The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,436 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cloudbeds se distingue en matiere de intuitiveness and ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.5/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
MISTER BOOKING se distingue en customer support and ROI , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Native Email Marketing and Native Email Marketing.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,436 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 1,414 | 22 |
Apres analyse de 1,436 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cloudbeds apprecient surtout intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, tandis que ceux de MISTER BOOKING mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversion de devises et opérations financières
▾
|
|
|
−
Fonctionnalités mobiles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 675 avis | #25 10 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 235 avis | #24 5 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 51 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #4 5 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 avis | #28 6 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 245 avis | #25 4 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 145 avis | #27 3 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 96 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #2 532 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 166 avis | #11 19 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #3 201 avis | #23 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #3 13 avis | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Misterbooking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline operations and increase bookings, but Cloudbeds offers a broader set of features with a well-established reputation backed by more recent reviews. Misterbooking, while slightly less comprehensive, provides a cost-effective, scalable solution with high customer satisfaction, particularly for independent properties.
Considering the volume of recent feedback, which platform aligns better with your strategic goals and operational scale?
Both Cloudbeds and Misterbooking aim to simplify hotel management by centralizing reservations, operations, and distribution channels. Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, is the most reviewed and awarded platform, boasting a 100/100 score on HotelTechReport and over 1,200 reviews, most recent ones within the last six months. Misterbooking, established in 2003, has a smaller footprint with only 21 reviews, but these are all recent and highly positive, giving it a 4.83/5 overall rating.
Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set includes integrations with revenue management, analytics, and a highly scalable PMS, making it suitable for properties aiming to grow or optimize complex operations. Misterbooking, with fewer features but a responsive interface, appeals to independent hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly system with high customer satisfaction.
Are you prioritizing a proven, feature-rich platform with global support, or a lean, efficient system that’s easy to implement and manage?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated platform that handles reservations, channel management, revenue optimization, and guest engagement at scale, Cloudbeds is the better choice. Its broad partner network and multi-lingual, multi-currency support make it ideal for properties looking to expand internationally. If your team seeks a flexible, scalable solution with a focus on direct bookings and operational simplicity, Misterbooking’s cost-effective, all-in-one design can meet your needs.
For larger properties or those with complex distribution and automation needs, Cloudbeds’ extensive features and recent reviews make it the clear leader. Smaller hotels or chains emphasizing ease of use and quick onboarding might find Misterbooking more aligned with their operational style.
If you want a comprehensive, globally-supported system, go with Cloudbeds. If you prefer a straightforward, responsive platform with high satisfaction scores, choose Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds’ interface is highly rated at 4.58/5 and is praised for its intuitive navigation, quick onboarding, and user-friendly design, which makes staff adoption relatively straightforward. Many recent reviews highlight its ease of use, especially for properties that need to manage multiple channels and complex operations.
Misterbooking slightly edges out with a 4.6/5 score and is recognized for a responsive, straightforward interface that hotel teams find efficient, especially for independent properties. Reviewers note it’s easy to learn and manage, with clear reservation and booking screens.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds offers a suite of 57 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, housekeepings, automated reporting, and multi-lingual support. Its integrations with over 190 partners enable extensive connectivity with OTAs, POS systems, and revenue tools, supporting properties of all sizes.
Misterbooking, with only 5 unique features, focuses on core hotel operations such as reservations, channel management, pre-check-in, and payment automation. While less feature-rich, it excels at providing a streamlined, cost-effective solution.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support score is 4.38/5, with reviews mentioning quick, attentive responses but occasional slowdowns during busy periods. Some users describe their support as friendly and helpful, though a few note long wait times for complex issues.
Misterbooking’s customer support rating stands out at 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing its operational effectiveness and responsiveness. Users report that the team is helpful, with quick resolutions to issues, especially given the smaller team size.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, revenue management, and payment providers, with 15 shared partners with Misterbooking. Its broad integration network allows for extensive automation, data synchronization, and operational flexibility.
Misterbooking has 26 verified partners, including key OTAs and payment systems, with some exclusive integrations like Vingcard, RoomCloud, and Onity. While fewer in number, these integrations are sufficient for many independent hotels.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 1,219 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, extensive features, and reliable support. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and hostel operations, praise its scalability and automation.
Misterbooking scores slightly higher at 4.83/5 from 21 reviews, with all recent feedback highlighting its simplicity, responsiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Independent hotels appreciate its flexibility and ease of managing high volumes with fewer features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds is priced at a flat $500 monthly fee with no trial or freemium option, offering a transparent cost for its extensive capabilities. Misterbooking’s pricing is not publicly listed but is positioned as a competitive, scalable solution for independent hotels, often viewed as more affordable.
If your budget is tight or you prefer a pay-as-you-grow model, Misterbooking’s lower-cost structure may appeal. For larger or growing properties, Cloudbeds’ value justifies its higher investment.
Not ideal if you want a simple, budget-friendly solution for very small properties or single-location hotels with minimal distribution needs.
Not ideal if you require a highly customizable or feature-rich platform that handles complex revenue management or extensive multi-channel distribution.
Cloudbeds is a versatile, feature-rich platform suited for properties that need a scalable, globally supported system capable of handling complex operations. Its ability to connect operations, revenue, and distribution makes it ideal for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs deep integration, automation, and a proven track record backed by thousands of recent reviews, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its broad partner network and extensive feature set justify its higher price point for properties seeking a comprehensive solution.
Misterbooking, with its high customer satisfaction and competitive pricing, appeals to independent hotels and small chains that prefer simplicity and agility. It’s best for properties that want a straightforward, responsive PMS with core automation, without the need for extensive features or integrations.
For most hotels looking for proven reliability, broad capabilities, and ongoing innovation, Cloudbeds stands out as the stronger option.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cloudbeds HMS et Misterbooking (HMS) partagent 33 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivité PMS | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion de l'inventaire | ||
| Intégrations bidirectionnelles en temps réel | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Marketing par e-mail natif | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Planification des quarts de travail | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Suivi des revenus auxiliaires | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique |
Affichage des principales differences. 50 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont si... Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont signalé des écarts qui impactent les processus de rapprochement. Des configurations améliorées pour la conversion des devises pourraient simplifier la gestion financière.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cloudbeds HMS et Misterbooking (HMS) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cloudbeds HMS propose 189 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Misterbooking (HMS) en propose 26. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Cloudbeds HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 4.6/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cloudbeds HMS : Non. Misterbooking (HMS) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cloudbeds a un HT Score de 100 et MISTER BOOKING a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits