Blastness Revenue Management System vs. Infor EzRMS:
Lequel vous convient le mieux ?

The Decision

Choosing between Blastness Revenue Management System (Blastness RMS) and Infor EzRMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both systems aim to optimize your revenue through data-driven pricing strategies, but they differ significantly in user experience, features, support, and integration capabilities. Blastness, with its high user ratings and recent reviews, presents a compelling option for hotels seeking simplicity and a broad feature set. Infor, while established, has fewer recent reviews and a more complex interface.

Blastness offers a more modern, accessible platform with a focus on ease of use and innovative features, whereas Infor’s system leans toward extensive customization and detailed reporting. Which qualities matter most for your team’s revenue goals and operational style?

Is Blastness RMS or Infor EzRMS Better for Hotels?

Blastness RMS and Infor EzRMS both address the core challenge of optimizing hotel revenue via automated pricing and forecasting. Blastness aims to simplify revenue management with a highly rated, intuitive platform that integrates seamlessly with PMS and other systems, making it suitable for independent hotels and boutique properties. Infor, on the other hand, provides a more complex, modular solution that caters to large chains and hotels needing extensive customization.

Blastness’ recent reviews and high scores—97 reviews with 12 in the last six months and a 99% likelihood to recommend—make it the stronger choice for hotels valuing current user feedback. Infor’s lower review count and older feedback suggest it may not be as responsive or aligned with modern hotel needs.

Are you looking for an easy-to-use system with proven recent support, or a highly customizable platform with deep reporting capabilities? Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and your team’s technical comfort level.

Blastness vs Infor: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement RMS that enhances direct bookings, boosts revenue, and offers a user-friendly interface, Blastness is the better fit. It excels in supporting independent, boutique, and city-center hotels with its 23 exclusive features like AI optimization, customizable dashboards, and market intelligence data.

If you require a highly customizable, enterprise-level system capable of managing large multi-property portfolios with advanced automation, detailed reporting, and integration flexibility, Infor’s solution is suitable. It’s favored by chains like Accor and hotels that need granular control over operations and extensive data analysis.

For smaller hotels or those new to revenue management, Blastness’s ease of use and recent positive reviews make it the recommended option. Larger, more complex hotel groups might still consider Infor if they prioritize customization despite its aging user feedback.

Is Blastness RMS or Infor EzRMS Easier to Use?

Blastness RMS scores a remarkable 4.96/5 for ease of use, with an intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and a high level of staff adoption. Its recent reviews emphasize that even team members without a revenue background can quickly navigate and leverage its features, with support rated at 4.92/5.

In contrast, Infor EzRMS also rates well at 4.49/5 but faces criticism for requiring specific knowledge and experiencing occasional issues with updates, which can complicate daily operations. Its interface and automated report scheduling are less modern, leading to a steeper learning curve.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Features: Blastness or Infor?

Blastness boasts 23 exclusive features including AI optimization, customizable dashboards, market intelligence data, and booking pattern analysis—tools designed to enhance decision-making and automation. It also includes innovative functionalities like bulk adjustments, controlled automation, and event data, tailored for dynamic hotel environments.

Infor offers 15 unique features such as contact management, task management, group pricing, and multi-property management, which support operational workflows beyond revenue management. However, it lacks some advanced AI-driven pricing tools present in Blastness.

Overall, Blastness provides a broader array of features focused specifically on revenue optimization. Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Blastness or Infor?

Blastness’s support scores 4.92/5, with reviews highlighting efficient, fast, and knowledgeable assistance. Customers consistently praise its dedicated team and comprehensive onboarding, which fosters a smooth implementation process.

Infor’s support, rated at 4.04/5, is viewed as reliable but less responsive, with some users noting delays and difficulties in navigating the support channels. The larger scale of Infor’s operations may lead to less personalized service, especially in smaller markets.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has More Integrations: Blastness or Infor?

Blastness integrates with 15 verified partners, including key industry players like Mews, Duetto, and Oracle Hospitality. Its integrations cover core systems like PMS, channel managers, and revenue tools, ensuring smooth data flow.

Infor, with 113 verified partners, provides extensive integration options, including a wide array of third-party systems for content, CRM, and operations management. While more versatile in terms of connectivity, its complexity can be overwhelming for smaller hotels.

Edge: Infor.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Blastness or Infor?

Blastness has garnered 97 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness and support, and a 99% likelihood to recommend. It’s particularly popular among boutique and independent hotels that value simplicity and recent positive experiences.

Infor’s 39 reviews are older, with an overall high rating of 4.46/5, mainly from chain hotels and larger properties. The limited recent feedback indicates less current user satisfaction.

Edge: Blastness.

How Much Do Blastness and Infor Cost?

Both Blastness and Infor do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, typically offering customized quotes based on property size and needs. However, Blastness’s focus on smaller properties and its no-implementation fee suggest a more accessible, transparent pricing model.

Infor’s extensive modules and integration options usually come with higher costs and complex licensing, better suited for large operators with substantial budgets.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Blastness?

• Hotels that prioritize ease of use and quick deployment.
• Independent, boutique, and city-center properties seeking to boost direct bookings.
• Hotels that want AI-powered tools for dynamic pricing.
• Teams that prefer a system with intuitive dashboards and market insights.
• Not ideal if your hotel requires heavy customization or complex multi-property management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Infor?

• Large chains or multi-property portfolios needing extensive customization.
• Hotels with sophisticated operational workflows beyond revenue management.
• Teams looking for deep integration with third-party systems.
• Hotels that value detailed reporting and automated controls.
• Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited IT resources or a preference for simplicity.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Blastness RMS offers a modern, user-friendly platform with a strong focus on direct bookings and revenue optimization through AI and automation. Its high recent review scores and comprehensive feature set make it especially appealing for independent and boutique hotels.

Infor EzRMS provides a highly customizable, enterprise-level solution suited for large chains managing complex portfolios. Its extensive integrations and detailed reporting are strengths, but its older user feedback suggests it may not be as responsive or current as Blastness.

If your priority is ease of use, recent support, and a feature-rich platform, Blastness is the clear choice. For large, complex operations requiring extensive customization, Infor remains a strong, though less current, contender.