The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
BridgerPay se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Chargeback Management.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $1,000/mo | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
Choosing the right payment processing platform for your hotel involves evaluating factors like ease of use, feature set, support quality, and integration capabilities. BridgerPay and roommaster Payments aim to streamline your payment workflows, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. BridgerPay offers extensive payment options and global reach, while roommaster Payments focuses on seamless integration within property management workflows. Your choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs.
Both BridgerPay and roommaster Payments address the critical need for efficient, secure, and flexible payment processing in hotels. BridgerPay excels with its broad payment provider network, supporting over 1,000 global and local processors, and offers advanced features like multi-currency settlements and Apple/Google Pay acceptance. Conversely, roommaster Payments emphasizes tight integration with its PMS, automated reconciliation, and dispute reduction, making it ideal for hotels seeking a unified system.
BridgerPay’s platform is built to handle complex, multi-channel payment flows, making it suitable for hotels with international guests or diverse payment preferences. Roommaster Payments, with its in-house dispute management and automation, targets hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and cost reduction. Both solutions aim to reduce manual tasks and enhance transaction security, but BridgerPay’s versatility makes it more adaptable to varied markets.
Do you need a payment system that supports multiple currencies and payment methods worldwide? If yes, BridgerPay is the recommended choice. If your hotel values tight PMS integration and dispute management, then roommaster Payments might be more suitable.
If your hotel needs extensive international payment options, multiple currencies, and a broad network of providers, go with BridgerPay. Its feature count (13 unique features) and global payment partner network make it a flexible choice for hotels operating across borders or with diverse guest demographics.
If your hotel prioritizes seamless integration within your existing PMS, automated reconciliation, and chargeback management, roommaster Payments is the better fit. Its core strength lies in reducing manual workload and preventing payment gaps, especially effective for hotels that want a unified operational platform.
For boutique hotels or properties focused on high operational efficiency, roommaster’s automation and dispute resolution features provide tangible benefits. Large resorts or hotels with complex international transactions should lean toward BridgerPay’s extensive payment options and multi-currency support.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and smooth operations. BridgerPay, despite its extensive features, has a complex interface with no recent reviews or a clear usability rating, which suggests a steep learning curve or limited user feedback. Its onboarding process isn’t well documented, which might complicate initial setup.
In contrast, roommaster Payments scores a 4.4/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews highlighting its straightforward, user-friendly interface and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate the clear workflows and minimal training needed to get staff operational. Review quotes emphasize that staff find roommaster Payments intuitive and easy to manage.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
BridgerPay offers 13 features, including advanced payment options like Klarna installment plans, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, WeChatPay, multi-currency settlements, and dynamic currency conversion. Its feature set caters to hotels needing versatile, multi-channel payment orchestration and global payment management.
roommaster Payments provides just 1 unique feature—chargeback management—focused on dispute resolution and automated reconciliation. While it covers core payment needs within hospitality workflows, it lacks the broad array of payment methods and currency features BridgerPay offers.
Edge: BridgerPay.
Customer support quality significantly impacts your experience. BridgerPay has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support reputation uncertain. The lack of feedback suggests limited or unproven support experiences.
roommaster Payments, with a 4.45/5 support rating and recent reviews praising helpful, knowledgeable staff, offers more reliable support. Users mention quick responses from dedicated representatives and effective issue resolution, making it the safer choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Integration capacity is vital for smooth operations. BridgerPay partners with 2 verified providers, including Mini Hotel PMS and Priority Software, indicating limited integration options. Its focus is on payment orchestration rather than deep PMS integration.
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified integrations, including popular PMSs like Sage, Volo, and Inntopia, as well as hotel marketing tools like GuestCentric and GuestRevu. Its extensive integration ecosystem supports comprehensive hotel management workflows.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Review data shows BridgerPay has no reviews or ratings, reflecting a lack of recent user feedback. This absence indicates either limited adoption or unreported experiences, making it difficult to assess user sentiment.
roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and an average NPS score of 8.4/10, is rated highly by hoteliers. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, support, and operational efficiency, making it the more trusted option across various hotel segments.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
BridgerPay’s pricing starts at a $1,000 monthly fee, with no freemium or trial options. Its costs are higher, reflecting its extensive features and global payment network.
roommaster Payments charges a $300 base fee, with no mention of additional costs or trials, making it more accessible for smaller hotels or those with tighter budgets. Its lower price point combined with automation features provides good value for many properties.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers simple, integrated payment workflows without extensive international features or if budget constraints are tight.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive multi-currency support or broad payment method options beyond basic credit card processing.
BridgerPay offers a global, feature-rich payment orchestration platform, ideal for hotels operating across borders and needing multiple currencies and payment options. Its extensive provider network and advanced features come with higher costs and a less transparent user experience, and it lacks recent user reviews for support.
roommaster Payments excels in integration, automation, and dispute management, backed by strong recent reviews and high user ratings. It’s best suited for hotels seeking a straightforward, reliable payment system deeply embedded within their property management workflow.
If your hotel emphasizes international transactions, multi-channel payment options, and flexible currency management, choose BridgerPay. For properties prioritizing seamless integration, operational automation, and proven support, roommaster Payments is the safer, more validated option.
In summary: If you need broad payment capabilities and international reach, go with BridgerPay. If your focus is on operational efficiency, support, and integration within your PMS, roommaster Payments delivers better value and user satisfaction.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, BridgerPay - Payment Orchestration Platform et roommaster Payments partagent 12 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte Apple Pay | ||
| Accepte Google Pay | ||
| Commande par correspondance Commande par téléphone (MOTO) Paiements | ||
| Gestion des rétrofacturations | ||
| Paiements récurrents | ||
| Plans de versement | ||
| Plans de versement de Klarna |
Affichage des principales differences. 2 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. BridgerPay - Payment Orchestration Platform et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. BridgerPay - Payment Orchestration Platform propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
BridgerPay - Payment Orchestration Platform : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. BridgerPay a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété