user feedback, Mews’ user interface is modern, straightforward, and adaptable to staff needs. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated reminders, task management, real-time reporting, and extensive payment options. LMPM, by contrast, lists no features or integrations, leaving its functional scope entirely unknown.
Mews’ feature depth and active development cycle provide hotels with tools to optimize operations and guest engagement. Without verified features, LMPM cannot compete. Edge: Mews.
Mews has a 4.27 out of 5 rating for customer support, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users note that support is generally prompt, with issues resolved swiftly, despite occasional bugs.
LMPM’s support quality cannot be assessed as there are no recent reviews or ratings available. Given Mews’ active support ecosystem and positive feedback, it is the safer option. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, offering extensive flexibility. LMPM has zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and scalability.
This broad ecosystem allows hoteliers to customize workflows, automate processes, and connect with third-party solutions effortlessly. Without integrations, LMPM’s utility is severely limited. Edge: Mews.
Mews’ reviews are 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.12/5. Hoteliers across segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
LMPM’s lack of reviews and ratings means no data exists on user satisfaction. The recent, extensive feedback for Mews underscores its value and reliability. Edge: Mews.
LMPM does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or undocumented fee structure. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fee, but it’s a fixed fee typical for enterprise-grade PMS.
While Mews’s cost might seem higher, the value comes from its features, integrations, support, and proven track record. The opacity of LMPM’s pricing makes it difficult to evaluate its value proposition.
Given the lack of recent review data, LMPM is better suited for very small, uncomplicated setups where risk tolerance is high.
Mews supports a diverse range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with proven success in streamlining operations and enhancing guest experiences.
Mews stands out as a mature, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with a large, active user base. Its extensive integrations, positive recent reviews, and proven track record make it the safer choice for hotels looking to modernize and grow.
LMPM’s limited data, unverified claims, and absence of recent reviews place it at a significant disadvantage. Unless your property operates in a highly niche market with minimal integration needs, Mews is the recommended platform to support your hotel’s future.
In conclusion, if confidence, functionality, and ongoing support are priorities, go with Mews. It offers the reliability and tools your hotel needs to succeed in today’s competitive landscape.
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, LMPM y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. LMPM y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. LMPM ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
LMPM: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. LMPM tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos