The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
VIPS destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Mews valoran más su ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, mientras que los usuarios de VIPS destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 329 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 397 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 45 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #3 49 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reseñas | — |
| Lujo ▾ | #5 220 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #2 170 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 130 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #8 106 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #10 17 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #28 8 reseñas | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find a solution that streamlines operations, improves guest experiences, and offers robust integrations. Both Mews PMS and VIPS PMS aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and ecosystem support. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Mews PMS boasts a proven track record with thousands of reviews, high user ratings, and recent positive feedback, making it the more reliable choice for modern hoteliers. VIPS PMS, while offering a broad feature set, lacks recent reviews or a large user base, which diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Mews PMS is the clear leader based on review volume, recent user experiences, and a comprehensive feature set that appeals to a broad spectrum of hotels. Its 758 reviews and 98 recent ones in the last six months demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Meanwhile, VIPS PMS has no recent reviews or user ratings available, making it difficult to assess its current effectiveness.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive ecosystem integrations, and a platform trusted by thousands of properties, Mews is the better choice. For hotels seeking a less proven but potentially adaptable solution, VIPS may be worth exploring, but its lack of recent feedback is a concern.
Both Mews and VIPS aim to automate and simplify hotel operations, but Mews’s established presence provides a more reliable foundation supported by hundreds of reviews and high ratings. Mews excels in streamlining reservations, billing, and guest communication, with a focus on modern, cloud-native hospitality.
VIPS, on the other hand, claims to be an all-in-one, modular system designed to handle bookings, communications, meetings, and self-service check-ins, but lacks recent user feedback to verify its performance. Do you want a platform with recent, proven performance, or are you comfortable testing a less documented solution?
If your hotel needs a mature, widely adopted platform with proven reliability and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and larger properties, with a 4.62/5 overall rating backed by 758 reviews and a recent influx of feedback.
Choose VIPS if you prefer an all-in-one, modular solution that promises flexibility for managing bookings, meetings, and self-service options. However, given the lack of recent reviews and only 11 verified partners, VIPS’s current performance remains uncertain for most hoteliers.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Many mention how staff adoption is smooth, with support teams offering helpful onboarding, making training less burdensome.
VIPS offers a modern interface with a broad feature set, but lacks recent user feedback to confirm usability and onboarding experience. Without recent reviews, assessing its ease of use remains speculative.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews offers 45 shared features with other PMS solutions and 14 features exclusive to it, such as multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated ID scanner, online checkout, and SOC2 compliance. Its marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, covering various operational needs.
VIPS provides a broad feature set including online bookings, guest communications, and self-service check-ins but has no unique features documented outside its core offerings. Currently, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and unique features give it an edge.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with many reviews praising the professionalism, responsiveness, and helpful onboarding assistance. Users note that issues are addressed swiftly, though some mention occasional bugs, which are typically resolved quickly.
VIPS offers no recent reviews or detailed support ratings, which makes evaluating their support quality impossible. Given Mews’s documented support strengths, it remains the more dependable choice.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews has 336 verified integration partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RevControl, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling extensive customization. Its marketplace offers a broad range of third-party tools for revenue management, guest engagement, and operations.
VIPS has only 11 verified partners, including some overlaps with Mews (RevControl, SiteMinder), but fewer options overall. For scalable, flexible integrations, Mews’s ecosystem is clearly superior.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s reviews consistently highlight its ease of use, reliability, and support, resulting in an overall rating of 4.62/5 with 93% likelihood to recommend. It is favored across property types, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and independent hotels.
VIPS has no recent or substantial reviews, so hotel ratings cannot be confidently assessed. Based on available data, Mews’s user ratings are significantly higher and more recent.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or per-room charges, offering transparent and enterprise-grade pricing. VIPS charges $800 per month, also without additional fees but with less transparency about optional costs.
While both are similar, Mews’s larger ecosystem and proven ROI justify its slightly higher price point for most hotels. The decision should consider value and support quality rather than price alone.
Mews is a mature, extensively reviewed PMS platform with proven reliability, boasting a 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, and a rich ecosystem of integrations. Its focus on automation, guest experience, and scalability makes it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially those looking to grow or modernize.
VIPS offers a broad, modular solution with potential flexibility, but the absence of recent reviews and limited partner network raise concerns about current performance and support. If stability and proven results matter most, Mews is the clear choice.
For hotels needing a trusted, fast-growing platform with a strong community, Mews delivers on expectations. If your hotel prefers a newer, flexible approach and is willing to test an emerging system, VIPS may be worth consideration—but proceed cautiously.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Mews PMS y VIPS PMS comparten 45 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aplicación movil | ||
| CRM invitado | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 2 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Mews PMS y VIPS PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Mews PMS ofrece 336 socios de integración verificados, mientras que VIPS PMS ofrece 11. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Mews PMS: No. VIPS PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Mews tiene un HT Score de 99 y VIPS tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos