The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,509 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Canary Technologies se distingue en matiere de contactless check-in — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme PMS Integration and Network security.
Sezam24 se distingue en customer support and ROI .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,509 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 1,508 | 1 |
Apres analyse de 1,509 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Canary Technologies apprecient surtout contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, tandis que ceux de Sezam24 mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Notifications automatiques
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration technique
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Enregistrement sans contact pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 98 avis | #16 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 1042 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 228 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #1 105 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #1 573 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #1 680 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 116 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #1 1308 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 65 avis | #16 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #1 27 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #2 11 avis | — |
Choosing between Canary Contactless Check-In and Sezam24 hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to modernize your check-in process, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and target hotel types. Canary offers a comprehensive guest management platform with a focus on automation, upselling, and security, while Sezam24 emphasizes quick, self-service check-in kiosks designed for efficiency. Which solution aligns better with your operational goals?
Both products address the desire for contactless check-in, but their approaches differ. Canary Technologies provides a full-fledged guest management platform that integrates with your existing PMS, offering features like digital authorization, guest messaging, and upselling, all within a modular setup. Sezam24, by contrast, focuses on self-service kiosks that enable guests to check in and receive room keys independently, bypassing front desk interactions entirely. Do you prefer a broad guest engagement system or a streamlined check-in kiosk?
Canary has a higher review count (1391 reviews) and recent feedback, making its data more robust and current. Sezam24 has just a single review but maintains a 5/5 rating, indicating strong satisfaction but limited data. If your hotel values ongoing support, proven adaptability, and a feature-rich solution, Canary’s larger user base and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice. Are you looking for a comprehensive platform or a straightforward check-in kiosk?
If your hotel needs a flexible, integrated guest management system capable of handling multiple touchpoints—from pre-arrival messaging to upselling—go with Canary Technologies. Its broad feature set, including PMS integration and security tools, suits hotels aiming to enhance guest experience while increasing revenue. If operational simplicity and quick deployment are your priorities, and you want a dedicated self-service kiosk solution, Sezam24 is the way to go, especially for small, budget-friendly properties.
Hotels that prioritize automation, guest communication, and revenue opportunities should choose Canary. Its versatility allows for tailored solutions across luxury, boutique, and branded hotels. Conversely, Sezam24 is ideal for hotels that want to implement quick, self-serve check-in kiosks with minimal fuss, especially in small or budget settings. Is your focus on a comprehensive guest engagement platform or a quick, standalone check-in solution?
Canary’s UI scores 4.82/5, and many reviews highlight its user-friendly interface that staff and guests find intuitive. Onboarding typically takes around 20 minutes, with numerous reviews praising the straightforward setup and quick staff adoption. Sezam24, rated 5/5 and supported by glowing reviews, emphasizes simplicity, with a focus on self-service kiosks that guests operate independently. Its dedicated kiosk interface is designed for ease of use, requiring minimal staff training.
While Canary offers a broader suite requiring some integration effort, its interface remains highly rated for simplicity. Sezam24’s focus on kiosk usability makes it the easier option for properties seeking fast implementation without extensive staff training. Edge: Sezam24.
Canary boasts 17 shared features with other guest management tools, plus 9 unique capabilities such as PMS integration, threat lifecycle management, automatic translations, and pre-arrival upselling. These allow for personalized guest interactions, security, compliance, and revenue boosts, making it a versatile platform.
Sezam24, with only one core product, offers a streamlined self-service check-in kiosk that allows guests to check in with their booking number and receive keys. It’s simple but lacks the advanced communication, upselling, or security features found in Canary. For feature depth and flexibility, Canary edges ahead, especially with its integrated guest engagement tools.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary’s support ratings stand at 4.69/5, with numerous reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hoteliers frequently mention the helpfulness of its customer service in troubleshooting integration issues and customizing the platform.
Sezam24, with a perfect 5/5 support rating based on limited reviews, appears highly satisfactory from current user feedback. However, the lack of recent or extensive reviews makes it harder to gauge ongoing support quality at scale. Given Canary’s larger, more recent review base, it demonstrates a proven track record of reliable support. Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary’s overall rating is 4.68/5 with 368 reviews in the last 6 months, indicating consistent, recent positive feedback. Hotels across various segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded properties, rate it highly, often citing its efficiency and revenue impact.
Sezam24, with a perfect 5/5 and only one review, cannot be reliably compared across a broad hotel base. The limited data suggests strong satisfaction but lacks the robustness of Canary’s recent, diverse feedback. Based on review volume and recency, Canary’s ratings are more indicative of ongoing performance.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $300, with no freemium, monthly, or implementation fees listed. Their straightforward pricing models make comparison easy; however, actual costs may vary based on additional modules or integrations.
Since both are similarly priced, your decision should depend on the value derived from features and support rather than cost alone.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or only needs a simple check-in kiosk.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced communication, upselling, or security features.
Canary Contactless Check-In provides a comprehensive, well-supported guest management system suited for hotels seeking to enhance the entire guest journey. Its extensive feature set and recent high ratings make it the more reliable choice for properties of all sizes aiming to boost revenue and guest satisfaction.
Sezam24 offers a straightforward, cost-effective self-service check-in kiosk ideal for small, budget-friendly hotels that want a quick fix with minimal setup. Its simplicity and high user satisfaction are appealing, but it lacks the breadth of features that Canary provides.
If your hotel values a flexible, integrated platform with proven support and recent reviews, go with Canary. If you need a quick, dedicated self-check-in solution for a small property, Sezam24 is a suitable alternative.
La tarification des Enregistrement sans contact est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Canary Contactless Check-In et Sezam24 partagent 17 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de conformité PCI | ||
| Gestion du cycle de vie des menaces | ||
| Intégration PMS | ||
| Préparation à la conformité | ||
| Sécurité Internet | ||
| Tests de pénétration |
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
Bien que beaucoup aient trouvé la plateforme Canary conviviale, plusieurs utilisateurs ont signalé des problèmes d'intégration avec leurs systèmes de... Bien que beaucoup aient trouvé la plateforme Canary conviviale, plusieurs utilisateurs ont signalé des problèmes d'intégration avec leurs systèmes de gestion immobilière (PMS) existants et ont suggéré que des améliorations dans ce domaine permettraient de fluidifier davantage les opérations.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Canary Contactless Check-In et Sezam24 partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Contactless Check-in de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Canary Contactless Check-In propose 54 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sezam24 en propose 9. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Sezam24 est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.8/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Canary Contactless Check-In : Non. Sezam24 : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Contactless Check-in proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Canary Technologies a un HT Score de 100 et Sezam24 a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits