The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing between Cambridge PMS by Shiji and HotelTime PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Cambridge PMS is a less-reviewed, less recent product with no available ratings, but its integration capabilities and niche presence contrast sharply with HotelTime’s extensive features, proven market presence, and high user ratings. Your decision will largely depend on whether you prioritize proven customer satisfaction or a broader feature set.
Cambridge PMS remains virtually unreviewed, leaving your team with limited user feedback and uncertain support quality. Conversely, HotelTime boasts over 430 reviews in the past six months, a 4.83 out of 5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more reliable choice for most hotel operators.
Cambridge PMS aims to provide a comprehensive management platform, but its minimal review footprint and zero recent user feedback make it difficult to gauge real-world performance or support quality. HotelTime, by contrast, has a well-established presence across diverse hospitality segments, with recent, detailed reviews highlighting its ease of use, extensive features, and responsive support.
While Cambridge PMS claims to streamline operations, the lack of user-backed validation raises questions about its effectiveness. HotelTime’s recent reviews emphasize its ability to improve operational efficiency, especially through automation and integration, which are critical for modern hotels.
Are you willing to rely on a product with no recent customer data, or do you prefer a platform with demonstrated, current user satisfaction?
If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich PMS with extensive third-party integrations, go with HotelTime. Its 58 verified partners and over 430 recent reviews bolster confidence in its reliability and ongoing development.
If your hotel prioritizes a simple, less integrated management system, or if you’re exploring options without immediate support concerns, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing — but with no recent reviews, it’s difficult to verify its performance. For most hotels seeking proven results, HotelTime’s comprehensive platform and active customer base make it the clear choice.
For hotels that want a full suite of features—including guest CRM, booking engine, channel management, and automation—HotelTime is the safer bet. If your team favors a more basic, potentially less supported system, Cambridge may suffice, but with limited assurance.
HotelTime scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.66 out of 5 rating and numerous reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and efficient workflows. Users describe it as “simple, clear, and user-friendly,” facilitating staff training and daily operations.
Cambridge PMS, however, has no recent ratings or reviews, leaving its usability unverified and potentially less reliable. Its lack of user feedback prevents a confident assessment of onboarding or staff adoption.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automation, online check-in, and more—most of which are absent from Cambridge PMS. Its extensive feature set caters to mid- to large-sized hotels needing operational integration and automation.
Cambridge PMS appears to lack documented features, suggesting a more limited scope. For hotels seeking a versatile, feature-rich platform, HotelTime’s comprehensive offerings and proven flexibility provide a distinct advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support and onboarding ratings are both above 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful staff, and ongoing assistance. Review quotes such as “support staff were always on the other end of the phone and willing to help” underscore its emphasis on customer satisfaction.
Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. The absence of feedback leaves potential support concerns unverified, making HotelTime’s support reputation the safer choice.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime features 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, with many integrations tailored for revenue management, POS, and distribution. Its broad integration ecosystem is a key advantage for hotels seeking an interconnected tech stack.
Cambridge PMS, with only one verified partner and no mention of additional integrations, offers a stark contrast. If seamless connectivity is essential, HotelTime’s extensive third-party support makes it the obvious pick.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s recent reviews consistently rate it highly across segments, with an overall rating of 4.83/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of all sizes, from boutique to resorts, praise its ease of use, automation, and support quality.
Cambridge PMS, lacking recent reviews and ratings, offers no reliable data on user satisfaction. Based on current feedback, HotelTime’s user ratings strongly favor it for satisfaction and trust.
Edge: HotelTime.
Cambridge PMS provides no publicly available pricing information, leaving potential users uncertain about costs and value. HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no implementation or additional fees, offering transparent pricing for budgeting.
Without clear data on Cambridge PMS’s pricing, HotelTime’s straightforward fee structure and known costs make it easier for your team to plan financially.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven reliability, extensive features, or integration support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very limited budgets and minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer open-source solutions with less vendor support.
The core difference lies in market presence, user feedback, and feature breadth. HotelTime is a mature, well-supported platform with a broad feature set, proven satisfaction, and extensive integration options.
Choose HotelTime if your hotel needs reliability, extensive automation, and active support backed by recent reviews. Cambridge PMS might appeal to smaller operations with minimal needs, but without recent validation, it’s a riskier choice.
For most hotels looking for a trusted, feature-rich PMS that supports growth and operational complexity, HotelTime is the smarter choice. If simplicity and cost are your only concerns, and support is less critical, Cambridge could suffice—but with caution.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cambridge PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cambridge PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cambridge PMS propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cambridge PMS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits