The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Chetu Inc se distingue .
Guestnet se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
Notes comparees basees sur 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 165 |
Apres analyse de 165 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Chetu Inc apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Guestnet mettent en avant user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, expérience client positive. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Expérience client positive
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration avec des systèmes externes
▾
|
|
|
−
Notifications push et alertes
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 56 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 85 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #17 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #23 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 52 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 66 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #7 18 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #13 3 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 158 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #16 0 avis |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can transform your property’s guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Both Chetu and Guestnet aim to serve this purpose, but they tackle the challenge very differently—Chetu focuses on custom software solutions for travel and hospitality, while Guestnet offers a comprehensive, ready-to-deploy guest engagement platform. With Guestnet boasting recent reviews and a higher user rating, your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and readiness for customization versus out-of-the-box functionality.
Are you looking for a flexible, highly customizable platform or a straightforward, feature-rich guest app that’s proven to boost engagement quickly?
Chetu Inc primarily provides bespoke software development tailored to client specifications, focusing on custom integrations like GDS, online booking, and portal development. Its offerings are designed for hotel brands or tech-savvy teams wanting to build or enhance existing systems with specialized solutions, but it lacks a ready-made, user-friendly guest app.
Guestnet, in contrast, offers a ready-to-use digital guest experience platform with 12 built-in features, including guest messaging, room service ordering, and multilingual support. Its platform is designed for hotels that want to enhance guest communication and engagement without extensive development or customization.
Chetu’s approach is ideal if your hotel needs tailored integrations or specific operational tools, especially if you already have a technical team. Guestnet is better suited if you desire a comprehensive, easy-to-implement guest app that directly improves guest satisfaction and operational efficiency with minimal setup.
If your hotel is a large, tech-forward property or a chain with complex, bespoke needs, Chetu’s custom development services may be the better fit. Its experience with GDS integrations, travel portals, and booking engines caters to properties requiring specialized, integrated solutions.
If your hotel aims to quickly elevate guest communication, automate information, and boost engagement with a proven platform, Guestnet is the clear choice. Its high recent review count (152 reviews, 51 in the last 6 months) and a 9.51/10 NPS score reflect strong user satisfaction and adoption.
Hotels that need tailored, highly specific software solutions should lean towards Chetu, especially if they have in-house development resources. Conversely, properties seeking a plug-and-play guest app with multiple features and rapid deployment should select Guestnet.
Guestnet scores 4.74/5 for ease of use, with most reviews highlighting its intuitive design, user-friendly interface, and quick onboarding process—average onboarding rating is 4.66/5. Guests and staff find Guestnet easy to navigate, reducing training time and increasing adoption rates.
Chetu, however, has no available usability ratings and lacks a standardized user interface, as it primarily offers custom solutions. This means your team will likely need dedicated technical support during deployment and ongoing maintenance.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 12 features, including request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, local recommendations, multilingual translations, payments, and guest messaging. These features are integrated into a user-friendly web app designed for quick guest access and hotel staff management.
Chetu, on the other hand, provides no pre-built features but develops custom solutions like online booking, GDS APIs, and travel portals tailored to your specifications. Its features depend entirely on your hotel’s custom development needs.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s customer support scores 4.82/5, with reviews praising its helpful, responsive team and smooth onboarding. Users frequently mention that support is a key factor in their positive experience, with ongoing assistance provided post-implementation.
Chetu has no available customer support ratings or reviews, as it offers custom development rather than ongoing support for a standardized platform. Support quality thus may vary significantly based on your project scope and vendor engagement.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet integrates with 20 verified partners, including property management systems like Mews, hotel software like ASA Hotelsoftware, and digital services such as FLEXIPASS and Reguest. Its open architecture allows seamless connection with existing hotel systems and third-party tools.
Chetu’s offerings are primarily custom-developed solutions with no predefined integrations listed, relying on your hotel’s specific requirements and development resources. It’s less about out-of-the-box integrations and more about building integrations as needed.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s recent reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 9.51/10 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, including luxury and boutique properties. Its user base includes hotels in North America, Europe, and other regions, with numerous small-property case studies emphasizing operational improvements.
Chetu, lacking recent reviews and user feedback, cannot be rated, but its reputation for custom software development is well-established among larger hotel brands and enterprise clients.
Edge: Guestnet.
Chetu does not publish pricing publicly, as its offerings are custom quotes based on project scope and client requirements. Expect higher costs associated with development, integration, and ongoing support tailored to your hotel.
Guestnet charges a $500 monthly fee with no implementation or setup costs disclosed. This predictable pricing model makes budgeting easier, especially for properties seeking immediate results.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers quick deployment and minimal upfront technical work.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly tailored, integrated software solutions that require extensive development.
The core difference is that Chetu offers tailored software solutions built to your specifications, while Guestnet provides an all-in-one guest app with proven features and rapid deployment. If customization and bespoke integrations are critical, Chetu is the way to go.
For most hoteliers wanting a plug-and-play platform that increases guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and revenue, Guestnet is the stronger choice, evidenced by its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features.
Choose Chetu if your hotel has complex, unique operational needs and the resources to develop and maintain custom software solutions. Opt for Guestnet if you want a reliable, feature-rich guest app that can be implemented quickly, with high user satisfaction and ongoing support.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Chetu et Guestnet partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Annuaire des hôtels | ||
| Application Web | ||
| Commande de service en chambre | ||
| Gestion des demandes | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Recommandations locales |
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit... De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit par des commentaires positifs et potentiellement une augmentation des visites de retour.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains exp... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains expriment le souhait d'une intégration plus poussée afin d'améliorer l'automatisation et de réduire les tâches manuelles.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Chetu et Guestnet partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Chetu propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Guestnet en propose 20. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Guestnet est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Chetu : Non. Guestnet : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Chetu Inc a un HT Score de 0 et Guestnet a 96. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits