The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
MyComp se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de MyComp apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) and booking engine can transform your hotel’s operations and guest experience. Both MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS and HOTELTIME PMS aim to streamline processes, but their core functions and market presence differ significantly. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a specialized booking engine or a full-featured PMS with extensive integrations.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS targets reservation management and revenue optimization, whereas HOTELTIME offers a comprehensive platform covering reservations, guest management, and operational automation. Do you need an integrated system or a dedicated booking solution?
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS is designed solely for reservations and revenue control, promising automation and real-time updates. Its main strength lies in boosting booking efficiency and maximizing occupancy, especially through dynamic pricing tools. Conversely, HOTELTIME PMS functions as an all-in-one solution that manages reservations, housekeeping, POS, spa, and more, making it a flexible choice for diverse hotel types.
MyComp’s reviews focus on its integration ease and automation capabilities, but it has zero ratings and review counts, indicating limited user feedback. HOTELTIME, with over 430 recent reviews and a near-perfect overall rating of 4.83/5, is clearly more established and trusted by hoteliers. Given the recent and numerous reviews, HOTELTIME’s rating is more reliable and reflects current user experiences.
Do you want a dedicated booking engine that integrates with your existing systems, or a comprehensive PMS that can handle all hotel operations?
If your hotel needs a full-scale property management system that consolidates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, POS, and guest communications, HOTELTIME is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—over 51 unique capabilities—and broad integration ecosystem support larger or multi-property operations.
If your priority is to optimize bookings and revenue through a stand-alone, easy-to-integrate reservation platform, MyComp’s CRS might be suitable. However, without reviews and a proven track record, it’s difficult to assess its long-term reliability compared to HOTELTIME.
For hotels seeking an all-in-one operation hub, HOTELTIME’s comprehensive platform is preferable. Conversely, if your focus is solely on reservation automation, consider MyComp as a supplementary tool—though HOTELTIME’s reputation makes it a safer pick for overall hotel management.
HOTELTIME boasts a user-friendly, intuitive interface rated at 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its ease of onboarding and day-to-day operation. Its comprehensive features are designed for straightforward navigation, helping staff quickly adapt and maximize efficiency.
MyComp, with a rating of 0/5 and no reviews, offers no insight into its usability or onboarding experience. As a newer or less established solution, it’s impossible to confirm how easily your team will adopt or operate the platform.
Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME’s platform offers over 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, online check-in, and revenue management tools. It supports multi-currency, multi-lingual operations, and offers extensive automation and reporting capabilities not available in MyComp.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS appears to focus on reservation and revenue management, but it doesn’t disclose specific features or offer a comparable suite. With no verified features or user reviews, HOTELTIME’s extensive capabilities give it a decisive edge here.
Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME’s support team garners a 4.73/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful assistance, and a dedicated onboarding process. Users share quotes like “support staff were always on the other end of the phone and willing to help,” demonstrating high satisfaction.
MyComp, with zero reviews and support ratings, offers no reliable data on user support quality. Given the extensive positive feedback for HOTELTIME, it’s clearly the better choice for ongoing support.
Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME’s reviews, with 27 recent feedback entries, average 4.83/5, with many properties praising its operational efficiencies and support. Its ratings span various segments, including resorts and city center hotels, reflecting broad satisfaction.
MyComp has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of recent feedback significantly weakens its credibility compared to HOTELTIME’s well-documented positive reviews.
Edge: HOTELTIME.
MyComp provides no pricing information, indicating it may be a custom or less transparent offering. HOTELTIME charges a base price of $600 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, making its costs clear and predictable.
Given the lack of transparency around MyComp’s pricing, HOTELTIME’s straightforward model offers better value for your budget.
Edge: HOTELTIME.
Hotels that should use MyComp’s Booking Engine:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should use HOTELTIME PMS:
Not ideal if:
HOTELTIME PMS is a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform trusted by over 650 properties worldwide. It offers a wide range of features, strong support, and proven scalability, making it suitable for diverse hotel types and sizes.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS appears promising for reservation optimization but suffers from a lack of reviews and feature transparency. It’s best suited as a supplementary tool rather than a standalone solution or full management system.
Hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich PMS should confidently choose HOTELTIME. For those focused solely on reservations and revenue control, MyComp’s CRS could complement an existing setup, but with less certainty about long-term satisfaction.
In summary, if you need a proven, full-featured PMS that supports your entire operation, HOTELTIME is the clear choice. However, if your primary goal is to enhance your booking process through a dedicated engine, consider MyComp, keeping in mind the limited available data.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| MyComp |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Booking Engine CRS et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Booking Engine CRS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Booking Engine CRS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Booking Engine CRS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. MyComp a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits