The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 79 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Visioni S.R.L. se distingue .
Clock se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (5.0/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Notes comparees basees sur 79 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 79 |
Apres analyse de 79 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Visioni S.R.L. apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Clock mettent en avant ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, service client et assistance. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Service client et assistance
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et connectivité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface mobile et utilisateur
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #21 19 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #14 28 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #17 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #5 5 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #18 30 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #18 14 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #15 15 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #16 8 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #17 11 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #9 38 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #12 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #18 2 avis |
Choosing between Be MyGuest CRS and Clock HMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management but differ markedly in scope, features, and user experience. Be MyGuest specializes in reservation and distribution management, while Clock offers a comprehensive hotel management suite with extensive operational tools.
Given their differing focus areas, your decision should reflect whether your hotel needs a reservation-centric platform or an all-in-one management system. Do you prioritize direct booking optimization or operational efficiency across multiple departments?
Both products aim to modernize hotel operations, but they do so with different core functionalities. Be MyGuest is a dedicated CRS designed to increase direct bookings and optimize distribution strategies through detailed data analysis, interfacing with RMS and Google Analytics. Conversely, Clock is a full-featured HMS that manages reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, housekeeping, and more, all within one platform.
While Be MyGuest’s focus is on improving your distribution channels and data insights, Clock emphasizes operational workflows and guest experience management. The decision hinges on whether your primary goal is boosting direct bookings or streamlining daily operations.
Another key contrast is the user base and regional presence. Be MyGuest's reviews are scarce, with little recent feedback, and no reviews in the last six months, indicating limited recent performance data. In contrast, Clock boasts 63 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, extensive integrations, and positive impact on revenue. Would you prefer a system with robust, recent feedback or one with a more niche, reservation-focused background?
Finally, the platforms differ significantly in scope: Be MyGuest is a centralized reservation system with interface capabilities with RMS, while Clock offers a broad management ecosystem, including POS, event booking, and guest portals. Does your hotel need a specialized reservation tool or a full suite of management features? How critical is recent user feedback to your decision?
Edge: Clock HMS.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one management system that covers reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, and operations, Clock is the clear choice. It is especially suited for hotels looking to improve revenue through dynamic pricing and operational automation. Clock’s extensive feature set—49 features compared to none in Be MyGuest—makes it ideal for hotels that want a unified platform.
If, however, your focus is on enhancing distribution, analyzing website performance, and generating detailed reservation reports, Be MyGuest might appeal. Its core strength lies in managing reservations and interfaces with RMS platforms, which benefits hotels aiming to optimize their sales channels.
Considering recent reviews, Clock's features and user satisfaction ratings are stronger indicators of its suitability for your hotel. Be MyGuest’s limited recent feedback and lack of reviews make it less reliable as a decision-making tool today.
In summary, choose Clock if operational efficiency and revenue optimization are your priorities. Opt for Be MyGuest if distribution management and data analysis are your main concerns.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.73/5, with multiple reviews highlighting its straightforward interface, constant updates, and excellent support. Many users describe Clock as "easy to use" and commend its intuitive booking flow, with onboarding rated at 4.71/5. Users note that despite its extensive features, the system remains accessible, with support teams actively assisting during setup.
In contrast, Be MyGuest has a zero-rated usability score, and no recent reviews or feedback are available to assess its user experience. Its limited publicly available information and lack of recent user insights suggest it may not be as user-friendly or well-supported currently.
Given the recent and plentiful reviews, Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock offers a vast array of 49 features, including booking engine, multi-currency support, channel management, POS, guest feedback management, digital registration, online check-in/out, real-time reporting, and integrated CRS. These features directly support operational management, guest engagement, and revenue strategies.
Be MyGuest’s feature set appears limited to reservation management and reporting, with no distinct features listed beyond its core CRS functions. Its primary strength is interfacing with RMS and optimizing distribution, but it lacks the breadth of operational tools Clock provides.
Considering the feature count, Clock’s extensive capabilities give it a clear edge for hotels seeking a fully integrated management platform. Be MyGuest’s narrower scope may suffice only for reservation and distribution needs.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock’s support and onboarding ratings are strong at 4.78/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and continuous improvements. Many users describe the support team as attentive, helpful, and vital during onboarding and troubleshooting. Recent reviews emphasize consistent support quality, which is critical for complex systems.
Be MyGuest, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it difficult to assess its customer service quality. The lack of recent feedback and low review count suggest limited support visibility, which could pose risks for new users.
Based on current data, Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock boasts 111 verified integrations, including popular partners like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, Flexipass, Profitroom, RevControl, and several booking engines and channel managers. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across sales channels, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Be MyGuest has no listed verified partners, limiting its integration capabilities and potentially requiring manual data handling or additional development work. For hotels prioritizing connectivity with various platforms, Clock’s extensive partner network is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Clock HMS.
With 63 recent reviews, Clock receives an overall rating of 4.88/5, and a likelihood to recommend of 95%. Users from various segments—boutique hotels, city center properties, and independent hotels—rate it highly for ease of use, support, and features. Many reviews mention the positive revenue impact and efficient management.
In contrast, Be MyGuest has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited user engagement and less confidence in its ongoing performance.
Given the recent and high ratings, Clock clearly holds the higher hotelier approval.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Be MyGuest’s pricing information is unavailable, which can make budget planning difficult. Its lack of transparency suggests it might be customized or less accessible for smaller hotels or those seeking straightforward pricing.
Clock’s base price is $600 per month, with no additional connection fees or hidden costs. Its transparent pricing model appeals to hotels wanting predictable expenses, especially given its extensive feature set.
Considering the clarity and value offered, Clock presents a more straightforward investment for most hotels.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Not ideal if:
In essence, Be MyGuest suits hotels looking for a reservation-focused, distribution-enhancing solution without complex operational features.
Not ideal if:
Clock is ideal for hotels that want a broad, integrated approach to hotel management and revenue growth.
Clock HMS stands out as the more comprehensive, well-reviewed, and feature-rich platform suited for modern hotels seeking operational automation combined with revenue optimization. Its extensive integrations, high hotelier ratings, and recent reviews reinforce its reliability and versatility.
Be MyGuest CRS, while focused on reservations and distribution, lacks recent feedback and a broad feature set, making it less suitable for hotels needing a full management ecosystem. It may serve niche purposes but falls short for hotels aiming to streamline multiple departments.
If your hotel needs a full management system with proven user satisfaction, Clock HMS is the clear choice. Choose Be MyGuest if your priority is reservation and distribution control, and you are comfortable with limited recent user validation.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Be MyGuest CRS et Clock HMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Renseignements sur les prix | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 37 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 2 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ offre un service client fiable, reconnu pour sa réactivité et son efficacité. Bien que généralement apprécié, certains utilisateurs signale... Clock PMS+ offre un service client fiable, reconnu pour sa réactivité et son efficacité. Bien que généralement apprécié, certains utilisateurs signalent des erreurs ponctuelles dans les instructions et la nécessité de consulter un expert. Ils suggèrent également des améliorations concernant l'ergonomie et l'assistance pour les fonctionnalités complexes.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Bien que Clock PMS+ réponde aux besoins analytiques essentiels, de nombreux utilisateurs souhaitent des rapports plus performants et personnalisables.... Bien que Clock PMS+ réponde aux besoins analytiques essentiels, de nombreux utilisateurs souhaitent des rapports plus performants et personnalisables. Ils aimeraient notamment une intégration avec Excel et des analyses financières et des indicateurs opérationnels plus détaillés. Certains utilisateurs jugent les rapports existants insuffisants et complexes à exploiter pour en tirer des conclusions pertinentes.
Les utilisateurs ont manifesté leur intérêt pour davantage d'options de personnalisation et de paramètres flexibles afin de répondre aux besoins spéci... Les utilisateurs ont manifesté leur intérêt pour davantage d'options de personnalisation et de paramètres flexibles afin de répondre aux besoins spécifiques des hôtels. Bien que globalement satisfaits, certains utilisateurs expriment le souhait de pouvoir modifier les rapports et les paramètres d'interface pour mieux accompagner les opérations dynamiques et les stratégies marketing.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Be MyGuest CRS et Clock HMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Be MyGuest CRS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Clock HMS en propose 111. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Clock HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Be MyGuest CRS : Non. Clock HMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Visioni S.R.L. a un HT Score de 0 et Clock a 79. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits