The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Backing the packers se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Backing the packers apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing between Backing the packers and HotelTime PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both aim to improve hotel management, but they approach this differently—Backing the packers as an AI-driven review insights platform, and HotelTime as a comprehensive property management system. Your decision will depend on whether you prioritize customer feedback analysis or a full PMS with extensive features.
Backing the packers offers insights gleaned from customer reviews, but it does not provide operational management tools. HotelTime PMS, meanwhile, offers a feature-rich, cloud-based platform designed to run your hotel daily. Which type of solution will truly elevate your property?
Backing the packers is a customer feedback analytics platform that helps you interpret reviews and identify patterns, improving your service quality based on guest sentiments. HotelTime PMS, by contrast, provides an all-in-one management system that handles reservations, billing, housekeeping, and more, directly impacting your daily operations.
Backing the packers boasts no reviews or recent feedback, making it hard to gauge its practical value for hotel management. HotelTime, however, has 433 reviews with recent feedback, indicating active usage and ongoing improvements. Would you rather improve your guest experience through insights or streamline operations with a full PMS?
If your hotel needs a full software suite to manage reservations, billing, housekeeping, and guest services, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—including integrations with POS, channel management, and automation tools—suits properties seeking operational efficiency.
If, however, your team requires a tool to analyze customer reviews for strategic improvements, Backing the packers could be helpful. But given its lack of reviews and recent feedback, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer, more reliable option for hotels looking to optimize daily operations.
HotelTime PMS scores 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its mobile access and real-time reporting further simplify daily management, with support from a dedicated team.
Backing the packers, however, has no available usability ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to judge how quickly your staff could adopt its platform or insights. Given HotelTime’s strong user reviews, edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, EPoS, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, and more. These tools directly facilitate hotel operations, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Backing the packers does not list any exclusive features, focusing solely on review analysis and AI summaries. For hotel management, HotelTime’s extensive feature set provides tangible tools that Backing the packers cannot match, so edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime earns a customer support rating of 4.73 out of 5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance. Its onboarding process is rated 4.63, indicating strong support during implementation.
Backing the packers, lacking user reviews, offers no data on support quality. Based on available ratings, HotelTime’s support is clearly superior—edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, alongside their own modules like booking engine and channel manager. This extensive network enhances operational flexibility.
Backing the packers has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its compatibility with other hotel systems. For a fully connected tech stack, edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s overall rating is 4.83 out of 5, based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its operational benefits across varied hotel types. Its property-specific ratings, such as a 5/5 for city center hotels, underscore satisfaction across segments.
Backing the packers has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. HotelTime’s proven positive reputation establishes it as the preferred choice—edge: HotelTime PMS.
Backing the packers does not list any pricing details, suggesting it might be a custom or subscription-based service with variable costs. HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no free tier, offering a transparent pricing model.
Without clear pricing from Backing the packers, HotelTime’s flat-rate fee provides clarity. For budgeting, HotelTime’s known cost simplifies decision-making.
Backing the packers is suited for properties emphasizing reputation management or guest experience analysis rather than operational management.
HotelTime is ideal for properties that need a flexible, comprehensive PMS to streamline daily tasks and enhance guest experiences.
HotelTime PMS is a feature-rich, cloud-based platform with proven success across diverse hotel types, especially large properties and resorts. Its extensive integrations, ongoing support, and recent positive reviews make it a reliable choice for hotel operators aiming for operational excellence.
Backing the packers offers an innovative approach with AI-driven review insights, but its lack of recent feedback and operational features limits its practical application. If your goal is to enhance guest satisfaction through review analysis, it might help, but for daily management, HotelTime provides concrete tools.
Choose HotelTime PMS if you need a proven, comprehensive management solution with active support and broad integrations. Opt for Backing the packers if your focus is strategic reputation management and your hotel’s review data is a critical asset you want to analyze regularly.
This comparison balances the strengths of HotelTime’s extensive, proven platform against the innovative, but less established, approach of Backing the packers. For most hotels looking for a dependable management system, HotelTime’s recent reviews, rich feature set, and support make it the clearer choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Backing the packers et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Backing the packers et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Backing the packers propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Backing the packers : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Backing the packers a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 91. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits