The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 551 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bnovo (Биново) se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Notes comparees basees sur 551 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 2 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 551 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bnovo (Биново) apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #55 1 avis | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #51 0 avis | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 avis | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #70 0 avis | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #39 2 avis | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and overall profitability. You are evaluating Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME, both designed to automate core tasks but differing greatly in maturity, features, and support. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent reviews, extensive features, or cost—each product aims to streamline hotel operations but targets different hotel profiles.
Bnovo offers a more affordable, simpler solution primarily serving motels and villas with limited reviews and less recent feedback. HotelTime, with over 430 recent reviews, offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform preferred by a wide range of property types, especially larger or more complex hotels. Which aligns better with your current needs and growth plans?
Both Bnovo and HotelTime aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge sharply in their maturity and user feedback. Bnovo’s limited review count (only 2) and lack of recent feedback suggest a less stable or widely adopted platform, especially outside its core markets. Conversely, HotelTime boasts 433 reviews, with 27 from the last 6 months, offering a more current and representative user perspective.
HotelTime's reviews highlight its robust real-time management, automation, and extensive integrations, making it appear more suited for hospitality businesses seeking scalability and advanced features. Bnovo’s reviews underscore connectivity to sales channels and ease of implementation but also mention stability issues and poor support. Do you need a proven, well-supported PMS or a more niche, budget-friendly option?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that supports complex operations, extensive integrations, and has a proven track record, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and properties that need automation, POS, spa modules, and detailed reporting—evidenced by its 4.83/5 rating and extensive third-party partnerships.
If your hotel is small, budget-sensitive, or in a region where Bnovo’s language-specific knowledge base and channel integrations suffice, then Bnovo might suit your needs. However, be aware that its limited reviews and recent feedback indicate potential stability and support concerns. For most hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive features, HotelTime’s more recent, higher-rated offering is the safer choice.
Bnovo’s user ratings reflect a moderate ease of use at 3/5, with particular praise for its implementation process and personal room layout. However, reviews cite a "disgusting interface" and frequent server crashes, making the platform frustrating and difficult to adopt fully.
HotelTime scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, with users describing its interface as intuitive and management reporting as simple and clear. Its onboarding process is highly rated at 4.63/5, and users frequently mention how quickly staff adapt to it. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 32 features exclusive to its platform, including guest CRM, automated night audits, online check-in, mobile app, real-time reporting, and integrated payment terminals—features critical for larger or multifaceted properties. Bnovo, with no unique features listed, only shares 19 common features, indicating a more streamlined or basic function set.
HotelTime’s broader feature set allows for better automation, guest management, and operational control, making it more adaptable to complex property needs. Bnovo’s features may suffice for simple operations but lack depth for expansion. Edge: HotelTime.
Support ratings show a stark contrast: Bnovo scores a mere 1.25/5, with reviews criticizing support responsiveness and bug fixes, sometimes describing the support as "very bad." Users report support staff working "not in accordance with ITIL standards" and experiencing prolonged outages.
HotelTime’s support is rated 4.73/5, with reviewers citing quick, helpful responses and excellent onboarding. Clients describe their support as "responsive and knowledgeable," which significantly eases implementation and troubleshooting. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partner integrations, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, alongside extensive third-party modules. Bnovo only lists 2 verified partners—Compare.me and Aiosell Technologies—limiting its connectivity options.
This extensive integration ecosystem makes HotelTime more flexible, allowing your hotel to build a comprehensive tech stack. Bnovo’s limited integrations restrict potential automation and data sharing. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews, with 27 recent comments, consistently rate the platform highly, especially among larger properties and chains, with an overall score of 4.83/5. Hoteliers praise its user-friendliness, automation, and dedicated support.
Bnovo’s limited reviews (only 2) and ratings (2/5 overall) reflect dissatisfaction with stability and support, especially concerning server crashes and bugs. HotelTime’s stronger recent feedback makes it the preferred choice for property owners seeking reliable, well-reviewed software. Edge: HotelTime.
Bnovo does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a customized quote based on property size and needs. HotelTime charges a base fee of $600 per month, which covers a broad array of features and integrations.
While HotelTime’s pricing is transparent, it is higher than Bnovo’s, reflecting its extensive capabilities. Budget-conscious hotels might lean toward Bnovo, but larger properties requiring reliability and features will find the value in HotelTime’s investment.
Hotels or hostels that:
Teams that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Teams that:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime is a mature, feature-rich platform with a broad integration ecosystem, making it suitable for larger or complex properties. Bnovo, while more affordable, is less stable, has fewer features, and lacks recent positive reviews, indicating less reliability and support.
If your hotel prioritizes automation, integrations, and support, HotelTime’s higher investment is justified. For small, budget-minded properties with minimal needs, Bnovo might suffice but comes with significant risks.
HotelTime’s extensive reviews and recent feedback confirm it as the more dependable, scalable solution. Bnovo’s limited, older reviews make it a riskier choice unless your property’s scope is very narrow.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for growth, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction, HotelTime’s platform is the recommended option. Bnovo may only be viable for small, simple operations in specific regions, but its support issues and limited features caution against relying on it long-term.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bnovo PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent 19 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application mobile | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes |
Affichage des principales differences. 20 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Mieux classe pour
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bnovo PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bnovo PMS propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 3.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bnovo PMS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bnovo (Биново) a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits