The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 554 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Acomos se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile App and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Notes comparees basees sur 554 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 5 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 554 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Acomos apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #46 5 avis | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #56 2 avis | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #60 1 avis | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #55 1 avis | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #47 1 avis | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #33 5 avis | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and profitability. Both Acomos by Acomos and HotelTime PMS aim to streamline daily tasks, improve guest management, and enhance operational efficiency. However, they diverge in their market presence, feature sets, user reviews, and support quality, making the decision more nuanced. Are you prioritizing a system with a larger, more recent user base or one that offers unique features tailored to specific hotel types?
Acomos is a UK-based PMS with a long history, boasting five reviews and a 3.1/5 overall rating, but its recent review activity is almost nonexistent. This makes its data less reliable for current decision-making. Conversely, HotelTime PMS has 433 reviews with a 4.83/5 rating and 27 reviews in the last six months, providing fresh insights into its performance. The recent review activity and high ratings make HotelTime's data more relevant for hoteliers today.
Both products aim to simplify hotel management — Acomos offers basic booking and guest management, while HotelTime provides extensive modules for operations, reporting, and integrations. Acomos's older, less active review profile suggests it might lack ongoing improvements, whereas HotelTime’s large, recent review base indicates active development and support. When considering your hotel’s needs, ask: which system aligns better with your current operational challenges?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform capable of managing multiple departments and supporting growth, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—27 unique modules, high user satisfaction, and active development—suits properties of all sizes, from boutique hotels to resorts. Its large user base of over 650 properties across 20+ countries underscores its stability and widespread adoption.
If your hotel requires a simple, straightforward system primarily focused on basic booking and guest management, and you are comfortable with limited features, Acomos might suffice. However, given its small review volume, lack of recent user feedback, and lower overall ratings, HotelTime is the safer, more future-proof option. For most hoteliers, the decision hinges on your need for comprehensive operational tools versus a minimal setup.
HotelTime scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, supported by a 4.63/5 onboarding rating and numerous positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface. Users report that new staff can learn the system quickly, and daily tasks are streamlined. Support responsiveness and ongoing updates further enhance the user experience.
Acomos, with a 3.5/5 ease of use rating, receives mixed reviews. While some users find it straightforward, others complain about bugs, limited support, and difficulty in onboarding. A typical review quotes, “It is very easy to learn and to use,” but negative feedback describes system outages and poor customer support.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 27 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, multi-lingual support, spa and wellness modules, mobile check-in, real-time reporting, employee messaging, automated reminders, and online check-out. These features support complex operations and multi-department management.
Acomos offers only one unique feature: guest SMS communication, with the rest of its capabilities being shared or basic. Its limited feature set and lack of recent updates restrict its ability to meet the evolving needs of modern hotels.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s customer support is highly rated, with a 4.73/5 score and reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses. Customers appreciate the training, onboarding, and ongoing assistance, often citing support as a key reason for their satisfaction.
Acomos’s support ratings are lower at 3.3/5, with reviews describing delays, system bugs, and unhelpful staff. One hotelier complains, “Customer service and staff who know how to operate the system” are lacking, and system outages have caused severe disruptions.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular solutions like SiteMinder, Profitroom, and Bookboost, offering extensive connectivity across distribution, POS, and revenue management tools. Its rich integration ecosystem allows hotels to customize their tech stack.
Acomos has only two verified partners, including SiteMinder, with limited options for third-party integrations. This restricts flexibility and may require manual workarounds, especially for properties with complex, multi-channel distribution needs.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime's 433 reviews with a 4.83/5 rating reflect strong satisfaction across hotel segments, from resorts to city center hotels. Many reviews praise its extensive features, ease of use, and support quality, with a recent review stating, “HotelTime is a great tool for managing reservations from anywhere.”
Acomos’s five reviews yield an average of 3.1/5, with feedback ranging from satisfaction for its simplicity to frustration over bugs and support issues. Its older reviews, some from 2018, cannot reliably reflect current performance.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Acomos does not publicly list its pricing, and its lack of recent reviews suggests it may have limited or custom pricing models. In contrast, HotelTime charges a flat fee of $600 upfront, with no ongoing subscription fees, but this fee covers access to a comprehensive cloud system.
While the upfront cost for HotelTime may seem significant, its extensive features, support, and integrations often justify the investment, especially for larger or growing properties.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a feature-rich, actively supported platform with extensive integrations, suited for hotels of all sizes aiming for operational efficiency. Acomos, on the other hand, is a more basic system with limited recent support and features, best suited for small properties with straightforward needs.
Choose Acomos if your hotel requires minimal management tools and you are cost-sensitive, but be aware you may face limitations and support challenges. HotelTime is the better choice for most hotels that want a scalable, reliable, and comprehensive PMS with ongoing updates and support.
If your priority is a broad feature set, strong support, and proven market presence, HotelTime is the clear winner. For simplicity and budget-conscious setups, Acomos could suffice but with caution about its support and feature limitations.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Acomos et HotelTime PMS partagent 24 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application mobile | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Scanner d'identité et de passeport intégré |
Affichage des principales differences. 16 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Acomos et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Acomos propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 3.5/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Acomos : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Acomos a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits