The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 48 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Aiosell Technologies se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Bnovo (Биново) se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 48 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 46 | 2 |
Apres analyse de 48 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Aiosell Technologies apprecient surtout seamless integration and usability, assistance et service client, channel management, tandis que ceux de Bnovo (Биново) mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Seamless Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance et service client
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Automatisation et efficacité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Marge d'amélioration
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et personnalisation
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #23 23 avis | #55 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #40 5 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #49 0 avis | #51 0 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #40 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #32 9 avis | #70 1 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #28 9 avis | #70 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #32 3 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge | #30 4 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #34 2 avis | — |
| Europe | #45 0 avis | #39 2 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #8 29 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #10 3 avis | — |
Choosing between Aiosell's Property Management System (PMS) and Bnovo PMS hinges on your hotel's operational needs and strategic priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, support, and market presence. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize ease of use, automation, integrations, or support quality—each product's strengths and weaknesses shape their suitability.
Aiosell offers a well-rounded, feature-rich platform with recent positive reviews and high user ratings, positioning it as a top choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive yet user-friendly PMS. Bnovo, while less reviewed and rated, provides basic functionalities and channel management but struggles with support and stability, making it less attractive for most properties today.
Both Aiosell and Bnovo aim to simplify hotel operations through automation and integration, but they differ greatly in review volume and recency. Aiosell has 36 reviews, with 3 in the last six months, and a high likelihood to recommend at 97%, indicating recent positive feedback. Bnovo, with only 2 reviews, has not received any recent feedback, and its overall rating remains low at 2.25 out of 5, with support issues frequently cited.
Aiosell's reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and robust features, while Bnovo's users lament interface issues, crashes, and poor support. The recent focus on Aiosell's platform and its high review count strengthen its credibility, whereas Bnovo’s sparse and outdated reviews suggest less current trust. Are you willing to rely on a less-reviewed, potentially unstable system, or do you prefer proven performance backed by recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS with a user-friendly interface, automation, and strong support, go with Aiosell. It suits independent hotels, vacation rentals, and boutique properties looking for an all-in-one, cost-effective solution that simplifies daily operations and increases revenue through AI-driven dynamic pricing.
If your hotel primarily requires basic booking and channel management with minimal automation, and support isn't a priority, Bnovo might suffice. It appeals to smaller motels and villas in Europe and Russia prioritizing affordability and simple connectivity, but its low ratings and support concerns make it a less reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth.
Aiosell scores 4.75 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive, accessible interface and minimal training needs. Its onboarding process is rated very highly at 4.79, and users find it straightforward to navigate even without technical expertise. Support responsiveness further enhances usability, making daily management less stressful.
Bnovo, with a 3 out of 5 ease-of-use rating, receives consistent complaints about interface instability, mobile app issues, and support delays. Reviewers describe its mobile booking model as "very bad," and some report system crashes that hinder operations. Given recent feedback, it’s clear that Aiosell provides a smoother, more reliable user experience.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell boasts 30 unique features not found in Bnovo, including automated night audits, guest messaging, digital registration, and integrated payment solutions. Its extensive automation covers tasks like real-time status updates, automated room assignments, and PCI/GDPR compliance—crucial for modern hotels.
Bnovo offers only the core functionalities shared with Aiosell (19 features), and lacks advanced automation and integrations. It provides connectors to OTAs and basic booking management but misses sophisticated tools like AI-powered dynamic pricing, task management, or housekeeper mobile apps.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell's customer support is rated 4.75 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing its quick, helpful responses and smooth onboarding. Users report support issues are rare, and when they occur, the team resolves them efficiently, contributing to a positive overall experience.
Conversely, Bnovo’s support scores only 1.25 out of 5, with reviews describing it as "very bad," slow, and unhelpful. Customers complain about unresolved bugs, poor mobile support, and difficulty fixing system issues, which can seriously hinder hotel operations.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell has verified integrations with 12 partners including STAAH, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and more, facilitating extensive connectivity for distribution, payments, and analytics. Its wide partner network supports a seamless flow of data across systems, reducing manual input and errors.
Bnovo, with only 2 verified partners, offers limited integration options, primarily connecting with one OTA platform. This reduces flexibility and may necessitate manual workarounds, especially as your property scales or adopts new distribution channels.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell has a significantly higher review score, with many recent reviews praising its ease of use, automation, and support. It has a 97% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high customer satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, especially independent hotels and boutique properties.
Bnovo’s reviews are scarce and largely negative, with an overall rating of 2.25/5. Its users, mainly motels and villas, cite interface bugs and support failure as major pain points, indicating lower confidence in its reliability.
Edge: Aiosell
Aiosell is priced at a flat monthly fee of $100, with no implementation or extra charges, making it predictable and accessible for small to medium-sized hotels. Pricing details for Bnovo are not publicly available, but it’s described as "a bit cheaper," though often with trade-offs in support and stability.
Since Bnovo's pricing remains opaque, and support issues seem prevalent, its lower cost may not translate into better value. Conversely, Aiosell's transparent pricing and feature set justify its fee through reliable performance and ongoing updates.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Aiosell provides a mature, feature-rich platform with recent reviews and high satisfaction levels, making it the better choice for most hotels today. Its automation, integrations, and support are well-suited for properties aiming to grow and optimize revenue.
Bnovo, while offering basic connectivity and affordability, suffers from limited features, support issues, and outdated reviews. It might serve very small or budget-conscious properties temporarily, but its lack of recent positive feedback makes it less compelling for hotels seeking reliability and growth.
If your hotel needs a dependable, comprehensive PMS that boosts efficiency and guest satisfaction, Aiosell is the clear winner. Its recent reviews and high ratings reinforce its position as the better option for most properties.
However, if you operate a small, budget-sensitive property in Europe or Russia and can tolerate support challenges, Bnovo might be a stopgap solution—though better alternatives are available.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating modern PMS options, Aiosell stands out as the more trustworthy and feature-complete platform.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Aiosell - Property Management System et Bnovo PMS partagent 19 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application mobile | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Affichage des principales differences. 18 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine in... Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine into one platform. This integration facilitates efficient management, saves time, and enhances control over hotel operations.
L'équipe d'assistance d'Aiosell est souvent décrite comme réactive et efficace pour résoudre rapidement les problèmes. Ce support fiable contribue à u... L'équipe d'assistance d'Aiosell est souvent décrite comme réactive et efficace pour résoudre rapidement les problèmes. Ce support fiable contribue à une expérience utilisateur positive en garantissant un fonctionnement fluide et en fournissant une assistance en cas de besoin.
Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data... Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data synchronization across platforms optimizes occupancy and offers streamlined channel management.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Bien qu'Aiosell soit largement bien considéré, les utilisateurs soulignent des domaines de croissance potentielle, tels que la fourniture d'options d'... Bien qu'Aiosell soit largement bien considéré, les utilisateurs soulignent des domaines de croissance potentielle, tels que la fourniture d'options d'intégration plus flexibles, l'amélioration des expériences d'applications mobiles et l'offre de corrections de bogues et de personnalisations plus avancées.
Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accurac... Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accuracy. Detailed reporting could aid in strategic decision-making by providing better insights.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Aiosell - Property Management System et Bnovo PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Aiosell - Property Management System propose 12 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Bnovo PMS en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Aiosell - Property Management System est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 3.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Aiosell - Property Management System : Non. Bnovo PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Aiosell Technologies a un HT Score de 78 et Bnovo (Биново) a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits