The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Persefone destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Mews valoran más su ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, mientras que los usuarios de Persefone destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 329 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 397 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 45 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #3 49 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reseñas | — |
| Lujo ▾ | #5 220 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #2 170 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 130 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #8 106 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #10 17 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #28 8 reseñas | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Persefone by Persefone hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience, while Persefone offers a more traditional, all-in-one platform with a strong Italian legacy. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s current stage and future plans?
Mews is a cloud-native property management system with a high user rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations. Persefone, with over 17 years in the market and more than 3,000 hotels served, is a European-based system renowned for its comprehensive suite of features and reliable support but has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings. Does your hotel prioritize innovative technology and a broad ecosystem, or do you prefer a proven, integrated package with long-term stability?
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a modern, flexible platform favored by boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels, whereas Persefone’s reputation is built on stability and a full set of features, mostly appreciated by Italian hotels. Are you seeking a cutting-edge, scalable system or a tried-and-true solution with deep local expertise?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, go with Mews. Its recent review count and ratings demonstrate active adoption and ongoing improvements, making it ideal for hotels aiming to modernize operations quickly.
If your hotel prefers a traditional, all-in-one software suite with extensive features designed for the Italian market, Persefone might suit your needs better. Its long-standing presence and integrated approach appeal to hotels that value stability and a comprehensive management tool, especially if they operate primarily in Italy or similar markets.
For fast-growing hotels seeking agility, Mews’s open API, marketplace, and rapid innovation are unmatched. Conversely, if you prioritize a fully integrated, regional solution with a history of serving thousands of hotels, Persefone’s deep feature set and support may be advantageous.
Mews boasts a user rating of 4.7/5 for ease of use across 679 reviews, with many hoteliers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and modern design. Recent feedback highlights its simple reservation dashboards, guest messaging, and remote access, supporting staff of all tech skill levels.
Persefone has not publicly shared a recent ease-of-use rating or detailed user feedback, but its long history suggests a traditional, feature-rich interface that may require more training and adaptation, especially for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems. Is your team ready for a modern, user-centric platform or better served by a familiar, all-in-one interface?
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 49 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, automated night audit, guest app, real-time reporting, shift planning, and more. Its broad suite is designed to improve operational agility and guest engagement.
Persefone, on the other hand, consolidates all functionalities into a single web solution, but specific feature counts or unique functionalities are not publicly detailed. It likely includes core hotel management features but lacks the extensive optional modules and customization that Mews provides.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5 from 758 recent reviews, with users often citing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding, though some report occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Its large global team offers 24/7 support, aiding in onboarding and ongoing troubleshooting.
Persefone emphasizes serious technical support, stemming from its 17-year history, but it has no recent review data to gauge current support quality. Its support is reputed to be reliable, especially within Italy, but recent user feedback is unavailable for comparison.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's ecosystem surpasses 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and more, with a vibrant marketplace enabling rapid integration of third-party tools. This vast network allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack with ease.
Persefone offers a fully integrated solution but has no publicly available data on third-party integrations or a marketplace. Its ecosystem is likely more closed, emphasizing stability over flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.62/5 by 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, automation, and excellent support, especially among boutique and city hotels. The high review count and recency indicate a vibrant, satisfied user base.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings published publicly, limiting the ability to gauge user satisfaction today. Its longstanding reputation suggests reliability, but it lacks current data to compare.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, reflecting its enterprise-level automation and extensive features, with no free tier or trial. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 per month, offering a more affordable but less detailed view of its pricing structure, which may include custom quotes for larger hotels.
While Mews’s higher price is justified by its advanced capabilities, Persefone’s lower cost could appeal to smaller or budget-conscious properties. Do your operational needs justify the investment in Mews’s wider capabilities?
Not ideal if your hotel primarily operates in Italy and prefers a traditional, locally supported system with deep regional customization.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid innovation, cloud-native features, or extensive third-party ecosystems.
Mews is a modern, cloud-native PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, supported by a large, active user base that reviews and updates regularly. Its extensive features and marketplace make it a flexible choice for hotels aiming to innovate and scale quickly.
Persefone offers a mature, comprehensive system rooted in Italy, with a focus on stability and all-in-one management, but lacks recent public reviews or a visible ecosystem of integrations. It’s better suited for hotels seeking a regional, stable platform rather than cutting-edge technology.
Choose Mews if your hotel values agility, automation, and a broad ecosystem, especially if you're planning to grow or modernize rapidly. Opt for Persefone if you prefer a long-established, regional solution with a focus on stability and deep feature integration, particularly within the Italian market.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Mews PMS y Persefone comparten 10 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe | ||
| Tarifas personalizadas |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 37 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Mews PMS y Persefone comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Mews PMS ofrece 335 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Persefone ofrece 0. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Mews PMS: No. Persefone: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Mews tiene un HT Score de 100 y Persefone tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos