The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 57 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Aiosell Technologies se distingue en matiere de seamless integration and usability , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Guest Messaging.
ASA Hotelsoftware se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Notes comparees basees sur 57 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $100/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Avis verifies | 46 | 11 |
Apres analyse de 57 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Aiosell Technologies apprecient surtout seamless integration and usability, assistance et service client, channel management, tandis que ceux de ASA Hotelsoftware mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Seamless Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance et service client
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Automatisation et efficacité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Marge d'amélioration
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et personnalisation
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #23 23 avis | #49 4 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #40 5 avis | #43 6 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #49 0 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #40 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #32 9 avis | #61 1 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #28 9 avis | #51 2 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #32 3 avis | #59 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #30 4 avis | #39 2 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #34 2 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #45 0 avis | #27 11 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #8 29 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #10 3 avis | — |
Choosing between Aiosell Property Management System and ASA Hotel Software hinges on your hotel's unique needs and operational priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management but approach this goal differently: Aiosell offers a comprehensive, all-in-one solution with automation and integration at its core, while ASA emphasizes versatility and ease of use with a broad suite of modules.
Aiosell’s focus on affordability, automation, and extensive integration makes it appealing for properties seeking to unify their operations, especially in markets like South America and Asia Pacific. Conversely, ASA’s strong market presence in Europe, with a higher review count and recent positive feedback, suggests a more mature and trusted platform for many European hoteliers.
Are you looking for a single, affordable system that handles everything from reservations to revenue management? Or do you need a flexible, modular tool that can adapt to complex management workflows? Your choice depends on these priorities.
Aiosell is the stronger choice overall, boasting more reviews (36 vs. 11), higher recent review activity, and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Its overall rating of 0/5 might be misleading due to the review structure, but the high score in support, onboarding, and ease of use reflects solid satisfaction from users.
ASA scores a perfect 5/5 in overall rating and is highly rated for its versatility and ease of use. However, its smaller review base and limited recent feedback mean it’s less validated than Aiosell.
Given the recent reviews and broader adoption, Aiosell is the recommended platform for most hotels seeking an integrated, user-friendly, and cost-effective PMS. ASA remains a strong contender if your hotel operates primarily in Europe and values a modular approach with excellent support.
Both Aiosell and ASA aim to simplify hotel operations, but they diverge in approach. Aiosell consolidates all hotel management functions into one system, emphasizing automation, integration, and affordability, with a focus on regions like South America and Asia Pacific. It offers key modules like channel management, booking engine, and revenue tools, all in a single platform, designed for properties that want an all-in-one solution.
ASA, on the other hand, provides a flexible suite of modules, with a strong presence in Europe and a focus on versatility. It offers specialized features such as spa & wellness, gift vouchers, and staff shift planning, catering to hotels with diverse operational needs. Its modular nature allows hotels to pick what they need, but it may require more configuration.
Where do your hotel’s operational challenges lie? Is it in integrating multiple functions into one platform or customizing workflows across departments? This fundamental difference guides the better fit.
Edge: Aiosell
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS that combines reservations, channel management, and revenue optimization into a single platform, go with Aiosell. Its review count (36 vs. 11) and recent activity make it a more validated choice, especially if affordability and automation are priorities.
If your hotel requires a flexible, modular system that supports complex workflows, specialized departments like spa or wellness, and operates primarily in Europe, ASA is the better option. Its versatility and well-regarded support make it suitable for larger or multi-faceted properties.
For independent hotels or those with limited technical staff, Aiosell’s simplicity and automation ease daily management. Larger hotels or resorts needing tailor-made workflows and department-specific modules might find ASA more adaptable.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell boasts a UI rated 4.75/5, and users praise its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers mention that even staff with minimal technical skills can operate it efficiently, and its automation features reduce manual work.
ASA also scores highly for usability, with a 4.73/5 rating. Users highlight its logical flow, search functions, and ease of learning, especially for staff familiar with hotel operations. Its modular setup allows hotel teams to customize workflows without complexity.
Considering recent review activity, Aiosell’s larger user base and consistent positive feedback suggest marginally better real-world usability, especially for those seeking an all-in-one platform.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell offers 49 features, including unique modules like a booking engine, channel manager, automated reminders, PCI compliance, integrated CRS, rules-based room assignments, tablet check-in, guest messaging, and employee messaging. These features help streamline operations and enhance automation, especially in revenue management.
ASA provides 40 shared features plus six unique modules like spa & wellness, gift vouchers, voice-to-text tasks, guest app, shift planning, and on-premise management. While versatile, it may lack some of the integrated automation tools of Aiosell.
If integrated revenue management and automation are priorities, Aiosell’s extensive feature set gives it an edge. For hotels needing specific modules like spa management or guest apps, ASA offers targeted solutions.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell’s customer support is rated 4.75/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and effective issue resolution. Users appreciate the onboarding process, with a rating of 4.79/5, and mention that support helps ensure smooth operations.
ASA’s support ranks 4.73/5, with users praising its ongoing updates and dedicated contact points. While generally positive, some reviews note that certain matters could be addressed faster, but the overall experience remains strong.
Given the more recent activity and higher review count, Aiosell’s support reputation appears slightly more robust, especially for properties valuing quick onboarding and ongoing assistance.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell connects with 12 verified partners, including industry-standard providers like STAAH, SiteMinder, and Hotelogix. Its integrations cover channel management, booking engines, and other core systems, ensuring smooth data flow.
ASA has 49 verified partners, including top industry players like Fairmas, Customer Alliance, and Vertical Booking. Its broader ecosystem offers more options, particularly for specialized modules and regional integrations.
If your hotel relies on specific third-party systems or prefers a more extensive integration network, ASA’s higher partner count provides flexibility. However, for core hotel operations, Aiosell’s integrations are sufficient.
Edge: ASA
Aiosell’s 36 reviews, primarily from recent months, reflect a 97% likelihood to recommend and an overall rating of 0/5 (likely due to review confusion). Support, onboarding, and ease of use are praised, especially for automation and channel management.
ASA, with 11 reviews mainly from Europe, scores a perfect 5/5 overall, with high praise for its versatility and user satisfaction. Its property segments—resorts and boutique hotels—particularly rate it highly.
Given the recent review activity, Aiosell’s feedback indicates growing confidence and satisfaction, making it the more validated choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell’s base price is $100, with no freemium or hidden fees. Its affordable pricing makes it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels seeking an all-in-one system.
ASA’s starting price is $1,000, with no subscription tiers or trial info available. Its higher cost reflects its broader modularity and target market of larger or more complex properties.
If budget is a key consideration, Aiosell offers significant value. Larger hotels or those with specific department needs may find ASA’s premium modules justify the investment.
Edge: Aiosell
Not ideal if you require highly specialized modules like spa management or have complex pricing models that depend on custom formulas.
If your hotel values simplicity, automation, and broad regional support, Aiosell is your best fit.
Not ideal if you prioritize affordability over modularity or operate in regions with limited ASA support.
If your hotel needs a versatile, department-specific solution with a proven European market presence, ASA is the right choice.
Aiosell provides a straightforward, cost-effective, and highly integrated PMS designed for hotels that want an all-in-one system with automation. Its recent reviews and broader market presence make it a reliable choice for independent hotels, especially in emerging regions.
ASA offers a highly versatile platform with specialized modules, mainly suited for European properties or hotels with complex, department-specific workflows. Its extensive partner network and high customer ratings reflect its maturity and adaptability.
If simplicity, automation, and affordability are your priorities, go with Aiosell. If your hotel benefits from modularity, specialized features, and a broad integration ecosystem, ASA may better serve your needs.
Final Recommendation: For most hoteliers evaluating these options, Aiosell emerges as the stronger, more validated choice considering recent review activity, user satisfaction, and overall value.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $1,000/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Aiosell - Property Management System et ASA Hotel Software partagent 40 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reminders | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Sur place |
Affichage des principales differences. 3 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine in... Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine into one platform. This integration facilitates efficient management, saves time, and enhances control over hotel operations.
L'équipe d'assistance d'Aiosell est souvent décrite comme réactive et efficace pour résoudre rapidement les problèmes. Ce support fiable contribue à u... L'équipe d'assistance d'Aiosell est souvent décrite comme réactive et efficace pour résoudre rapidement les problèmes. Ce support fiable contribue à une expérience utilisateur positive en garantissant un fonctionnement fluide et en fournissant une assistance en cas de besoin.
Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data... Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data synchronization across platforms optimizes occupancy and offers streamlined channel management.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Bien qu'Aiosell soit largement bien considéré, les utilisateurs soulignent des domaines de croissance potentielle, tels que la fourniture d'options d'... Bien qu'Aiosell soit largement bien considéré, les utilisateurs soulignent des domaines de croissance potentielle, tels que la fourniture d'options d'intégration plus flexibles, l'amélioration des expériences d'applications mobiles et l'offre de corrections de bogues et de personnalisations plus avancées.
Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accurac... Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accuracy. Detailed reporting could aid in strategic decision-making by providing better insights.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Aiosell - Property Management System et ASA Hotel Software partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Aiosell - Property Management System propose 12 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que ASA Hotel Software en propose 49. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Aiosell - Property Management System est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Aiosell - Property Management System : Non. ASA Hotel Software : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Aiosell Technologies a un HT Score de 78 et ASA Hotelsoftware a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits